9/11: Holes in the Media Story

by ·

Picture
Picture

“Trusting the Science” of 9/11

By Mike King
In the immediate aftermath of the terror attack of 9/11/2001 — a “dream team” of engineers was summoned to the scene of the astonishing collapse of the Twin Towers in Manhattan. Little did the distinguished professionals know at the time that they were invited only for the purpose of window dressing — to provide the illusion of a forensic investigation into the cause of the collapsed, pulverized and aerosolized man-made mountains of steel and concrete.

One investigator complained to the New York Times:

“‘This is almost the dream team of engineers in the country working on this, and our hands are tied,’ said one team member who asked not to be identified. ‘Members have been threatened with dismissal for speaking to the press. FEMA is controlling everything,’ the team member said. ‘Just give us the money and let us do it, and get the politics out of it.”’

The article continued:

In calling for a new investigation, some structural engineers have said that one serious mistake has already been made in the chaotic aftermath of the collapses: the decision to rapidly recycle the steel columns, beams and trusses that held up the buildings.
(Here)

The fix was in, and the “explanation” for the collapse had already been cooked-up by the Deep State illusion makers. The boys from Langley even designed a “computer model” for us –– a children’s cartoon video, in essence — demonstrating how “jet fuel fires” from the penetrating passenger jets caused the steel of the uppermost floors to “buckle” and trigger a “pancake” collapse all the way down to the street, a quarter mile below. A handful of science whores then “peer reviewed” the fairy tale for Normiedom and the rest is Fake History.

Picture
Picture
Picture
1. The hollow aluminum planes penetrated steel exoskeletons as if they were flying through sheet-rock — or even cardboard! // 2. The oxygen-starved fires melted steel? // 3. Voila! Instant powder and dust.
Picture
Picture
Not every “expert” was buying into the Deep State’s free-fall speed “pancake collapse” theory.
The amusing thing about “experts” — and this observation also includes the honest ones — is that they always go right away for the technical data while completely neglecting to utilize their intuitive intelligence. Personally, I’ve always believed that this mental deficiency is the product of an educational system which — even at its highest levels — is designed to produce specialized idiots who can calculate the heck out of something, yet not see what is right under their noses. Lots of math and science training — not enough study of literature, philosophy, logic, art etc. and — and clearly not enough life “street smarts” or country “horse sense.”

With all due deference to and respect for the brilliant engineers and architects who have calculated the physical impossibility of “the official story,” let us keep our analysis here at a simple level understandable to even the most scientifically-challenged among us — and therefore far more effective at opening eyes  to the hidden truth of this monstrous 21-year old LIE.

Picture
Picture
Picture
Though we appreciate and applaud the intrepid efforts and “prestigious” proclamations of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, their calculations are redundant. Any thinking man (or child!) should be able to see this without using math or science.
THREE SIMPLE QUESTIONS THAT ANYONE CAN UNDERSTAND AND DEMAND ANSWERS TO

*1. How can a hollow aluminum tube and its thin wings so easily penetrate a solid steel exoskeleton made up of beams as thick as oak trees?

Donald Trump himself — who knows a thing or two about building skyscrapers — stated on 9-12-2001:

“This was an unbelievably powerful building(s). When I first looked at it, I couldn’t believe it because there was a hole in the steel!. … How could a plane, even a 767, possibly go through the steel? …. I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously.… I just can’t imagine anything going through that wall.”   

Of course they “had bombs” — and now appear to have used TV computer graphics to simulate a plane flying through the steel as if it was a paper bag — when it should have crumpled up like an empty beer can. Think about it rationally.

Picture
Picture
1. Trump sensed right away that we were being lied too. // 2. The entire hollow aluminum plane, including the flimsy thin wings, penetrated the steel outside walls as if it were flying through paper. If a solid lead bullet cannot penetrate a bullet-proof vest – then how did a much slower hollow aluminum tube penetrate a wall of thick steel?
Picture
Picture
Picture
1. A solid cannonball (about 500 mph) couldn’t even fully penetrate a small point on a simple brick wall, but hollow aluminum tubes at 300 mph so easily passed through walls of thick commercial grade steel? //  2. A plane strikes a flock of birds and sustains so much damage — yet the steel walls of the twin towers were so easily and completely penetrated? // 3. The flimsy wings of an airplane are nearly severed by a hollow pole, yet cleanly penetrated a steel wall on 9/11?
* 2. How can the top 10% and 20% of the respective towers completely grind down — at free fall speed — the remaining 90% and 80% of the buildings?

The top floors of the towers may have been very heavy — but the more numerous lower floors were much heavier. The top 10/20% crushing the bottom 80/90% would be analogous to dropping a single cinder block on top of a cemented and anchored stack of nine other blocks — and expecting a mass of instant powder and dust. Try that experiment in your backyard and let us know if you can duplicate the “pancake” collapse of 9/11. Come to think of it, why didn’t FEMA “investigators” recreate a small scale tower — like say, 50-feet tall — and fly an equally proportional fuel-laden drone into it — just to see what would happen? Hmmm?

Adding insanity to idiocy, imagine if were to drop a large stone off of the top of the World Trade Center — at the precise moment which the “pancake collapse” initiated. Then try to imagine the stone (encountering only air resistance) and the top of the collapsing building (encountering the resistance of the entire steel reinforced building) reaching the street at about the same time. Nuts!

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
1. A few top cans of tuna won’t grind down the stack below — even if you were to stand on top of them and jump up and down! //  2. Nor will a stack of blocks if you drop blocks on top of them. // 3. Ready .. Set .. Go! — A race between the collapsing upper floors of the Twin Towers and a jumper would be a close one. How can that be?
* 3. How did a 3rd skyscraper — the 610 feet-tall World Trade Center #7 — which was not even struck by an airplane — also collapsed into its own footprint at free-fall speed?

Unlike the previously mentioned physical impossibilities, we may excuse normies for not thinking this one through. You see, the vast majority of people in America (and the world) STILL DON’T EVEN KNOW that a 3rd massive skyscraper — located 300 feet away from the towers and not even struck by any alleged planes — collapsed into its own footprint at free fall speed that day. With the exception of a single CBS News clip which Anchorman Dan Rather must have slipped up in allowing to be aired, the event was never seen again — except on the Internet.

This one is the kicker, and only a madman (of which plenty walk among us) or a supine coward of the lowest rank (plenty of them too) would even attempt to explain this away with “science.” The Deep State (CIA-Mossad) did 9/11, and their affiliated Fake News, politicians and academics covered it up. “The science is settled!” — as they say. Deal with it!

Picture
Picture
The collapse of WTC Building 7 was a clean controlled demolition. It is the weakest of all the weak links of the 9/11 fairy tale.

Tags:

You may also like...