The Anti-New York Times: Why Do the Jewish Zionists Hate the BRICs Countries Lifting People Out of Poverty?
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
OCTOBER, 2017 1 FED RESERVE NOTE
“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”
THURSDAY / OCTOBER 26, 2017
New York Times: End of Apartheid in South Africa? Not in Economic Terms
By PETER S. GOODMAN
Political liberation has yet to translate into material gains for blacks. As one woman said, “I’ve gone from a shack to a shack.”
Slimes propagandist Peter Goodman (cough cough) scores a “twofer” (2 hits-in-1) with this highly unflattering, yet very accurate depiction of the hellish part of today’s South Africa. Understand that Globalist swine like Goodwin couldn’t give a rat’s arse about the pathetic plight of South Africa’s growing numbers of poor and chronically unemployed citizens (of any race!), or that nation’s massive wealth gap between the well-connected and the have-nots. No sir. Goodman’s main intent here is to further destabilize a member of the BRICS trade bloc (Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa). That’s the first motive of this assault.
As an added propaganda bonus, the article, in addition to crucifying the inept and corrupt Black Marxist government, also puts the blame for Black poverty on the legacy of the big bad White Man’s Apartheid (segregation) system, which ended nearly a quarter century ago. You see? Goodman strikes the hated BRICS and the hated White Man at the same time — a “twofer.”
Let us analyze and correct a few choice lines of this fiendishly clever mix of truths, lies and omissions. Hazmat suits and goggles on, boys and girls. Into Sulzberger’s cesspool we go.
Two things that a Jewish Supremacist Globalist like Paul Goodman hates — BRICS and White people. His attack on South Africa’s failures (though accurate in many ways) scores a hateful “two-fer” against both.
Goodman: The end of apartheid was supposed to be a beginning. Judith Sikade envisioned escaping the townships, where the government had forced black people to live. She aimed to find work in Cape Town, trading her shack for a home with modern conveniences.
More than two decades later, Ms. Sikade, 69, lives on the garbage-strewn dirt of Crossroads township, where thousands of black families have used splintered boards and metal sheets to construct airless hovels for lack of anywhere else to live.
Analysis: The Marxist Black government of South Africa, in spite of presiding over a resource-rich nation and a skilled upper class of White businessmen, has utterly failed its people. No argument here on that point.
Goodman: In the history of civil rights, South Africa lays claim to a momentous achievement — the demolition of apartheid and the construction of a democracy.
Analysis: Therine lies the problem. “Democracy” gave every illiterate, 60’s IQ slum-dweller and his mother the “right” to vote for that Communist filth, Nelson Mandela. His gang has misruled “the new South Africa” ™ ever since.
1. Nelson Mandela and SA Communist Party boss Joe Slovo (cough cough) 2. Their anti-White triumph has brought misery to many Blacks and Whites.
Goodman: But for black South Africans, who account for three-fourths of this nation of roughly 55 million people, political liberation has yet to translate into broad material gains. Apartheid has essentially persisted in economic form.
Analysis: To maintain the fiction of evil White South Africans, Goodman wants us to believe that the extreme poverty only afflicts “black South Africans.” What he deliberate omits is the shocking reality of Black-on-White murders and fast-growing White poverty. Indeed, about 10% of South African Whites now live in squatter camps — their jobs having been taken from them and given to Blacks.
Goodman: Underlying the anger are deep-seated disparities in wealth. In the aftermath of apartheid, the government left land and other assets largely in the hands of a predominantly white elite.
Analysis: Had the government of South Africa not “left land and other assets largely in the hands of a predominantly white elite” — the situation would be even worse!
Goodman: The government’s resistance to large-scale land transfers reflected its reluctance to rattle international investors.
Analysis: You see, Goodman would have preferred to see the SA government dispossess all Whites, instead of just the lower level wage earners.
Goodman: “It’s a very deep structural problem,” said Ian Goldin, who served as a senior economic adviser to Nelson Mandela when he was president of South Africa, and is now a professor of globalization at the University of Oxford in Britain.
Analysis: So, Ian Goldin (cough cough) “advised Mandela, eh? Him and a whole gaggle of other South African Jewish Communists!
