Russia has just retaliated against the Jewish Ukraine terrorist regime with air strikes in Kiev and other Ukrainian cities.
Zelensky’s office was reportedly struck with a missile.
This faggot reporter for the BBC had to take cover as he was broadcasting his stupid anti-Russia propaganda.
They’ve been hitting all sorts of Ukrainian government targets along with their energy infrastructure.
The fact of the matter is that Russia could have done this any time they wanted. This is why many people including myself thought that Russia was going to decisively win this conflict in short order. They just decided not to use their full capabilities in order to minimize casualties and do their best to try and preserve Ukraine’s infrastructure.
In retrospect, this may not have been the best decision but there may have been various political reasons as to why Vladimir Putin chose to go this route. It’s obviously important to Putin that the rest of the non-Western world can at least understand his actions. If he leveled Kiev he may have lost support from some of his allies.
Quite frankly, what Putin did here was minimal. He has the capabilities to destroy Kiev and other Ukrainian cities. That’s what the United States and its coalition did to Baghdad back in 2003. They just leveled the entire city.
Remember the “Shock and Awe” campaign?
The same people whining about these strikes on Kiev weren’t complaining about “Shock and Awe.”
Either way, this was a necessary response to the attack on the Crimean bridge a few days ago. I doubt those faggots who were laughing and joking about that bridge attack are making jokes now.
Putin Says Today’s Strikes a Response to Ukrainian Terrorism
Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a statement about today’s strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure. He said that they were a response to Ukrainian terrorism and vowed that there’d be more to come if these terrorist attacks continue.
RT:
Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that any further Ukrainian “terrorist” assaults on Russian soil will be met with a significant military response. He was speaking after a wave of missiles struck Ukraine on Monday morning.
Putin confirmed that Russian troops carried out “massive strikes with long-range precision weapons on Ukrainian objects of energy, and military control and communications.” The response came two days after an explosion damaged the strategic Crimean Bridge, for which officials in Kiev claimed responsibility.
“If there are further attempts to conduct terrorist attacks on our soil, Russia will respond firmly and on a scale corresponding to the threats created against Russia,” Putin added.
Earlier in the day, multiple regions of Ukraine came under missile strikes, with at least 11 key infrastructure facilities damaged, according to Ukrainian Prime Minister Denis Shmygal. Putin stated that Russia was retaliating for a number of attempts to strike Russian infrastructure that have been attributed to Kiev.
Among other things, Ukraine has damaged high-voltage power lines that transmit electricity generated by the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant, tried to sabotage the TurkStream natural gas pipeline, and was behind Saturday’s explosion that damaged the Crimean Bridge, Putin stated.
“The Kiev regime has been using terrorist methods for a very long time,” the Russian president said, citing targeted assassinations of public figures, the indiscriminate shelling of Donbass cities and of the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant as examples of such actions.
“De facto, the Kiev regime has put itself on par with international terrorist groups, the most odious of them. Leaving such crimes without a response has become impossible,” he stressed, before confirming that Russia had attacked Ukrainian infrastructure.
Unlike leaders in the West, Putin delivered a very clear and concise explanation for his actions. The Kiev regime has been engaging in assassinations, terrorist acts and other sabotage operations against Russia. It is a reasonable response. Quite frankly, they are lucky he didn’t do more.
(Goofy) John Bolton Says US Could Kill Vladimir Putin
John Bolton has been all over the media making a number of crazy statements. The latest crazy statement he made was him saying that the United States would kill Vladimir Putin if he used a nuclear weapon in the Ukraine.
I’m not even sure why Putin would use nukes in the Ukraine. He doesn’t need to as evidenced by the damage their recent conventional strikes did to their infrastructure earlier this week.
The nuclear deterrent is primarily for defense against US/NATO forces. Everybody knows this.
Assassinating Putin would be a whole other thing. Even if you assume the US could feasibly do this, it would be a strategic mistake. Putin is actually a moderate figure. If he is removed, there’s a very good chance that Russia would be taken over by hardliners seeking revenge for his assassination. But quite frankly, the chances of the US even being able to assassinate Putin while not impossible, is quite low.
All this stuff Bolton is saying is just goofy and stupid nonsense.
NATO Effectively Admits They Are at War With Russia
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg made some strange statements the other day about how a Russian victory in the Ukraine would be a defeat for NATO.
RT:
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg told reporters on Tuesday that a military victory for Russia in Ukraine would spell defeat for the entire Western alliance.
However, despite providing “unprecedented support” to Kiev, Stoltenberg still claims that the US-led bloc is not a party to the conflict.
Addressing reporters on the eve of a meeting of NATO defense ministers, Stoltenberg declared that continued arms shipments to Ukraine are vital to ensure “that Ukraine wins the battle, the war against the invading Russian forces.”
However, this assistance has come at a price for the alliance’s own militaries. Germany’s weapons and ammo stocks have been critically depleted since late August. The same month, the Wall Street Journal reported that the US’ stockpiles of 155mm artillery ammunition were “uncomfortably low.” Asked whether weakening its own forces to strengthen Ukraine’s is a wise policy, Stoltenberg described the conflict in Ukraine as existential to the alliance.
“If [Russian President Vladimir] Putin wins, that is not only a big defeat for the Ukrainians, but it will be the defeat, and dangerous, for all of us,” he said.
NATO is heavily invested in Ukraine, with the alliance’s members providing training, intelligence capability, and tens of billions of dollars worth of weapons to the Ukrainian military. Despite this “unprecedented support,” Stoltenberg has repeatedly claimed that “NATO is not a party to the conflict.”
Stoltenberg is speaking out both sides of his mouth. By saying that a Russian victory in the Ukraine would be a defeat for NATO, he is effectively admitting that they are at war with Russia. At the same time, he is claiming that they aren’t a party to the conflict.
Well, NATO is absolutely a party to the conflict. Stoltenberg is admitting that NATO is. If they weren’t a party to the conflict, the outcome of the Russia-Ukraine situation would be of no consequence to them. Of course, we already know they are a party to the conflict with the unlimited weapons and aid they’ve poured into the Jew-run Kiev dictatorship.
Quite frankly, I’m really tired of seeing faggots like Stoltenberg engage in this duplicity. Instead of using all this cryptic language to fool people, just be up front with what’s going on. It’s no wonder nobody trusts these people. They can’t be straight forward with anything.
Compare a stooge like Stoltenberg to Russia’s political leaders who always speak in a direct and straight forward manner. This is a big part of the reason why the world has not sided with the West in this stupid war.
