Strange Encounters in the Woods, Men in Black & the Modern Edgar Cayce
by Admin · Published · Updated
Actual Men in Black on film:
Remote Viewing & Predictions / Homeopathic Psychiatry
Hosted byRichard Syrett
Guests:
Show Audio
About the show
In the first half, clairvoyant and spiritual healer Douglas James Cottrell joined Richard Syrett (Twitter) to discuss quantum meditation: the ability to access the Akashic field to arrive at information beyond conscious knowledge. Other features of this phenomenon include moving backward and forward in time, intuitive understanding, and amplified mind projection and remote viewing. In particular, Cottrell went on, he’s used these abilities to detect health issues and locate missing persons. Despite its source within the human mind, however, quantum meditation doesn’t involve intense concentration or effort; instead, it’s a matter of suspending conscious thought in order to intuitively see the images and information as they present themselves.
Cottrell also offered his prophetic view for the near future. Regarding Russia’s current invasion of Ukraine, he’s envisioned radioactivity in the region that suggests nuclear warfare of some kind. He also sees a shortage of food sometime in the coming months, as well as banking disruptions that will prevent the withdrawal of funds. He does not see a return of pandemic-related shutdowns or a forced adoption of an all-digital currency, however.
In the second hour, Cottrell conducted a live on-air remote viewing experiment, his fifth on the show with Richard. As with his prior experiments, Cottrell placed an everyday object (photo here) on his desktop and invited Richard and the show’s listeners to envision what it was. Reports from callers included a picture of the Earth and an alarm clock, while Richard’s initial impressions were that of a rectangular object with a shiny surface.
*****************
A researcher and practitioner of homeopathy and acupuncture, Jerry M. Kantor was the guest in the latter half. Calling chronic illness “the body’s failure to complete a detoxifying effort,” he explained that homeopathic remedies make such conditions manageable and treatable. The substances used in such treatments, he continued, can include a multitude of natural substances including plants, minerals, and even gases. And although on a molecular level, these substances may all but disappear during the process of their extensive dilution, it’s the energy they possess that remains, making the difference in their effectiveness.
But the benefits of homeopathy don’t address physical ailments alone, Kantor said: the entire person —including one’s personality, mind, and soul— are intertwined with the effects of the healing substance on the body. In this way, Kantor claimed, homeopathy has the potential to work on an existential level. A woman experiencing anxiety about her work/life balance, for example, may find that a homeopathic treatment affects that issue, along with skin or gynecological issues.
MASS SHOOTINGS
The Ghosts of Norway: How the Victims Tell Us About Murderer Anders Breivik
How victims of mass murder tell us about their killers
Posted August 2, 2011
-
Share
-
Tweet
-
Share
-
Email
So much has been written about Anders Breivik, but little has focused on the victims of the atrocities. As a criminal profiler, the first thing you want to examine at the crime scene is the victim. If you listen, the dead do ‘speak.’ The victim will tell you who murdered him. All you have to is ‘ask.’
In the Norway killings, the victims were mostly teenagers who were helpless and confined. An island was specifically used to make sure the targets could not get away. Those killed were said to be the children of political leaders of the liberal party. The victims were shot at very close range as the killer enticed his targets with a disguise. In looking at the circumstances and victim choice, you learn all you need to know about the offender.
First, he chose young victims. The majority of serial killers go after younger victims. Why? Because they are not as worldly and do not know as much about danger. They are more trusting, and therefore, they make easier targets. Though Breivik is not a serial killer as far as we know, he is a mass murderer. He chose his victims well in that he picked those who were impressionable and less guarded.
Second, Breivik intentionally isolated his victims on an island. This is a brilliant strategy. How better to trap your victims? If they cannot get to a boat to escape, they are sitting targets. This is exactly what happened. The youngsters had nowhere to run, and as he continued his killing spree, Breivik, dressed as a policeman and approached the victims. As they were younger and less cautious, they went to the uniformed ‘officer’ for help. This is when he shot them.
When a killer chooses victims who are already helpless, it tells the profiler that the offender is very unsure of his ability to subdue victims in a fair fight. In other words, Breivik did not think he could kill his victims unless they were at an extreme disadvantage. Someone like this has low self esteem and tends toward obsessive compulsive traits. Breivik certainly was someone who would demonstrate repetitive behaviors in his daily life. He would become agitated and upset if he could not perform these behaviors. His anger would be far out of proportion to any trigger. This is a man who got furious if he thought someone insulted him. Those who knew him would say it was uncomfortable to be around him. Such offenders are difficult because a person would never know which Breivik would show up day to day. Sometimes he would be overly calm, and other times, he would explode with anger.
Third, the victims were said to be the children of liberal leaders. Breivik believed that liberal leaders were destroying his people because of multiculturalism and immigration. By killing the children, Breivik was snuffing out future harm to his people. Kill the children….kill the future leaders. This is his viewpoint. The children of his enemies would grow up to become his enemies. Therefore, they had to die. Additionally, he was making a bloody point by selecting the young. He knew that killing teens and others would create more damage. People would be more upset. Thus, he inflicted the greatest harm that he could.
When looking at Breivik’s victims, it is obvious that Breivik was a coward. He believed he was unable to fight fair, so he created a scenario where he could not lose. The children could not hurt him. This made him feel ultra -powerful, which fed his narcissism. Preying upon children is a strategy more typically used by females. In other words, he chose victims that a female would usually chose. This speaks volumes about his low self esteem. He was a man who struggled with how he viewed himself. Though he desperately wanted to be important, he was not. Because he lacked confidence, he selected the weakest victims. By picking the easiest victims, Breivik knew his death toll would be high. Thus, he knew he would be successful, and he knew his message would get out. He knew the world would listen.
There are others like Breivik who are waiting to determine if the world actually listened. Their view is if the liberals do not change their wicked ways, then more attacks will have to take place. Breivik said it was kind to kill as many as possible. This is because in his opinion, the more he killed, the more likely people would listen to him and change. Like minded individuals feel the same way, and if they see that Breivik’s ‘plea’ is ignored, they will strike. This is why there will be more attacks by this type of terrorist. It may not occur in Norway, yet it will occur. These types of predators will believe that if they kill enough of their enemies, then the world will change. Thus, there will be others ready to step up and become the next boogeyman. Great stress coupled with a lack of coping skills can create a most vicious monster. The only question is: who will be next?