Targeted Individual Gang Stalking MKULTRA…..Military/CIA Operation
Shad Budge Productions 12.1K subscribersSubscribe Targeted Individual Gang Stalking MKULTRA Monarch Mind Control Dr. John Hall Microchip Transhumanism CIA RCMP CSIS ***NOTE*** If you watched the short version already, skip the introduction. 0:00 – Introduction 1:54:42 – Your government just wants the best for you! 2:42:23 – Disinformation, fake news, propaganda, character assassination 3:20:07 – Targeted individuals (whistleblowers, doctors, victims, patents, laws, precedence, etc) 6:05:22 – Mind reading technology, brain implants, direct neural interfaces 7:25:28 – Artificial Intelligence 7:59:01 – Transhumanism 8:22:13 – MKULTRA (they totally stopped research and development on this in 1973, and will never attempt it again…) 9:42:10 – Conclusion
PLEASE sign our petition in support of the Neuro-Specific Human Rights Bill here: http://chng.it/pkCvhRMS Watch our latest video describing the bill here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFLBr… Our website: http://www.globalneuroethics.com Our GoFundMe campaign: https://www.gofundme.com/global-neuro… Please help us enact the Neuro-Specific Human Rights Bill into legislation by sharing the links above on all social media platforms!
Rapid advancements in human neuroscience and neurotechnology open unprecedented possibilities for accessing, collecting, sharing and manipulating information from the human brain. Such applications raise important challenges to human rights principles that need to be addressed to prevent misuse or unintended negative consequences. This proposal assesses the implications of emerging neurotechnology applications in the context of the human rights framework and suggests that existing human rights are not sufficient to respond to these emerging issues. After analysing the relationship between neuroscience and human rights, we identify four new neuro-specific human rights that will be vital in the effort of protecting the human brain: the right to cognitive liberty, the right to mental privacy, the right to mental integrity, and the right to psychological continuity. The volume and variety of neurotechnology applications is rapidly increasing inside and outside the clinical and research setting. The ubiquitous distribution of cheaper, scalable and easy-to-use neuroapplications has the potential of opening unprecedented opportunities at the brain-machine interface level and making neurotechnology intricately embedded in our everyday life. While this technological trend may generate immense advantage for society in many ways, its implications for ethics and the law remain largely unexplored. We argue that in the light of the disruptive change that neurotechnology is determining in the digital ecosystem, the normative terrain should be urgently prepared to prevent misuse or unintended negative consequences. In addition, given the fundamental character of the neurocognitive dimension, we argue that such normative response should not exclusively focus on tort law but also on foundational issues at the level of human right law.
The freedom of thought, freedom from slavery, torture and inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment are regarded by international human rights law as not subject to any exceptions and, therefore, as absolute rights. Absolute rights cannot be limited for any reason. No circumstance justifies a qualification or limitation of absolute rights. Absolute rights cannot be suspended or restricted, even during a declared state of emergency. The right to cognitive liberty, the right to mental privacy, the right to mental integrity, and the right to psychological continuity should also be enacted into law as absolute rights.
