The Medical Mafia Is Part of the Jewish Mafia Running the United States Into the Ground


Exclusive: Woman Injured by Pfizer Shot Forced to Get Vaccine Despite Pre-Existing Heart Issue

Heather Elkins, 45, couldn’t get a medical exemption from her employer’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate despite a pre-existing heart condition — now she can’t work at all.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the DayIt’s free.

When her employer in 2021 mandated all employees get the COVID-19 vaccine, Heather Elkins, who had a pre-existing heart condition, requested a medical exemption.

But the Oregon Department of Human Services turned down her application — even though Elkins had transitioned, in 2020, to a permanent work-from-home employee.

Elkins told The Defender:

“All State of Oregon employees were mandated by Gov. Kate Brown to be fully vaccinated from COVID-19 or to meet a qualifying exemption regardless of if the employee was working from home or not and if we did not comply, we would lose our job!”

Elkins, 45, was reluctant to get the vaccine for several reasons, she said:

“I am by no means against vaccines. With that being said, I was not comfortable with the COVID-19 vaccine for a number of reasons. First, I didn’t feel like there was enough known about it and the long-term effects it might have.

“Second, I saw reports stating people were developing heart issues, and given that I myself have a heart issue, I wasn’t feeling comfortable with getting the vaccine.”

She added: “It’s my body and the decision should be my choice! I know how my body reacts to trauma, illness, etc. I should be able to choose what goes in it.”

Elkins tried every available avenue in her attempt to get an exemption. She told The Defender:

“I spoke to management, HR and my union, [Service Employees International Union] SEIU, multiple times about how uneasy I felt getting the COVID-19 vaccine. I also spoke with my doctors … multiple times about my concerns and asked for a medical exemption. They kept advising me to get the vaccine and stated the ‘reward outweighs the risk.’

“I even contacted my cardiologist … and was transferred to my cardiologist’s nurse, who stated: ‘we are not advising on whether or not you should receive the COVID-19 vaccine.’”

Elkins said given the vaccines were causing heart issues, she thought her cardiologist, of all people, would be willing to weigh in.

“That wasn’t the case here, she said. “They turned a blind eye.”

After she ran out of options — including not meeting the requirements for a religious exemption, either — Elkins was forced to choose between the vaccine and her job.

Symptoms occurred ‘within an hour’ of first Pfizer shot

Elkins got the Pfizer vaccine on Sept. 12, 2021, and “within about an hour,” she said, began experiencing adverse reactions.

The reactions she experienced after the first shot didn’t qualify her for a medical exemption from the second shot, she said:

“I even asked for a medical exemption from the second dose of the vaccine after several visits to the doctor for severe symptoms after receiving the first dose of Pfizer.

“I was told that they were not giving medical exemptions because the ‘reward outweighs the risk.’”

So despite continued efforts to secure a medical exemption, Elkins received her second Pfizer shot on Oct. 3, 2021, and experienced “the same severe reaction as with the first dose.”

The symptoms included “severe headache[s], severe muscle aches, [a] racing heartbeat … nausea, severe fatigue and dizziness/balance issues, chest pressure/tightness, shortness of breath [and] a severe cough,” she said.

A year later, Elkins continues to experience symptoms that affect her ability to work.

Elkins told The Defender:

“To date, I’m experiencing all the same issues in addition to other symptoms like brain fog, horrible joint pain, pins and needles sensations, painful nerve zaps, shakiness and tremors in my hands and feet, and vision issues.

“At times, some of the symptoms are worse than others, but the symptoms as a whole have been so debilitating daily, I eventually couldn’t continue working and have had to go on workman’s compensation for now.”

Prior to getting the vaccines, Elkins said she was “living a normal life, walking and jogging several times a week for exercise and living a normal life.”

But now, she said, “I’ve now been mostly confined to my bed for the last 11 months, unable to do minimal activities because of my debilitating symptoms,” she said. “Tasks that seemed easy before, like working on crafts, doing the dishes, cooking or a trip to the store is physically exhausting and my symptoms are overwhelming.”

After visiting a succession of doctors — including her primary physician, a COVID-19 recovery specialist, a physical therapist, a speech therapist, a cardiologist, a pulmonologist, a rheumatologist, a neurologist and an ophthalmologist — Elkins was diagnosed with dysautonomia, a condition characterized by a malfunctioning autonomic nervous system, she said.

