Who is Behind the War on Whites? and Other Articles by the Anti-NY Times [Slimes]


By Mike King 


“All The News That Sulzberger’s  Propaganda Rag  Saw Fit To Distort”

A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,

Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines





“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”



Subscribe to the Daily Anti-New York Times and Stay on Top of World Events 

A rendering of a memorial to victims of lynching in Montgomery, Ala.

NY Times: Memorial in Alabama Will Honor Victims of Lynching



Under the ruinous reign of the sodomite couple of Mr. and Mr. Obongo, the Jewish-inspired War on Whites had reached levels of political assertiveness never before seen nor imagined. There were the insults of “White people” which were openly uttered by the deviant duo; the visits to the White House  by members of the New Black Panther Party and Black Lives Matter domestic terror groups; the erection of the 30-feet tall statue of Marxist Loser King in Washington DC; the incitement of violence against “racist” TM local police departments; the exalting of the Irreverend Al Charlatan to unofficial adviser-to-the-President status; the public abolition of the Confederate flag throughout much of the South; the announced 2020 replacement of the great Andrew Jacksonwith a head-shot of Aunt Jemima, er, Harriet Tubman for the $20 bill; and the popularization of the ridiculous new term, “White privilege” TM.



The Marxist War on Whites had never been out in the open like it is now.



Now comes word of the latest in-your-face insult to the good and gentle White people of Dixie — a monument to the rapists and murderers who were lynched during the days when men were men. We know, we know — they were all just innocent Black lads who “dindu nuffin” more than get caught innocently, momentarily and furtively glancing at some pretty White girl from a mile away (rolling eyes sarcastically).


Were there some isolated cases of vigilante justice gone awry — in which an innocent man may have been lynched? It’s quite possible. But let’s cut the commie crap and tell the whole truth about the lynch mobs which acted between the post-Civil War period and say, 1930. The 4,000 or so deserving recipients of the rope  about 20% of whom were White – got what was coming to them. As a matter of fact, there were also cases of righteous Black mobs lynching Black criminals! (here)


Of course, don’t expect the Marxist agitators or their Black front-men behind the Equal Justice Initiative to divulge these historical contexual truths. No, the weak-minded, teary-eyed suckers who will flock to this upcoming eye-sore will be told how 4,000 “dindu nuffins” were killed by big bad White “racists” TM with names like Bubba, Jethro and Billy Bob. That ought to do wonders for “race relations” TM in America!

“Our goal isn’t to be divisive,” says Bryan Stevenson, the director of the Equal Justice Initiative. “Our goal is just to get people to confront the truth of our past with some more courage.” —- “Not divisive,” eh Bryan? Yeah, sure.



Bryan Stevenson (above) intends to peddle a false version of Southern history — one that contradicts what was accurately portrayed in the classic silent film, Birth of a Nation. Many White women were indeed raped and even murdered. The culprits (be they Black or White) were then lynched by angry mobs of men with balls. 

Project Director Stevenson has more communist credentials that you can shake a hammer & sickle at. He is described as a “human rights” TM lawyer, a “social justice” TM activist, a professor at NYU, and a recipient of awards from the Globalist Carnegie and MacArthur foundations. In regard to his race-baiting monument to mendacity, we don’t have to read much further to discover who else is buttering Mr. Stevenson’s cornbread.

From the article:

“The museum and memorial project, for which Mr. Stevenson said he had raised about 40 percent of a projected $20 million, is the latest and most ambitious undertaking in a continuing effort by Mr. Stevenson to change public awareness of the nation’s racial history. Contributors to the project include the Ford Foundation and Google.”


$20 million dollar super structure to honor rapists and murderers? Wow! With cash from the Ford Foundationand Google, eh Stevenson? Goodness gracious. It doesn’t get any more New World Orderish than that. Ah, show us the shekels Lyin’ Bryan, show us the shekels.



Let’s all gang up on the dispossessed White Boys of America!


Ford Foundation’s Black President Darren Walker, Google’s Indian CEO Sundar Pichai, and Google’sJewish co-founder Sergei Brin are among the big backers behind the anti-White obscenity which will be built in Alabama.

From the article:

“The memorial will be contain a four-sided gallery of 801 suspended six-foot columns, representing a county where a lynching took place and etched with the name of the person or people lynched.”

Need we ask if any of the names of the raped and the murdered will be etched anywhere near the memorial? And speaking of raped and murdered — we can only guess at how many innocent White people will, over the course of time, be attacked by some of the excitable and inciteable “dindu nuffins” who will surely be dragged to this incendiary monument as part of school field trips. Pour enough hatred into a young man’s head and heart, and soon enough he will act upon it. That’s the plan, and Stevenson and his bosses bloody damn well know it — as do the seditious scribblers at Sulzberger’s Slimes.

Dear God — make this evil madness stop already, make it stop.