Goodman (quoting Goldin): “The Russians had capitalism before the Soviet Union. Africans lost their rights 300 years ago. It’s a much longer period of subjugation.”
Analysis: Dude! Africans hadn’t even discovered the wheel before the big bad White man arrived! This is not to justify everything that Europeans did, but blaming the White Man for Africa’s poverty ignores the fact the tribes of Africa were as primitive as can be when the Whites arrived. Goldin knows this of course, but his method-of-operation is always to incite Blacks against Whites.
Goodman: Even so, from 1998 to 2008, the economy expanded by roughly 3.5 percent a year, doubling the size of the black middle class.
Analysis: They “doubled the size of the black middle class” mainly by firing middle class Whites and driving them into squatter camps.
THE LOSERS IN “THE NEW SOUTH AFRICA” ™
Murdered farmers and middle class Whites kicked out of their jobs due to strict quotas which favor Blacks, and then forced into squatter camps.
Goodman: The government built millions of homes, extended the reach of clean water and electricity, and handed out cash grants to millions of poor people.
Analysis: On Whitey’s dime.
Goodman: Today, South Africa is a land of astonishing contrasts.
Analysis: The contrast is between the selfish alliance of government-connected Marxist Blacks and their cronie-capitalist White elite partners on the one hand, versus the dirt poor Blacks and suddenly dispossessed Whites on the other. In the grand scheme of things, neither the poor Blacks nor the poor Whites are to blame for the debacle that is “the new South Africa.” ™ The ultimate blame should be assigned to “the usual suspects” — of which the writer, the Leftist Paul Goodman, is a member.
THE WINNERS IN “THE NEW SOUTH AFRICA” ™
1 & 2. The Black professionals and civil service workers who were given the jobs denied or taken away from the Whites whose ancestors created South Africa. 3. The sodomites, multiplied in number due to the “tolerance” ™of the South African government.
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the government of South Africa has failed to undo the horrible economic legacy of Apartheid.
Boobus Americanus 2: Centuries of White privilege will take time to roll back.
Sugar: Do thesse dirt poor Ssouth African ssquatter camp kidss look frickin’ “privileged” to you, Boobuss?
Editor: Heart-breaking, and infuriating. I would adopt them all if I could.
ANYT PAPERBACK / QUARTER 3 / 2017
–– Collect all 11 volumes at Amazon Page of “M S King!”
WEDNESDAY / OCTOBER 25, 2017
The Anti-New York Times: Letter to the Editor
LETTERS TO THE …
Following Monday’s rebuttal piece about China’s “authoritarian” leader, Xi Jinping, and the rapid progress of China, a long-time reader and English ex-pat living in China wrote in to confirm and expand upon what we had published. His letters, coming from first person experience, were extremely enlightening and uplifting — yet a bit heart-breaking at the same time.
We say “uplifting” because of our admiration for China’s positive energy, self-confidence, economic development and cultural advancement. As lovers of humanity, we wish all the peoples / races of the world the best (well, maybe not so much for the usual suspects). But we also describe the letter as “heart-breaking” because it makes the painful sense of loss for us westerners all the more stark and acute. We Europeans once had that very same “mojo” which China is now rediscovering. But a certain “they” (cough cough) took it away from us, and it doesn’t look like we’ll be getting it back anytime soon, if ever.
We read and appreciate all comments / letters which come in — even though we can’t respond to them all — but we generally don’t publish the feedback. But this was too good not to share with “youse guys” (New Jerseyese for the plural of “you”). We don’t know if our English reader would have wanted his name published or not, so we’ll just refer to him as “The “communist” fascist nation which has wisely banished the New York Slimes, the Soros groups, Fakebook and various other Globalist NGO’s from its land. The following comments / letters constitute his full testimonial about the dynamic
BANNED IN CHINA!
Soros (cough cough) — Zuckerberg (cough cough) — Sulzberger (cough cough)
(Images added by the ANYT)
Original Comments from Englishman in China: Damn right! I’ve lived in China for many years. The people here(including myself) have far better quality of lives and are much freer than people living in DEMONcratic England where the people are physically and mental abused on a daily basis.