“Most of the doctors I’ve seen think I’m having some kind of immune response to the vaccine but don’t know why or how to stop it because so little is known.”

She’s tried a variety of medications and treatments, including physical therapy, speech therapy, a clean diet and even celery juice, but “none of them seem to be helping,” Elkins said.

“The pulmonologist has me on a steroid inhaler which helps so long as I’m not having long conversations or exerting myself.

She added:

“I have no personal life because every time I try to leave home and do anything social, my symptoms are exacerbated. I spend most of my days in bed. And on good days, I make it out to the living room to rest in a recliner.”

Although she was unable to secure a medical exemption for her first or second doses, Elkins said that she has “now been told I can have an exemption from the booster” — but only after “multiple visits with multiple doctors,” who told her that the reaction she experienced “is severe.”

Elkins said her primary doctor “has since apologized to me verbally for not listening to my concerns when I asked for the medical exemption.”

Though too late to help Elkins, her employer subsequently removed the mandate, “at the same time they were doing a big hiring push for new employees,” she said.

Government ‘sweeping it under the rug, like it isn’t real’

Though friends and family have provided some support, they don’t fully understand what she’s experiencing, Elkins said.

“Either they are supportive quiet, or just try to explain away the reason for my symptoms such as… ‘maybe the vaccine exacerbated a condition you already had that you didn’t know about or that was dormant.’”

Elkins, who said she knows “with 100% certainty that I was healthy prior to the COVID-19 vaccine,” has found a greater level of support through online support groups for vaccine-injured groups — including the Vaccine Injury/Side Effects Support GroupReal Not Rare and ReAct19.

“They’ve all been a wealth of information,” she said.

Even though “it’s sad to hear the stories being shared,” Elkins said, “it’s comforting to know that others understand and know what it’s like to go through what you are [going through]. These side effects are debilitating and it is very easy to become depressed, even if you’re someone like me who has never really experienced that in the past.”

She said the people in these support groups are “vital” to healing. “Not only are we able to relate to one another, but these ‘perfect strangers’ understand in ways your closest family members and friends can’t.”

Elkins hopes these groups — and the vaccine-injured individuals who are speaking out — will translate to pressure on governmental authorities.

“Our government needs to take accountability for the lack of transparency with the COVID-19 vaccines,” said Elkins. “Their lack of transparency and shadiness surrounding adverse reactions is hurting so many, but they just continue sweeping it under the rug like it isn’t real or happening.”


‘Stunning’: The Real Reason Health Officials Won’t Let Independent Scientists Examine mRNA Vaccine Vials

A data leak suggests the real reason health officials don’t want individual vaccine vials examined by independent scientists is that the vials are all different — and the mRNA in the shots is not intact.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the DayIt’s free.

Story at a glance:

  • The reason health officials don’t want individual vaccine vials examined by independent scientists is that the vials are all different — and the mRNA in the shots is not intact.
  • For an effective mRNA product, the mRNA integrity needs to be 100%, meaning all the RNA must be intact. Considering how ineffective the jabs are, it seems fair to question whether lack of mRNA integrity might be to blame.
  • Fragmented RNA could potentially also be hazardous to health by generating incomplete spike proteins. While we do not know if incomplete spike proteins are dangerous, it’s possible they might contribute to cellular stress.
  • The “bad batch” phenomenon may also be indicative of quality problems. Independent investigations have revealed that some lots of the shots are associated with very severe side effects and death, whereas other lots have very few or no adverse events associated with their use.
  • However, the fact that “hot” lots are being released in a coordinated fashion suggests vaccine makers may in fact be doing intentional lethal-dose testing on the public, and that these “bad batches” are not merely the result of intermittently poor manufacturing.

A 14-minute video (below) that has been overlooked for nearly two years has now resurfaced, exposing stunning information about the COVID-19 jabs and why health officials don’t want individual vaccine vials examined by independent scientists.

The reason, it turns out, is because the vials are all different — and the mRNA in the shots “is not intact.” Both of these pose potentially serious problems.