The sadistic rapist-murderer Leo Frank (cough cough) will no doubt be listed among the phony martyrs of the new monument. In 1913, Frank raped, battered and strangled 13-year old Mary Phagan (Image 1). When certain interests (cough cough) managed to intervene and spare him from the death penalty, the men of Atlanta stormed the prison and lynched low-life Leo from a tree in 1915. His death inspired the establishment of the Jewish ADL (Anti-Defamation League) — which has always maintained, quite ironically, that the real culprit was a Black man.



Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times today about a large monument that is going to be built in Alabama. It will memorialize all the innocent Black victims of lynching.

Boobus Americanus 2: I’d like to see that when it is completed. It’s important for the South to finally own up to its past.


Sugar: “Rape!!! Rape!!!

Editor: Sugar, stop being a clown and focus on your commentary, please.



EXCEPT FOR “THE BAD WAR” (Available only at TomatoBubble)


ANYT / 2018 / QUARTER 3


(Click on image)

“All The News That Sulzberger’s  Propaganda Rag  Saw Fit To Distort”

A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,

Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines




“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”





NY Times: ‘Horseface,’ ‘Lowlife,’ ‘Fat, Ugly’: How the President Demeans Women

Regular readers of The Anti-New York Times know that over the course of the past three years, our position on candidate / president Donald Trump has “evolved”  from generally anti-Trump to generally pro-Trump. But that doesn’t mean that we will obediently close our eyes and refrain from taking him to the woodshed when the situation calls for it.


Though his controversial tweets serve the important dual purposes of reaching the public directly, and gaining unlimited free publicity (both positive and negative) in the process, his juvenile habit of mocking the appearance of women prevents him from winning over many “college educated”  women, particularly average-looking and unattractive ones, who aren’t crazed leftists.


Yes, we understand that the role of “Stormy” Daniels (who we believe is actually working for Trump as part of the grand sting operation known as “The Storm”) is one of a money-hungry whore “porn-star” deserving of disrespect and mockery. But what does it profit you, Mr. President, to refer to her as “Horseface?” Call her a liar, a con artist or even a piece of trash. Few would argue with the accuracy of such epithets. But when you mock the face of what is actually a good-looking woman, “moderate” female voters cringe in dismay. In the minds of any woman who is less than an “8,” if Stormy is ugly, then what are they?


Stupid, stupid, stupid — Mr. President!


Image result for stormy danielsImage result for trump tweet horsefaceRelated image

Referring to an attractive woman (albeit a whore) as “Horseface” needlessly shocks and alienates “centrist” and average-looking females who could otherwise be won over on other issues.



The article quotes Debbie Walsh, a libtard professorette from your reporter’s Marxist alma mater, Rutgers University:


“You cannot continue to be a party in power if the voters that you are appealing to are white men over the age of 60.”

Proving that even broken clocks are right (at least partially) twice-a-day, we have to agree with Professorette Walsh on this one. Trump’s supporters, both male and female, are already solidly “in the bag” and will not leave him or the Republicans. The positive shock-value that such juvenile tweets gained for Trump in the past has already been maxed out. The smart approach now would be to maintain the aggressive posture when attacking political enemies; while ditching the personal quips about ugly faces and fat bodies. Calling out the demented Communist lunatic Lizzie Warren as “Pocahontas” is fine and very effective. However, calling women, even prostitutes, “Horseface” is totally counter-productive.
Is there no one close to Trump who can explain this to him? Would he even listen to them if they did?
Image result for Debbie Walsh rutgers Image result for ivanka and trump Image result for red wave trump
1. Rutgers Red Debbie Walsh is right about one thing. Trump’s attacks on women’s faces hurt other Republicant’s running for office. // 2. This is the one issue in which libtard Ivanka really needs to have a talk with daddy about. // 3. If the “Red Wave” (Republican) does happen next month, it will be in spite of Trump’s careless tweeting about women’s looks, not because of it.
We deeply regret the fact that the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ever granted our beloved, emotionally-driven women the “right” to vote back in 1920. Nonetheless, the delicate sensibilities of the fairer sex are a marketing reality which a cunning politician, compelled to function in a “democracy” , must wisely contend with. If the Q-Anon scenario of a purging of the Deep State is to have any chance at all of playing out as advertised, Trump is going to have to expand his legions to include the middle-of-the-roaders and easily shocked females. Childish wisecracks about women’s faces will not help in that regard.
Mr. President. Leave the juvenile name-calling and face/body shaming to folks like Sugar and me. We don’t need to win votes.
Image result for 19th amendment Image result for 19th amendment Image result for women voters
The tragedy of women’s suffrage (voting rights) is a 100-year-old reality that politicians have to skillfully deal with. Childish face & body shaming is no way to win these gals over to our side. 



  Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Trump referred to Stormy Daniels as “Horseface.”

Boobus Americanus 2: Doesn’t he realize that many women won’t vote for Republicans because of such statements?


Email address:



You may also like...

Translate »