All These Pro-War [riors] Who Never Fought in a War Owned By ZIONIST Israel Money aka Rothschild Money


A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,

Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines




“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”




Homes on Pawleys Island, S.C., some damaged in the aftermath of Hurricane Dorian last month.

NY Times:Rich Counties Get More Help to Escape Climate Risk, New Data

REBUTTAL BYAnother day, another “study” about this or that dire consequence of Global Warming  / Climate Change . This particular paper, farted out of the rectum of the University of Miami’s Rosenstiel School (cough cough) of Marine and Atmospheric Science, accomplishes a Marxist “twofer.” In addition to spreading — by way of prior assumption fallacy — the usual alarmist nonsense about sea-level rise and more frequent hurricanes, the “study” concludes that the big bad “rich” are given preferential treatment when it comes to mitigating “climate risk.” This useless study and the subsequent media hype about it dovetails nicely with Loony Lizzy Warren’s recent proposal to fight “environmental racism.” ( ™ pending)Katharine J. Mach, the lead “professor” behind this propaganda paper, claims that wealthier beach communities are given prefernce in accessing Federal “buyout” funds and relocation assistance after a weather disaster which the professorette, as well as the Slimes scribbler, automatically assumes to be related to “Climate Change”   1. Young Professorette Katherine Mach — not bad looking at all, sweetie. Not bad. In a sane world, instead of playing “scientist” while wasting time and grant money on stupid “studies,” Katie would be at home making babies, cleaning house, dolling herself up and preparing suppers for a nice handsome and happy young man. // 2. Loony Lizzy of 1/1024 Cherokee fame — the new Demonrat front-runner of the month –just started promoting similar nonsense about “environmentalism racism.” // 3. Classic Marxism: “Climate Change” is now an issue of race and class. There is a line in this article which really caught our attention. See if you can infer what’s wrong with the observation:“In many coastal states, flood-prone areas continue to see the highest rates of home construction. “Hmmmm. Now, if the idea of rising sea-levels and intensified storms in the near future is truly the stuff of “settled science” ™ which the ass-clowns of Academia and Fake News insist that it is; then why are mortgage lenders — as well as the institutional investors who purchase loans on the secondary market — continuing to finance “the highest rates of home construction” in coastal areas with 15 and 30 year mortgages? Bankers are smart guys — and every major bank & brokerage house in America proudly states that they are doing their part to fight “Climate Change “. (Enter the name of any large bank or brokerage house and “Climate Change” into a search engine and see).Yet not a single lender has pulled out of or even restricted its coastal lending. Don’t they realize that even a slight but observable change in sea-levels would instantly trigger a panic-collapse in the value of collateralized real estate assets? Or can it be that all of their high-sounding corporate propaganda about “concern” over “Climate Change ” is all fake — and intended to keep the commie crazies at bay?   Stable-valued collateral is critical to bank balance sheets. That is why — even if a borrower has excellent credit — a bank won’t provide a mortgage for the purchase of a boarded-up crack house in Baltimore. If the banks and the Wall Street investors actually believed in the environmental alarmism which they claim to be so concerned about, they would have stopped making and re-buying 10, 15 and 30-year loans on beach-front properties by now — or at least added some steep interest rate bumps and/or increased downpayment requirements. The reason for the total lack of concern is that they know it’s all a hoax and that the properties are NOT at unusual risk. “Across the pond,” in the severely libtarded European province of France, even the boy-king Emmanuel Maricon (not a typo, Spanish for faggot) of “Paris Climate Accords”  fame cannot deny that the properties along the French Riviera continue to be in high demand and eagerly financed by banking giants like Monte Paschi and various Rothschild-affiliated institutions. Imagine that! The very same money-grubbing Rothschilds who created and funded the Global Warming  / Climate Change ™ hoax haven’t the slightest concern about long-term beachfront financing, nor do they seem worried about one their own personal residences located on the French Riviera.And further north in the clinically insane Sweden of Greta “How Dare You” Thunberg, coastal properties are more than holding their value and attracting finance there too. Money talks, as they say — and the big money boys, by way of their heavy long-term financing of coastal construction, are telling the more astute among us, quite clearly: “Global Warming  / Climate Change ™ is a hoax!”   1. The libtards and money lenders of the French Riviera don’t seem too concerned about their long term beachfront investments. // 2. A Rothschild home in the French Riviera. // 3. David de Rothschild of Britain wrote “The Global Warming Survival Handbook.” Ya better warn your cousins in France, David. Boobus Americanus 1: I read in today’s New York Times that wealthier communities can access money to deal with the effects of Climate Change much easier than poorer areas.Boobus Americanus 2: Climate Change, bad. … Racism, bad.
        Editor: Boobus just bought a vacation home at the Jersey shore.*COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS  Email address:Comments:  