In an Aug. 31 Substack article, Steve Kirsch explains:

“Even if you are getting 100% intact mRNA which would be really rare, you’re still not getting anything that resembles the virus. So the efficacy as far as PROTECTING you will be next to nothing.

“However, what it will do very effectively, if you got reasonably intact mRNA, is to cause you significant harm. You are playing a game of chance with your immune system and what is in the bottle.”

The video notes that members of the European Parliament were only allowed to read the contracts with the drug makers after they’d been heavily redacted. Why the heavy-handed secrecy, even toward legislators?

Leaked documents reveal serious quality issues

The finding that the mRNA in the shots was of questionable quality was revealed in a British Medical Journal feature investigation article published in March 2021.

As explained by the author, journalist Serena Tinari, cyber attackers retrieved more than 40 megabytes of Pfizer COVID-19 jab data from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in December 2020.

The hacked data was subsequently sent to journalists and academics worldwide. It was also published on the dark web. Some of the documents show European regulators had significant concerns over the lack of intact mRNA in the commercial batches sampled.

Compared to the clinical batches, i.e., the shots used in the clinical trial, 55% to 78% of the commercial shots had “a significant difference in % RNA integrity/truncated species.”

In one email, dated Nov. 23, 2020, a high-ranking EMA official noted that the commercial batches failed to meet expected specifications, and that the implications of this RNA integrity loss were unclear. In response to the findings, the EMA sent a list of questions and concerns to Pfizer.

While we do not know if and how the EMA’s concerns were actually addressed and corrected, the EMA authorized Pfizer’s COVID-19 jab Dec. 21, 2020.

According to its public assessment report, “the quality of this medicinal product, submitted in the emergency context of the current (COVID-19) pandemic, is considered to be sufficiently consistent and acceptable.”

Similarly, Health Canada told the Britsh Medical Journal that “changes were made in their processes to ensure that the integrity was improved and brought in line with what was seen for clinical trial batches.” The EMA further tried to deflect concern by claiming some of the leaked documents had been doctored.

As reported by the British Medical Journal:

“EMA says the leaked information was partially doctored, explaining in a statement that ‘whilst individual emails are authentic, data from different users were selected and aggregated, screenshots from multiple folders and mailboxes have been created, and additional titles were added by the perpetrators.’”



Intact mRNA is essential to its effectiveness

Curiously, when the Britsh Medical Journal asked Pfizer, Moderna, CureVac and several regulators to specify the percentage of mRNA integrity considered acceptable, none replied with specifics.

According to the British Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, the FDA and Health Canada, the specification limit on RNA integrity is “commercially confidential.” What we do know — and the EMA has acknowledged — is that intact mRNA is essential for efficacy.

As noted by the Britsh Medical Journal:

“The documents offer the broader medical community a chance to reflect on the complexities of quality assurance for novel mRNA vaccines, which include everything from the quantification and integrity of mRNA and carrier lipids to measuring the distribution of particle sizes and encapsulation efficiency.

“Of particular concern is RNA instability, one of the most important variables relevant to all mRNA vaccines that has thus far received scant attention in the clinical community. …

“RNA instability is one of the biggest hurdles for researchers developing nucleic acid based vaccines. It is the primary reason for the technology’s stringent cold chain requirements and has been addressed by encapsulating the mRNA in lipid nanoparticles.

“‘The complete, intact mRNA molecule is essential to its potency as a vaccine,’ professor of biopharmaceutics Daan J.A. Crommelin and colleagues wrote in a review article in The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences late last year.

“‘Even a minor degradation reaction, anywhere along a mRNA strand, can severely slow or stop proper translation performance of that strand and thus result in the incomplete expression of the target antigen.’”

For an effective product, mRNA integrity needs to be 100%. Considering how ineffective the jabs are, it seems fair to question whether lack of mRNA integrity might be to blame. We also do not know whether nonintact mRNA might be harmful.

As noted by Kirsch, “Unstable mRNA means the spike protein … could collapse, making the whole process useless to support immunity, but still dangerous in terms of damage to cells. So, you get all the risk and no benefit.”

While our public health agencies claim fragmented RNA poses no health risk, just how do they know that? The leaked documents revealed they specifically did not have an answer to that question, and no research into the matter has been published, that I’m aware of.

