|From the Anti-New York Times |
A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
JANUARY 2019 1 FED RESERVE NOTE
“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”
ALL ARTICLES FOR ANY GIVEN MONTH APPEAR ON SAME PAGE — MOST RECENT FIRST — SCROLL DOWN FOR PAST DATES.
|THURSDAY / JANUARY 3, 2019|
NY Times: Xi Jinping Warns Taiwan That Unification Is the Goal and Force Is an Option
Immediately upon glancing at this provocative headline — “Xi Jinping Warns Taiwan That Unification Is the Goal and Force Is an Option” — your skeptical disbelieving reporter here, without even having done further research yet, already knew, with 100% certainty, that the claim of Xi’s “warning” against Taiwan was a absolute lie. Apart from the fact that every political / geo-political story vomited out by the evil, stinking, no-good vermin at The Slimes is designed to confuse and/or deceive, this type of aggressive talk is simply not Xi’s style and would be extremely counterproductive to achieving China’s long wished-for objective of brotherly re-unification with the island state of Taiwan. There is simply no — frickin’ — way that Xi would have threatened 23 million of his Chinese brothers and sisters with military force, as this headline so boldly declares.While cyber-surfing the Internet in a tedious attempt to uncover what Xi actually said, many other similar headlines popped up from the rest of the Piranha Press — “left”-“center” & “right.” Some examples: The Globe & Mail (Canada): A More Confident China Threatens to Use Military Force in TaiwanThe Express (UK): China news: Xi issues Taiwan Threat in New WW3 WarningThe Daily Caller: China Warns Taiwan: Unification By Force Is On The Table
And yet, the Editorial Board of the ANYT, on a gut level, still knew that the allegations were false. Though all of the versions spoke of Xi’s threatened use of “force,” none of the articles contained anycontextual quotes from Xi. The Slimes, for example, printed only this quote:“We make no promise to abandon the use of force, and retain the option of taking all necessary measures.”Sounds ominous on its face, but where’s the bloody context? 1: At the 1943 Cairo Conference, FDR & Churchill promised Chiang that China would get key Manchurian ports after the war with Japan was ended. 2: But at the 1945 Yalta Conference in Crimea (USSR), the two slimeballs, behind Chiang’s back, agreed to give those ports to Stalin, from which he later supplied Communist rebel Mao! 3: In August of 1945, Mao (l) and Chiang (r) set their difference aside to toast to Japan’s defeat. Poor Chiang — who had foolishly waged war against Japan at FDR’s behest — had no idea what his “allies” had in store for China. *
1: The traitor George Marshall (2nd from left), as Special Envoy to China and later as Secretary of State, was among the handful of US Globalists who deliberately engineered the fall of Chiang’s China to Stalin’s agent, Mao Tse Tung (on right). 2. The “two Chinas” controversy remains a challenge because the U.S. has historically been committed to the “defense” of Taiwan (aka Formosa) — the island to which many of Chiang’s defeated forces and family fled to.
After much surfing and researching, we discovered from the website of NPR Radio (believe it or not), some contextual truth gems confirming that the Slimes and the rest of the Fake News were indeed lying by omission.Excerpts of Xi’s speech from the NPR article:“Compatriots on both sides of the strait are a family … With the one-China principle as a bedrock, there are no obstacles to any political party or group on Taiwan interacting with us. … We are willing to create a vast space for peaceful unification, but we will never leave any room for any sort of Taiwan independence separatist activities.”Though he didn’t name any country specifically, Xi warned Wednesday against foreign interference in China’s ‘Taiwan issue,’ saying “family matters should be resolved by family members.” (emphasis added) And this, from the English-language South China Morning Post (Hong Kong):“He (Xi) said China would not abandon the use of force for unification, but stressed that the military would only target external elements …. ‘Chinese people will not fight Chinese people,‘ he said.” 1: 2015: Chinese President Xi Jinping and then-Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou wave to journalists before their meeting in Singapore. The controversy remains a “hot spot” that Globalists can use to play against China. // 2: A Taiwanese “activist” kicks an image of Xi to protest the Taiwan – China talks. In other words, based on available bits and pieces of the actual speech found at NPR as well as some other foreign sources, what Xi really said boils down to the following: China and Taiwan were artificially separated due to historical accident
The mainland wants “One China,” but is willing to accept two political systemsReunification with autonomous Taiwan must be peacefulNo set timetable for reunification
No tolerance for CIA-backed separatists stirring up the usual bullshit in Taiwan
Any direct “outside interference” (USA) will be stopped, by “force” if necessary
This is the essence of China’s sensible position, and it is a program which many people on Taiwan actually support these days. But leave it to “the paper of record” and the rest of the Piranha Press, by twisting words and omitting critical context, to make Xi’s conciliatory speech sound as if the combined military forces of mainland China were about to storm the beaches of Taiwan! Such evil lying bastards these “journalists” be. Aren’t “youse guys” glad that you have the ANYT to clean up the fraudulent filth — which the Slimes proudly calls “truth” — for you?
“The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons.” – Ralph Waldo Emerson
* Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the leader of China just threatened Taiwan with invasion if they don’t reunify with the mainland.
Boobus Americanus 2: Xi is acting like Putin did in Crimea. St. Sugar: Boobus, you lazy-asss ssimpleton! He said no ssuch thing! Read the frickin’ fine print and find the misssing context. Editor: Most people don’t have time to do that. That’s what we’re here for.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS Email address:Comments: email@example.com
Pepe the “alt-right” frog reads the ANYT END OF YEAR RE-ENROLLMENT PERIOD
TIME TO SIGN-UP OR RENEW YOUR ANTI-NYT SUBSCRIPTION!
|WEDNESDAY / JANUARY 2, 2019|
The phony “little gal” in her “little sweater” in her “little kitchen” wants to be the “little president” for “the little guy.”