Image result for trump syria

Time Magazine:Israelis Watch U.S. Abandon Kurds, and Worry: Who’s Next?

REBUTTAL BYLots and lots of butt-hurt emanating from the highest quarters of International Globalism and International Zionism over Trump’s surprise move to pull out of Northern Syria and “abandon” the rebel Kurds in the process. That the One-Worlders despise Trump is not news; but for the sake of any remaining Trump-haters among our readership, this attack piece by David Halbfinger (cough cough) should (we hope) cause them to reconsider their deeply-held belief that Trump, though not a Globalist-Marxist, is still Israel’s slave. From the article:“President Trump’s abrupt order to withdraw American troops there and abandon Kurdish forces, who have been stalwart American allies against the Islamic State, set off clanging alarm bells among officials in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. And for a simple reason: If such a betrayal could befall the Kurds, Israelis from across the political spectrum are suddenly asking, what prevents the same from befalling another staunch American ally?” (emphasis added)
From whence this sudden love for the stateless Kurds, by the way? Dating as far back as World War I, the US / UK “foreign policy establishment” (for which, Sulzberger’s Slimes serves as propaganda mouthpiece) has cruelly played the Kurds for chumps by always, with the false promise of giving them a state — inciting them to revolt against Ottoman Turkey, Iraq or Syria but NEVER delivering.    Knuckle-headed Kurds; played for fools 7 times over the past 100 years — yet Charlie Kurd still falls for the “fight-for-us-in-exchange-for-statehood” trick.