Fragmented RNA may produce incomplete spike proteins

In May 2021, Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT for over five decades, published an excellent paper in which she highlighted several potential dangers of the COVID-19 jabs, including the unknown hazard of injecting fragmented RNA.

That same month, I interviewed her about her concerns. You can find that interview in “COVID Vaccines May Bring Avalanche of Neurological Disease.”

In her paper, Seneff noted:

“The EMA Public Assessment Report … describes in detail a review of the [Pfizer] manufacturing process … One concerning revelation is the presence of ‘fragmented species’ of RNA in the injection solution.

“These are RNA fragments resulting from early termination of the process of transcription from the DNA template.

“These fragments, if translated by the cell following injection, would generate incomplete spike proteins, again resulting in altered and unpredictable three-dimensional structure and a physiological impact that is at best neutral and at worst detrimental to cellular functioning.

“There were considerably more of these fragmented forms of RNA found in the commercially manufactured products than in the products used in clinical trials. The latter were produced via a much more tightly controlled manufacturing process. …

“While we are not asserting that non-spike proteins generated from fragmented RNA would be misfolded or otherwise pathological, we believe they would at least contribute to the cellular stress that promotes prion-associated conformational changes in the spike protein that is present.”

Kirsch points out that the EMA also expressed concern over visible particles in the vials, which the Britsh Medical Journal did not follow up on. “Is it still a problem?” Kirsch asks. That’s a good question, and the answer is probably yes.

But even worse is that we have absolutely no idea what these incomplete spike proteins are doing, none, zero, nada. It has never been directly examined. For that matter efforts to evaluate, and complications of the jab, have been consciously suppressed as have following simple metrics such as increases in all-cause mortality.

Deaths dismissed and side effects misclassified

The leaked EMA documents also showed that Pfizer dismissed all deaths in its trial as “unrelated to the vaccine,” even though no proper investigation was ever conducted.

We now have additional evidence of this — just like the court-ordered FOIA documents showed what Pfizer did in their U.S. trials. At least they are consistent in implementing their fraud.

As reported by Children’s Health Defense (CHD) back in June, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents, released by court order, reveal Pfizer classified nearly all severe reactions in its trials as unrelated to the shot, even in cases where the health problems in question are extremely difficult to dismiss as anything other than a direct effect of the shot:

“The latest release by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine documents reveals numerous instances of participants who sustained severe adverse events during Phase 3 trials. Some of these participants withdrew from the trials, some were dropped and some died. …

“The CRFs [case report forms] included in this month’s documents contain often vague explanations of the specific symptoms experienced by the trial participants. They also reveal a trend of classifying almost all adverse events — and in particular severe adverse events (SAEs) — as being ‘not related’ to the vaccine. …

“The many serious adverse events — and several deaths — recorded during the Phase 3 trials are also apparent in a separate, massive document exceeding 2,500 pages, cataloging such adverse events.

“This document lists a wide range of adverse events suffered by trial participants classified as toxicity level 4 — the highest and most serious such level. However, not one of the level 4 (most severe) adverse events listed in this particular document is classified as being related to the vaccination.”

As just one example, a teenage girl got the shot Sept. 11, 2020, and in mid-November 2020 was diagnosed with right lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, which we now know is a potential side effect of the jab.

According to the CRF, her condition was due to a bone fracture that occurred before the date of her injection — a determination that seems questionable at best.

What’s the cause behind the ‘bad batch’ phenomenon?

The “bad batch” phenomenon may also be indicative of quality problems. Independent investigations have revealed that some lots of the shots are associated with very severe side effects and death, whereas other lots have very few or no adverse events associated with their use.

According to, a site that matches up vaccine lot codes with reports in the VAERS system, approximately 5% of the lots are responsible for 90% of all adverse reactions. Some of these batches have 50 times the number of deaths and disabilities associated with them, compared to other lots.

Another website that basically does the same thing is WelcomeTheEagle’s VAERS Dashboard. A video explaining how to use the dashboard can be found on Bitchute.

However, an even deeper dive into this data suggests random quality issues are not the problem. In the video above, Reiner Fuellmich, cofounder of the German Corona Investigative Committee, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former member of the German parliament, discuss this “smoking gun” evidence.

