“I Like to Leeve in Amedica…..Evedyting Frrreeee in Amedica” on Anchor Babies


“All The News That Sulzberger’s  Propaganda Rag  Saw Fit To Distort”

A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,

Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines




“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”



Image result for 14th amendment


NY Times: Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Proposal Is at Odds With Legal Consensus

It’s always amusing to watch slippery slimy scheming Marxists and their libtarded dupes suddenly turn on a dime and become strict constructionists of the United States Constitution, ain’t it? Whatever happened to all that “living document”  talk, eh?

In this particular piece of Sulzbergerian Slime, Fake News combines with Fake Scholarship to completely misrepresent the context and original intent of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution — the objective being to claim that Trump cannot unilaterally end the abominable practice of pregnant Turd World invaderettes pumping out their bastard “anchor babies” in a U.S. hospital, thus gaining for them full “rights” of citizenship and all the free stuff that comes with it.

Related imageImage result for illegals immigrant pregnant womenRelated image

“I like to leeev in A-mer-ic-a…. everyting free in A-mer-ic-a!”


The imbecilic article is infected, from headline to opening to finish, with the annoying logical fallacies of Argumentum ad Populum (arguing to consensus) and Argumentum ad  Verecundiam (arguing to authority). Take a whiff:
“The words of the 14th Amendment are plain, and the scholarly and judicial consensus about what they mean is nearly uniform: Children born in the United States automatically become citizens of the United States.”
One academic ass-clown after another after another is quoted in support of this erroneous position. And just like that, millions of Boobuses will shut their minds down and outsource their thinking to the “consensus” of “scholars.” Ugh! It’s so maddening. Particularly so because any lay person with 8th grade reading and research skills ought to be able to discover, on his own, that the 14th Amendment was never intended for the purpose of facilitating the invasion of the United States by illegal aliens.
For the sake of argument, let us put aside the fact that the post civil-war “Reconstruction Amendments” (13th, 14th & 15th) were imposed upon the defeated southern states under extreme duress. But even if we accept their legitimacy long after the fact — the 14th Amendment of 1868, which grants birthright citizenship, was clearly intended to apply to freed black slaves only — not to criminal border jumpers!
Here’s the language of the clause in question:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
You see, invaders are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. They are subject to the jurisdictions of the countries they came from. The only thing they and their broods are “entitled” to from us is a red, white and blue jack-boot up their asses and a one way ticket back to their country of origin — whose jurisdiction they remain under.
Image result for argumentum ad verecundiam Image result for panel of experts Image result for the thinker
 1. Argumentum ad Verecundiam: A single diploma-decorated dick-head says it is so.  // 2. Argumentum ad Populum: A whole panel of diploma-decorated dick-heads say it is so. // 3. Sound Socratic Logic: A single simple man seeks out original source data and objectively figures it out for himself. 
Should there remain any lingering doubt as to the original intent of the language, let us consult one of the actual authors of the 14th, Senator Jacob M. Howard of Michigan, for clarification. During the debate over the first clause of amendment, Howard argued for including the phrase “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” He stated:
“Every person born within the limits of the United State, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of person.” (here)
That quote can be found, and well-sourced to original documents, right at Wikipedia. So why the frickety-frack do we need “judicial scholars” to spoon feed us? Sadly, Trump’s threatened Executive Order would surely be challenged, and likely overturned, by the Ivy League geniuses in black robes that we are all supposed to worship.
 Who understands the 14th better?
Image result for paul ryan on 14th amendment Image result for 14th amendment Jacob M. Howard quote
Globalist Speaker Paul Ryan: “You cannot end birthright citizenship with an executive order. You know, as a conservative, I’m a believer in following the plain text of the Constitution, and I think in this case the 14th Amendment is pretty clear, and that would involve a very, very lengthy constitutional process.”
Amendment co-author Howard: “This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens..”



  Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the consensus among legal scholars is that Trump cannot undo the 14th Amendment with an Executive Order.

Boobus Americanus 2: Trump displays a shockingly authoritarian disegard for the rule of law.



Email address:

My Comment:  The killuminati/Globalist/Zionist/Freemason/Satanists/Communists/Socialists want these anchor babies here to leverage parents staying here with the support of the libtarded, brainwashed Democratic supporters for more Democratic votes.  None of these illegals ever votes for the good of the republic but ONLY for freebies for themselves.  They’re at the self-absorbed Maslow’s hierarchy of needs SURVIVAL phase-Physiological Needs.  (Food, Water, Sleep Needs.)

See the source image

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is a theory in psychology proposed by Abraham Maslow in his 1943 paper “A Theory of Human Motivation” in Psychological Review. Maslow subsequently extended the idea to include his observations of humans’ innate curiosity. His theories parallel many other theories of human developmental psychology, some of which focus on describing the stages of growth in humans.

You may also like...