 The detestable Dore Gold, a former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations and top foreign-policy official under the suddenly neutered Benjamin Satanyahoo, whined in an interview yesterday: “I feel like a Kurd today.” And speaking of Satanyahoo, have “youse guys” noticed how Trump has dropped the man he once pretended to adore like a hot matzoball?  He never even called Bibi after the Israeli election which clipped his wings! Our favorite paragraph from this Slimes piece says it all:A knife in our back,” screamed the headline over a column by Shimon Shiffer in Yediot Ahronot, Israel’s biggest mainstream paper. “The conclusion we draw needs to be unequivocal: Trump has become unreliable for Israel. He can no longer be trusted,” the column read.Yes, as he did in the shark-infested world of New York City real estate, the Maestro has out-Jewed the Jew  —- and the Jew ain’t happy about it. More delightful headlines, direct from the major mouthpieces of the shitty little state: Haaretz: Trump’s Decision to Abandon Syria’s Kurds Is Bad News for All U.S. Regional AlliesHaaretz: Israel Surprised by Trump’s Decision to WithdrawHaaretz: Trump’s Decision to Abandon Syria’s Kurds is BadJerusalem Post: After Trump’s Decision, Israel Cannot Depend on AnyoneJerusalem Post: Trump’s Syria Plan: Disaster in the MakingJerusalem Post: Trump Gives Turkey Green Light to Take Over SyriaTimes of Israel: U.S. Pullout From Syria Puts Israel at RiskYedioth Ahronoth: Trump’s Decision is a Defeat for IsraelYedioth Ahronoth: A Victory for Iran, a Defeat for Israel
Israel Today: A Catastrophic Mistake
  As vomit-inducing as Trump’s overt ass-kissing of (((them))) was to behold — in the final analysis, the posturing served the purpose of positioning him to make the moves he is making now because no one can say that he is “anti-Israel.” To a newbie, all of this “oy veying” might give the impression that the Israelis are now afraid for their safety. In reality, it is not fear of Iran, nor Russia, nor Syria, nor Turkey, nor Hezbollah (Lebanon) that’s got the usual suspects doing their usual hand-wringing. No sir. What the ultra-Zionists are pissed-off about is the realization that the shitty little state will, henceforth, be confined to its stolen kennel and not an acre more of another nation’s land. With its U.S. attack-bitch giving up its foothold in Syria, Israel is boxed in by a mighty coalition. We shall see if this new state of affairs helps lead to a just deal with the Palestinians — but as for a U.S. war for Israeli expansion, that dream is over. Thanks Mr. President.Even more telling than the reactions of the Israeli Piranha Press were the swift condemnations from some of Zion’s reliable Gentile frontmen in the United States. Though all generally pro-Trump, Christian-Zionist televangelist Pat Robertson, as well as FOX talking heads Kennedy Montgomery and Brian Kilmeade all slammed Trump’s “betrayal” of the Kurds (as if anyone give’s a rat’s ass about the Kurds!). It will be interesting to see if some of these Israel Firster pro-Trumpers hop off the Trump Train — or opportunistically stay on board as Trump grows stronger and stronger.There was a post made by Q Anon (Military Intelligence) 19 months ago: “We are saving Israel for last.” More and more, that mysterious “crumb” is starting to make sense.  Worried that peace may finally take hold in the Middle East, (((he))) — feigning love for the Kurds — has activated his talking goys “on the right” to trash Trump for pulling out of Syria and leaving the Kurds “vulnerable” to the Turks. **** 1. To neutralize the false accusation that he is allowing Turkey to crush the Kurds, The Maestro did his usual strategic act on Twitter — threatening to “devastate Turkey’s economy” if they harm the Kurds.2 & 3. Trump really likes and respects Turkish “strongman” Recip Erdogan — whose colorful Israel-bashing and “anti-Semitism” is well known (here). ***
This just in…. From Trump’s Twitter “The United States has spent EIGHT TRILLION DOLLARS fighting and policing in the Middle East. Thousands of our Great Soldiers have died or been badly wounded. Millions of people have died on the other side. GOING INTO THE MIDDLE EAST IS THE WORST DECISION EVER MADE…..
….IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY! We went to war under a false & now disproven premise, WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. There were NONE! Now we are slowly & carefully bringing our great soldiers & military home. Our focus is on the BIG PICTURE! THE USA IS GREATER THAN EVER BEFORE!”
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in today’s New York Times that Israel is worried about Trump’s pullout from Syria.Boobus Americanus 2: He is betraying the Kurds to the Turkish dictator.
        St. Sugar: Boobuss, you sanctimoniouss simpleton! Nobody cares about the frickin’ Kurdss — leasst of all, you!
 Editor: Boobus wouldn’t know a Syrian Kurd from a Bean Curd.
*COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS  Email address:Comments: 

Image result for colin powell new york times on trump

Time Magazine:Colin Powell: The Republican Party Needs To ‘Get a Grip’ and Stand Up to Trump