According to Fuellmich and Wodarg, the lot-dependent data suggests vaccine makers may be conducting secret experiments within the larger public trial. In other words, they appear to be doing lethal-dose testing on the public.

The tipoff that these “hot” batches are not caused by intermittent poor manufacturing is the fact that they’re being released in a coordinated fashion.

Wodarg argues that the evidence for this is very clear from the data. Basically, the vaccine manufacturers are coordinating their lethal-dose experiments so that they’re not all releasing their most toxic lots at the same time, or in the same areas. This avoids detection through clustering.

New boosters will not undergo additional testing

Considering the multitude of open questions surrounding the safety of the original COVID-19 shots, the fact that new, reformulated boosters will not require any additional testing whatsoever is beyond disturbing.

In the “Friday Roundtable” video above, Dr. Meryl Nass, Toby Rogers, Ph.D., Aimee Villella McBride, Polly Tommey and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., discuss the FDA’s decision to allow vaccine makers to reformulate their COVID-19 shots without additional testing, in perpetuity.

As noted by Rogers, Pfizer’s bivalent booster against Omicron variants BA.4 and BA.5 was tested on a total of eight mice, and only to check antibody levels. Moderna also used mice to ascertain antibody responses, but has not disclosed the number of mice used.

That’s the extent to which these shots were tested. The original COVID-19 jabs are the most dangerous drugs ever released to the public, and these newer boosters may turn out to be even worse.

As explained by Rogers, the shots “imprint” your immune system to respond only to the antigen in the shot, while simultaneously impairing your immune system so that it’s less capable of protecting you against other pathogens.

Another term for this process is “original antigenic sin.” It essentially explains why those who are jabbed are getting infected and sicker than those who avoided the jabs.

Rogers predicts we’ll be faced with a winter of severe illness and death among those who have gotten the jabs. All the rest of us can do is stand back, avoid the shots at all costs and “let the mainstream system self-destruct.” Hopefully, he’s correct in his other prediction, which is that the vast majority of Americans will reject these boosters.

Originally published by Mercola.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.


Exclusive: Woman Injured by J&J Vaccine Has ‘Never Seen Such Meanness’

After she was injured by the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine, Sheila Bath said doctors screamed at her and told her she was “nuts” for thinking the vaccine caused her injuries.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the DayIt’s free.

Sheila Bath, a 60-something chef and life coach from Connecticut, first suspected she’d been injured by the single-dose Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID-19 vaccine on April 11, 2021 — exactly 14 days after she got the vaccine.

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Bath said her initial symptoms included a burning sensation running from her legs to her spine and numbness in her feet. The symptoms lasted for two months.

“My legs were burning from my ankle all the way up to my lower spine on both sides. Burning, burning, burning,” Bath said. “My feet were numb. It was burning out the nerves in my legs and in my spine.”

She said she also sustained “terrible bruising” on her extremities, dry mouth, worsening vision, inability to walk, cysts on her kidneys, gallstones in her bladder, calf cramps, muscle spasms, depression, brain fog and 20 lbs. of water-weight gain.

These are “classical Guillain-Barré Syndrome symptoms,” Bath said.

Bath suspected the vaccine triggered the symptoms, but doctors were initially reluctant to draw the same conclusion.

Bath told The Defender:

“I didn’t know what Guillain-Barré was, but it’s a very well-known thing that you have to go directly to the hospital. And [my neurologist] could have sent me directly to the hospital. The neurologist neglected to follow the protocol of getting me into hospital when they could have cured it.”

“Three times I went back to him and he sent me home,” she said, telling her, “There’s nothing wrong with you. You’ve got neuropathy because you’re older.”

When Bath told her doctor the only explanation she could think of was that she’d been vaccinated two-and-a-half weeks ago, “He practically kicked me out of the office,” she said. “And then I called back a third time. I said, my legs are still burning up … can you help me? And they refused to see me.”

Then things got worse.

More than a year after getting the J&J vaccine, Bath began to experience new symptoms, including partial digestive paralysis, which she said “means the COVID-19 spike protein [was] still alive, doing damage,” even though it is “supposed to be a dead virus, we were told.”

Doctors attributed the new symptoms to Crohn’s disease, a type of inflammatory bowel disorder, because Bath had a history of autoimmune disease.

