Synagogue & State Inseparable
* If you haven’t already done so, be sure to sign up for our FREE Report & FREE Updates List at bottom of page.
WHY NO SEPARATION OF SYNAGOGUE AND STATE?
By Mike King
.“All The News That Sulzberger’s Propaganda Rag Saw Fit To Distort”
A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
FREE SAMPLE 1 FED RESERVE NOTE
“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”
|FREE SAMPLE DAYSubscribe to the Anti-New York Times and stay on top of world events.|
|TUESDAY / FEBRUARY 26, 2019|
Slimes Caption: Fred Edwords, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said the memorial in Bladensburg, Md., “sends a message of Christian favoritism and exclusion of all others.”NY Times: 40-Foot Cross Divides a Community and Prompts a Supreme Court Battle
|REBUTTAL BYNearly 100 years ago, 1925 to be precise, the citizens of Bladensburg, Md. erected a 40-foot tall stone cross to honor the memory of 49 local young men whose lives were tragically pissed away in Woodrow Wilson’s infamous war for Globalism and Zionism. Now, a group of local atheists want the structure relocated off of public property, or destroyed and replaced with something less offensive to their delicate sensibilities — such as a “slab or “obelisk” as they propose in their Supreme Court brief. The local leader of this anti-Christian crusade, while acknowledging that all of dead soldiers were probably Christians, gives us his twisted reasoning for wanting the monument replaced:From the article: |
“Mr. Edwords, who is challenging the cross, said that ‘it’s probably true that they were all Christians.’But he added that the looming cross, especially when illuminated at night, sends a message about religious favoritism rather than remembrance.‘When you’re driving at night, you don’t see devotion and valor and all that stuff; you just see a giant cross floating in the darkness,” he said. “And that leaves the impression that the city of Bladensburg is a Christian enclave. Now I grant that people who grow up in a Christian environment often don’t think things like that,” he said. “Their Christian privilege makes it to where they can’t easily see how it looks. But for people like me — and Jews and Hindus and Muslims and Buddhists — this tells them they’re outsiders.'”What crap! Hindus, Muslims (who revere Jesus as a holy prophet) and Buddhists couldn’t care a rat’s ass about crosses on public property. Only militant atheists, Satanists, Jews and vampires (but I repeat myself), get all worked up over the sight of a crucifix. 1 & 2. Maryland’s historic post-war “Peace Cross” — erected in 1925 — has suddenly been deemed “offensive” by “the usual suspects” and their “humanist” frontmen. // 3. Expect “Weekend at Ruthie’s” Ginsberg (cough cough) and the other three Supreme Court Jews (Sonia Sotomayor is a crypto “Marrano”) to side with the God-hating plaintiffs. Let’s hope all five of the “conservative” judges will rule with some sanity in the upcoming case. The manipulative kosherized bullshit about “separation of church and state” ™ — which subversive groups such as the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) have used to cleanse the land of all vestiges of Christianity and its positive moral effects — is based on a single out-of-context quote by the brilliant author of the Declaration of Independence and 3rd President of the United States at the time, Thomas Jefferson. As usual, the Marxist-Libtard Axis of Criminal Insanity gets it all ass-backwards. Jefferson, a Deist, was not out to protect the government from Christianity. To the exact contrary, he strove to protect religious practice from government control / interference.Let’s have a look at the full Jefferson letter (an 1802 response written to a group of Christians) in which he reassures them of his protection of their liberties.“GentlemenThe affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. My duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem. (emphasis added)
Jan. 1. 1802″ In other words, the government will not establish / impose a state religion — like the Church of England or the Russian Orthodox Church, for example — on other sects. That’s all that phrase means — nothing more! Not only is the term “separation of church and state” nowhere to be found in either the Declaration of Independence or the U.S. Constitution; but the very letter in which the term appears shows that Jefferson’s words have been taken out-of-context by ACLU Communists in order to promote the religion of Atheism. Of course, it is interesting to note how the religious symbols of a certain group (cough cough) can still find their way onto public property without so much as a peep of complaint from the Communist / Atheist / ACLU Jew lawyer crowd. The National Menorah is a 40-foot tall & 30 foot wide monstrosity erected on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C. It was first lit in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter, and has been erected and lit every year since — growing taller in the process! The annual event includes a music presentation of Hanukkah songs by the U.S. taxpayer-funded United States Army Band. Every year, a Jewish government official or member of the president’s cabinet participates in the lighting of Mega Menorah — a symbol of defiance against western (Greek) assimilation. U.S. governors now issue proclamations in honor of the National Menorah; and now we also have annual Hanukkah and Passover Seder events inside the White House!The Jews — ever the grand masters of rhetorical gymnastics — argue that these stunts are no different than the annual outdoor lighting of the White House Christmas tree, or the annual Easter Egg hunt. Now if we accept, for the sake of argument, the “separation of church and state” ™ nonsense, the flaw in such illogic is that decorated trees and painted eggs do not carry any Christian / religious meaning or value; whereas the lighting of the menorah and the Passover Seder speech are, even for atheistic Jews, important religious practices.The “miraculous” menorah is their “crucifix” — and the Passover blessing and “miracle” speech is their “Our Father.” So, a more accurate comparison would be to the erection of a 40-foot cross on the White House grounds and a presidential recitation of the Lord’s Prayer at the annual easter Egg Hunt. Man oh man and “oy vey!” Can “youse guys” even begin to imagine the deafening magnitude of the “public” shit-storm such acts would kick up?No sir. What’s good for the goose is most certainly not permitted for the Goyim gander. Why not? Because (((they))) OWN this frickin’ country. That’s why!
Separation of synagogue and State? Not a chance! Boobus Americanus 1: I read in today’s New York Times about an upcoming Supreme Court case to decide if a giant post World War I cross erected in 1925 violates the separation of church and state clause of the Constitution.
Boobus Americanus 2: Well, that seems a bit petty. However, if it’s on public property, it is technically illegal. * Editor: Boobus the legal scholar heard that on TV — so it must be true.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS Email address:Comments: email@example.com