REBUTTAL BYWell, well, well — look at what the Deep State has dragged out of mothballs to dump on Trump. It’s none other than the Magic Mulatto — the military “genius” who brought the world the genocidal “Highway of Death” in Gulf War I, and then, as Secretary of State a dozen years later, followed up on that montrous infamy by giving a crucial assist to the Bush-Cheney Mafia in bringing about the disastrous Iraq War II. Boys and girls, the oh-so-estimable creation of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) — put your hands together for Colon Rectum Bowell! (cue the trumpets of Mount Olympus)Glib as always while speaking smoothly at a forum with contemptible Pakistani Globalist, Fareed Zakaria (CFR) and the equally odious Madeline the Murderess Albright (CFR), Colon Bowell had this to say:
“They (the Republican Party) need to get a grip, and when they see things that aren’t right they need to say something about it. Because our foreign policy is a shambles right now, in my humble judgement. And I see things happening that are hard to understand.”Plugging the above comment into our computerized Globalese-to-English translation engine yielded the following result:Translation: The Globalist wing of the Republican Party has got to find a way to stop Trump. Peace and stability are breaking out all over the world and that’s very bad for our Globalist designs.”   1 & 2. 1991: The Affirmative Action general eagerly and senselessly slaughtered thousands of Iraqi troops and civilians as they desperately fled from the mighty US air-power on “The Highway of Death.” // 2003: As Secretary of State under Bush II, Bowell’s undeserved stature, protective pigmentation, and silky smooth rap enabled him to get away with selling a ridiculously dishonest “Dog & Pony” uranium show at the UN — a stunt which gave the War Party the protective cover needed to finally launch the disastrous war.  * As an Army Major during the Vietnam War in 1968, Bowell also helped to cover up the infamous My Lai Massacer. (here) Let us review the “shambles” of Trump’s foreign policy as compared to what he inherited in 2017 following the 28-year reign of ruin of Bush I, Clinton, Bush II & Obongo — a span of terrors which included perpetual wars and proxy wars — and culminated with George Soros himself cryptically threatening Russia and China with World War 3. (here)
Syria / ISIS
Assad in danger / Threat of confrontation between US & Russia
War is over, ISIS crushed, US troops coming homeKorean Peninsula
Threat of new Korean War always present and dangerous.
Trump & Lil’ Kim getting along. North & South Korea in friendly talks. Trump actually set foot on North Korean soil.East Ukraine – Russia
CIA-Ukraine killing Russian-speaking East Ukrainians — baiting Putin to invade and trigger war with NATO
Russia and Ukraine talking. Trump establishing good relations with both.
“The Asian Pivot” (against China)
US organizing and/or arming Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Australia, Philippines & Vietnam in an allied aggressive posture against ChinaRelations between China and Pacific nations vastly improved. Trump & Xi get along very well.
 How about them “shambles,” eh Colon? Even Africa seems to have calmed down — not surprising given that terror groups like “Boko Haram” were CIA fronts. And now the ‘Greater Israel” Zionists and their Israel Firster operatives in America are openly whining about Trump’s decision to withdraw from Syria completely. From the Jerusalem PostHeadline (October 7, 2019): Can Israel Trust the U.S. After Syria Withdrawal?
 “The US surprise decision to announce that it would withdraw from an area along the Syrian border and enable a Turkish military operation into northern Syria raises many questions about long-term US policy in the Middle East. It is also concerning to Jerusalem because both Iran, an enemy of Israel, and Turkey, which excoriates Israel regularly at international forums, appear to gain as the US retreat.”
 The observable geo-political situation is very clear. In a world which, less than three years ago, had been on a collision course toward World War 3 — four potentially catastrophic trip-wires have been skillfully deactivated. Peace is at hand, and Council on Foreign Relations scum like Colon Bowel don’t like it one bit.
 Remember the bad old days?   