But Bath disagreed with that diagnosis:

“I felt like saying, honey, I had Crohn’s when nobody knew Crohn’s, and I had to fight my way through that for 13 years. I said, that is not Crohn’s … That is the paralysis from the shot.”

Bath described being “chided and yelled at” by doctors for even suggesting her health troubles were related to the vaccine. According to her, it was not until she visited a naturopathic doctor that she finally received care, attention and a concrete diagnosis.

She said:

“I walked in, he took one look at me and he said, ‘I know what you got.’ [The] first time I saw him, he says, ‘you’ve got paralysis in your spine and in your legs. Did you take the [Johnson & Johnson vaccine] or what other one?’

“He said, ‘I’ve got an antidote for that, a homeopathic antidote for peristalsis.’ And sure enough, it worked. Now, did it work perfectly? No. But what it did do was save my life.”

According to Bath, when she shared the news of this successful treatment with her cardiologist, “She started screaming at me, this nice, gentle woman who isn’t even connected to the vaccine.”

Forced to get vaccine by employer

Bath was initially reluctant to get a COVID-19 vaccine, she said, but was required to get it for employment reasons.

She opted to receive the single-dose J&J vaccine because, “I figured, well, one [dose] is better than two.”

Although Bath acknowledged there was information available advising people with autoimmune conditions to avoid the J&J vaccine, she said she was “in remission for 20 years through natural means.”

But she also believes she wouldn’t necessarily have been better off getting the Pfizer or some other COVID-19 vaccine.

“Who knows? If I was pressured into taking the Pfizer [vaccine], maybe I would have been worse off,” Bath said.

Bath also noted that the specific J&J dose she received came from the Baltimore Emergent BioSolutions manufacturing plant that subsequently was shut down after reports of regulatory problems.

The injuries and adverse effects Bath sustained have been debilitating in terms of her ability to work.

Bath told The Defender:

“I used to work 10-12 hours a day. I have not been able to work in 16 months. My neurologist also refused disability, [putting] me into poverty.

“My greatest fear is being homeless. I’ve happily worked my whole life, never asked for help … I was crying every day and definitely suicidal … I haven’t been able to work and [this experience] totally put me into poverty. I’ve been very close to homelessness a few times … I ran through all my money.”

Fortunately, she said, she discovered the Vaccine Injury/Side Effects Support Groupfeatured last month by The Defender.

Bath said membership in the support group resulted in her “confirming that I was not alone, and that doctors were purposely lying, all over the world,” adding, “Thank God for Catherine’s group,” referring to its founder, Catherine Parker, who also was injured by the J&J vaccine.

“We all share information, symptom, and information on what is helping us,” said Bath, referring to her interactions with other members of the support group.

According to Bath, seeing the large number of participants in such groups and interacting with them has “broken my heart,” but at the same time, has provided a degree of comfort, “knowing that I’m not out of my mind.

“Doctors tell me I’m nuts,” said Bath. “I’ve never seen such meanness in my life,” adding, “You know, friends disappear, family disappears. So thank God for these groups, but I wish they weren’t necessary.”

The support group faces challenges, however, according to Bath — namely, attempted censorship by Facebook, where the group is hosted.

“The fact that we’re connecting — they keep trying to knock us off,” said Bath.

Bath told The Defender that prior to her injuries, she was planning for a new phase in her life — life coaching.

“Helping people, helping prevent Crohn’s disease, helping prevent food poisoning … I already had it set up … and I’d have a full life. It was planned out … I loved every bit of what I was doing.”

Her injuries have delayed but not ended her plan. She told The Defender she has completed a life coach trauma healing certification, adding:

“My assignment is helping people get as better as possible, and I’m getting that extra certification for trauma because we’ve all been traumatized for the last five or six years.

“And to add to that … my two majors now are helping people with Crohn’s disease, but mostly with the vaccine injuries … those are my two goals.”

Through this, Bath hopes that she can sensitize the broader public to what is happening.

“We need the public to know this is not political,” Bath said. “Both sides of the aisle have been hurt, and we are in this together.

She added: “We can’t trust the regulators because they’re all owned by Yale and Harvard and everything else.”


You may also like...