NY Times: Elizabeth Warren Announces She Is Running for President in 2020
|REBUTTAL BYLadies and gentlemen, and children of all ages — are you ready for QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show)2020?Our first Demonrat loon to throw her feathered headdress into the circus ring (nearly two years in advance of the big day of 2020!) is none other than the fake 1/1024th (allegedly) “American Indian,” the ever-angry harridan (a $10 word for a bossy old bitch) Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren. That’s very appropriate, given that 2020 will mark the 100th Anniversary of the national tragedy that was the “19th Amendment” to the U.S. Constitution (women’s “right” to vote).|
Outside her home in uber-wealthy Cambridge, Mass., flanked by her clearly P-whipped 2nd husband, Harvard professor Bruce H. Mann, and their Golden Retriever, Pocahontas vomited out the usual “woman of the people” Bolshevik barf about standing up to wealthy financial interests and championing the cause of the middle class — you know, “the little guy.”
The article quotes wily Warren:“The problem we’ve got right now in Washington is that it works great for those who’ve got money to buy influence, and I’m fighting against that. And you bet it’s going to make a lot of people unhappy. But at the end of the day, I don’t go to Washington to work for them.”Ya see that, boys and girls? Loony Lizzie is not afraid to fight for us “little guys” — and against “those who’ve got money.” (rolling eyes) Workers of the world, unite! 1. Staying true to her “for the little guy” facade, Loony Lizzy announces her candidacy in front of her home while wearing a “little guy” coat as her cuck-chump of a de-balled husband stands dutifully behind her holding the leash of their “little dog.” // 2 & 3. Always fighting and finger-waving on behalf of the “little guy” and against the super-rich — except, of course, against lefty billionaires like Rothschild, Soros, Steyer, Bloomberg, Zuckerberg, Spielberg, Pritzker, Geffen, Buffet, Gates, Rockefeller, Bezos, Musk et al).
This Massachusetts millionairess, as this article states, is most known — and respected for — her relentless attacks upon “big banks” and “unregulated capitalism.” Of course, in the tradition of pro-Rothschild / pro-central bank Karl Marx, Loony Lizzie’s foaming-at-the-mouth anti-bank demagoguery never quite seems to touch the biggest, most unregulated and most destructive central bank in world history, namely, Rothschild’s multi-trillion-dollar counterfeiting, loan-sharking and market-rigging crime syndicate known as “The Federal Reserve.” Nor do the destructive effects of “unregulated” government — with its stifling over-taxation and over-regulation of the productive private economy — ever seem to rile up this otherwise easy-to-rile-up psychopath. No sir. The big-mouthed nasty hag who coined the phrase: “You didn’t build that on your own!” (when condemning successful business owners for failing to adequately appreciate all that their government masters have done for them) remains silent as a mouse as big government and big central banking continue to dispossess and crush millions of “little guys.” Why is that, Lizzie? The shrill socialist shrew is also proudly “passionate” about “affordable education” for the children of us “little guys.” That’s very ironic, considering the fact that she collected a $300,000 per year salary for teaching a single class of wealthy kids at Harvard. Yes sir. When it comes to “capitalistic” money grubbing, the commie libtards of government, tech and academia are without peer. Indeed, the grasping avarice of self-righteous northeastern libtard swine like Pocahontas make Dicken’s Ebenezer Scrooge (pre-dream scenes)seem like Jesus Christ or the Buddha by comparison. Loony Lizzy follows in the mold of power-mad Bolshevik demagogues Leon Trotsky (Russia), Rosa Luxemberg (Germany) and Emma Goldman (United States)— always hootin’ and hollerin’ and finger-wagging about the “rights” of the “little guy” as a phony pretext for taking away the actual rights (and money) of every guy!
During the latter half of the 19th Century, there was a left-wing Russian revolutionary, a contemporary of Marx, named Mikhail Bakunin. Though Bakunin’s ideology would not be aligned with our generally pro-business / pro-private property position, the “Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times respects the man for at least being true to his ideals, and not a phony pious “little guy” poser in the employ of the super-rich Globalist elite. Bakunin’s take on Marx applies equally well to Loony Lizzy (though Warren is not a Jew). “Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists there must inevitably exist a state central bank, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation, which speculates upon the labor of the people, will always find the means for its existence. This Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work and live at the beat of the drum; the privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks.” Tell it, Mikey. Tell it.
1. Mikhail Bakunin was a true revolutionary socialist of the 19th Century who despised Marxism and central banking (and would surely also have despised the hypocrisy of crazy-ass Lizzie Warren). Bakunin regarded Marx’s phony “little guy” act as a tool of Rothschild totalitarianism. // 2. It has already been scientifically confirmed that Loony Liz “Pocahontas” Warren is a phony Indian. Convincing the gullible “little guys” of America that her concern for his/her interests is just as phony may not be as easy. * Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Elizabeth Warren just became the first Democrat to announce her candidacy for the 2020 presidential race.
Boobus Americanus 2: I like her. In spite of the embarrassing DNA results which proved she really isn’t Cherokee, she does fight for the little guy against big business and the rich. Editor: I don’t know about you, Boobus, but wealthy business owners enabled this “little guy” to buy a home, support a wife and two children, and to live comfortably. All that Loony Lizzy’s big government has ever done for me is pick my pockets 24/7 while letting the Fed debase the value of the portion I am allowed to keep. If you want to share a “stand-alone” free version of this piece, go here
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS Email address:Comments: firstname.lastname@example.org