1. 2013: Secretary of State Killary: “Russia and China will pay a price for standing up for the Assad regime.” //  2. 2013: McCain the Insane unleashed chaos in Ukraine. // 3. Soros: 2016: “If there is conflict between China and a military ally of the United States, like Japan, then it is not an exaggeration to say that we are on the threshold of a third world war….. there is a real danger that China will align itself with Russia politically and militarily, and then the threat of third world war becomes real.”   *   1. McCain with ISIS in Syria // 2. Obongo’s “Asian Pivot” was a provocation of China. // 3. North Korea vs South-Korea: A 60 year flash-point — now calmer than ever.  Bowell’s empty words serve as a stark warning as to what will happen when Trump leaves office, probably in 2025 — barring some major Q-Anon-related political shake-up / swamp-draining / voting bloc realignments which would block the Globalists from retaking the White House post-Trump, that is. A cleaning-up and restructuring of the “shambles” which Trump is making of the world would mean a return to perpetual war and revolution in the Middle East; renewed animosity between NATO and Russia in Europe, and a return to mischief by the CIA and its vassals in the Asian Pacific and Korean Peninsula.  If the awarding of the coveted Nobel Peace Prize were a legitimate honor instead of a Globalist propaganda spectacle — Trump and Putin would be named co-winners this coming Friday. As it stands, the scuttlebutt among Marxists and libtards “in the know” is that this year’s medallion (along with a $1.1 million cash award) will be going to the angry little Communist actress from Sweden — Greta “How Dare You” Thunberg of the children’s “Global Climate Strike” fame. —- Sick world.   .
 Candidate Trump in 2016: “Wouldn’t it be nice, if we got along with Russia, and China — and all these countries? Wouldn’t it be nice?”  ***ADDENDUM***Colon and Killary — as thick as theives!Are you hiding something too, Mr. Bowell? Is that why you are suddenly speaking out against Trump?
Below is a conspiratorial E-mail exchange between ex-State Secretary Bowell and then-current Secretary Killary. The two discuss how to conceal electronic communications while on the job — which is against the law!  * Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Colin Powell said that Trump’s foreign policy was in shambles. Boobus Americanus 2: Colin Powell — good. 
St. Sugar: Boobuss, you TV-worsshipping cretin! How can you so strongly condemn the Iraq War disaster in one breath — and then praisse one of the key assholes who treasonously lied uss into that war in the next? Editor: It’s known as “double-think” — the ability to hold two contradictory beliefs at the same time. It’s common among people who are unable to make connections and inferences between data points.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS  Email address:Comments: E-mail:
Image result for dead american world war 1

 Army recruits filled a street in New York in April 1917 soon after President Woodrow Wilson declared war on Germany. Many would be killed and dumped in ditches.New York Times:Should America Have Entered World War I?By MICHAEL KAZIN

REBUTTAL BYAs far as historical accounts go, this particular piece about America’s entry in World War I, submitted to Sulzberger’s Slimes by Georgetown University History Professor and”noted author” Michael Kazin (cough cough), isn’t so bad. Nonetheless, in spite of its relative objectivity, some important elements are missing. The depleted “Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times is pleased to add a bit of much-needed muscle to this skeletal narrative. The “distinguished” Professor Kazin from Georgetown only gets it half-right. The B-student party-boy from Rutgers gets it 100%.(Yet Kazin rakes in millions of dollars while we have to plead for donations and book sales! (hint-hint) Go figure.) Kazin: In 1917, Congress voted to enter what was then the largest and bloodiest war in history. Four days earlier, President Woodrow Wilson had sought to unite a sharply divided populace with a stirring claim that the nation “is privileged to spend her blood and her might for the principles that gave her birth and happiness and the peace which she has treasured.”Analysis: Nothing wrong with what Kazin wrote in those two sentences, but get a load of Woody Wilson gleefully spewing idiotic platitudes about “spending the blood” of young American men for the sake of “principles” and “peace.” Disgusting.
Kazin: The war lasted only another year and a half, but in that time, an astounding 117,000 American soldiers were killed and 202,000 wounded.Analysis: Horrible numbers, yet only a fraction of what each of the major European powers lost in that bloodbath. What a tragic waste!
Kazin: Still, most Americans know little about why the United States fought in World War I, or why it mattered…World War I is less easy to explain (than World War II).Analysis: Actually, Professor Pointyhead,World War I is very easy to explain. Here it is in just 152 words*****The jealous British and French wanted to take out their German economic competitor.The Russians allied themselves with Britain and France because they wanted to take Constantinople (aka Istanbul) from Turkey.The Jewish Globalists wanted to restructure the sovereign states and empires of Europe along Communist and/or “democratic” lines — while the Jewish Zionists (many of whom were also Globalists) wanted to crush the Turkish Empire (which was allied with Germany & Austria-Hungary) so that Palestine could be stolen on their behalf.Toward those evil ends, the main states of Europe were pitted against each other in a game of mutual destruction in which the sole innocent party was Germany. Under false pretenses, the United States — under the Jewish-controlled Woodrow Wilson — was manuevered into the war on the side of Britain and France, only after the British agreed to steal Palestine from Turkey and allow Jews to start settling there (Balfour Declaration).*****Bada bing, bada boom — done! What was so hard about that?Kazin: America intervened nearly three years after it began, and the “doughboys,” as our troops were called, engaged in serious combat for only a few months. More Americans in uniform died away from the battlefield — thousands from the Spanish flu — than with weapons in hand. Analysis: Kazin neglects to mention that the “Spanish”-flu (which actually originated at a US Army base in Kansas) had all the indications of a US-engineered bio-weapon — one that killed many German / Austro-Hungarian soldiers before getting out of hand and killing as many as 75-100 MILLION people worldwide!Kazin: After victory was achieved, Wilson’s audacious hope of making a peace that would advance democracy and national self-determination blew up in his face when the Senate refused to ratify the treaty he had signed at the Palace of Versailles.Analysis: Kazin makes it sound as if Wilson was a well-meaning idealist who screwed things up. In reality, Wilson (a black-mailed puppet of the Big Jews), wasn’t out to “advance democracy and self-determination.” Those high-sounding platitudes were just bits of bait to lure in starry-eyed suckers. The real plan for the post-war world was to begin the drive towards world government — a New World Order whose real purpose, ironically, is and has always been to impose a global structure that is very anti-democratic and anti– “national self determination.” “…Occasionally, on a Saturday morning in the summer of 1912, Bernard Baruch would walk into the Democratic Headquarters with Woodrow Wilson in tow, leading him like one would a poodle on a string. Wilson would be quite solemn-faced in appearance….According to my friend Wilson would be given his special “indoctrination course” in politics, by several of the top advisers assembled there. The course consisted chiefly of outlining to him and his agreeing in principle to: Aiding and pushing the projected Federal Reserve Bank Legislation through Congress when Paul Warburg approved the final draft of the opposed Act, then being worked on….(And) if called upon, to lend a sympathetic ear and aid indicated “policy” if war should break out in Europe….Wilson dutifully received and absorbed his indoctrination, shook hands all around, and then departed….”— From: FDR: My Explited Father-in-Law, By Curtis Dall, son-in-law of FDR (Image 3) Kazin: But attention should be paid. America’s decision to join the Allies was a turning point in world history. It altered the fortunes of the war and the course of the 20th century — and not necessarily for the better.Analysis: The professor gets one right.
Kazin: Its entry most likely foreclosed the possibility of a negotiated peace among belligerent powers that were exhausted from years mired in trench warfare.Analysis: Correct! Britain and France were seriously considering Germany’s request to simply stop the war and return to the pre-war status quo. It was only US entry (engineered by the usual suspects) that encouraged the Allies to drag out the war until the “Yanks” could arrive.
Kazin: Although the American Expeditionary Force did not engage in combat for long, the looming threat of several million fresh troops led German generals to launch a last, desperate series of offensives. When that campaign collapsed, Germany’s defeat was inevitable.Analysis: True, but Kazin omits the reason why the great German Spring Offensive of 1918 (after stunning initial success) ultimately fizzled out and failed — namely, because Jewish-Marxist-Zionist Labor Union leaders called for factory strikes right when Germany was about to win the war before the Yanks arrived. Adding to the internal subversion were the Jewish-owned newspapers which suddenly turned pessimistic and negative on the war effort. After the war, this undeniable Jewish subversion came to be referred to as “the stab in the back.”
Kazin: How would the war have ended if America had not intervened? The carnage might have continued for another year or two until citizens in the warring nations, who were already protesting the endless sacrifices required, forced their leaders to reach a settlement. If the Allies, led by France and Britain, had not won a total victory, there would have been no punitive peace treaty like that completed at Versailles, no stab-in-the-back allegations by resentful Germans, and thus no rise, much less triumph, of Hitler and the Nazis. The next world war, with its 50 million deaths, would probably not have occurred.Analysis: All true. But notice how Kazin references the “stab-in-the-back allegations” without defining the context of the term in regard to the bizarre German surrender of November 11, 1918. This clearly indicates that Kazin knows what happened but cannot (or will not) to tell us — not if he expects to keep his cushy tenured position at Georgetown. Post-World War I cartoons depict the fact that Germany was “stabbed in the back” by home-front Jews (Zionists and Communists) who wanted Germany and Turkey to lose the war. Kazin: The foes of militarism in the United States had tried to prevent such horrors. … They mounted street demonstrations, attracted prominent leaders from the labor and suffrage movements, and ran antiwar candidates for local and federal office.Analysis: Again, all true. But Kazin makes it sound as though only “liberals” (labor and women’s suffrage) opposed the war, ignoring the fact that many conservatives were also against Wilson’s warmongering.Kazin: They also gained the support of Henry Ford, who chartered a ship full of activists who crossed the Atlantic to plead with the heads of neutral nations to broker a peace settlement.Analysis: Indeed, before America even became involved, Ford was so opposed to the war that, in 1915, the Oscar II ocean liner was commissioned by him to become The Peace Ship. The peace mission was mostly mocked by the warmongering Fake News at the time (especially in Britain & France) as a ridiculous idea. The ship was dubbed, “To Good Ship Nutty.” After the war, Ford would blame “the International Jew” for both bringing about the war — and later dragging the United States in under false pretexts. Kazin: Once the United States did enter the fray, Wilson, with the aid of the courts, prosecuted opponents of the war who refused to fall in line. Under the Espionage and Sedition Acts, thousands were arrested for such “crimes” as giving speeches against the draft and calling the Army “a God damned legalized murder machine.”Analysis: Spot on.Kazin: The intervention led to big changes in America, as well as the world. It began the creation of a political order most citizens now take for granted, even as some protest against it: a state equipped to fight war after war abroad while keeping a close watch on allegedly subversive activities at home.Analysis: Spot on.Kazin: The larger aim of American foreign policy under both liberal and conservative presidents had remained much the same: to make the world “safe for democracy,” as our leaders define it. To achieve that purpose required another innovation of World War I: a military-industrial establishment funded, then partly and now completely, by income taxes.Analysis: Spot on.*****Though there is nothing overtly false in Kazin’s piece, and it does offer up quite a bit of useful data, we still have to grade it a “C-” for the simple reason that the unsuspecting reader will come away with the grossly mistaken impression that American entry into World War I was a historical “blunder” based upon misguided idealism. In reality, the event was a stroke of genius — evil genius to be precise — planned and executed by (((the usual suspects))) for the usual reasons, namely: the advancement of Globalism (post-war “League of Nations”) and its evil overlapping cousin — Zionism (post-war Jewish immigration to British-occupied Palestine).   1. British cartoon mocking Ford’s “Peace Ship” for trying to end the still-young war in 1915 //  2. Henry Ford eventually learned the truth about World War I — claiming that several honest Jews had informed him about the International Jewish hand involved in engineering the war. Ford then tried to warn the world about “The International Jew.” Not long after his death in 1947, the Globalists seized control of his foundation and have used it ever since to promote the very Globalism that Ford had tried to expose (before being pressured into shutting up).*Boobus Americanus 1: I read an opinion piece by a distinguished professor of History in the New York Times today. He questioned the wisdom of the United States entering World War I.
Boobus Americanus 2: What a senseless tragedy that war was.
           St. Sugar: Tragic, yess, Boobuss. But it wass not “ssenseless.” The New World Order crime gang achieved some very important objectivess. Editor: Globalism, Communism and Zionism — the big winners of BOTH World Wars.*COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

You may also like...

Translate »