The Truth About NATO (Created by British Empire to Keep Russia Out, the U.S. In and Germany Down)
™
An “Almost Daily” Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Headlines
“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”
MARCH 23, 2023
NY Times: NATO Members Not Meeting Their Military Spending Targets
NATO coming up short on its spending targets — in spite of a “war” going in Eastern Ukraine — is just another indicator that the New World Order is dying a slow death. From the article:
“Only seven of the 30 member nations of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are meeting the alliance’s target of spending 2 percent of their gross domestic product on the military, NATO said on Tuesday.”
Now would be a good “teachable moment” ™ to review how NATO was formed and what its true functions were. Among the religious devotees and dupes of NWO Globalism, NATO ranks right up there with the UN, the WHO, the EU, the World Bank and the IMF as “indispensable” institutions of “global stability.” The truth is, that from its inception in 1949 to the present day, NATO — a wholly-owned subsidiary of the CIA which itself was founded just two years before NATO — has always been a destabilizing war-making organization in service to the Globalists.
The origin of NATO traces back to the Treaty of Brussels of 1948 among Belgium, France, the Netherlands and the UK — four European states which had conspired to start World War II in the first place (and, in the case of UK, France & Belgium, World War I as well). NATO is essentially the greatly expanded 20th Century version of the Rothschild-British-French bully alliance which, in addition to World War I (1914-1918), imposed the Crimean War upon Russia (1853-1856); the Opium Wars upon China (1840s & 1850s); and even plotted to enter the U.S. Civil War (1861-1864) on the side of the Confederacy — until the Russians threatened them not to.
Economically ravaged and militarily weakened by World War II, the four dying colonial powers agreed upon a mutual defense system which would soon include all of Western Europe plus the USA. The Alliance’s first Secretary General, Lord Ismay, explained that the aims behind the new military bloc were to:
“… keep the Russians (Soviets) out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.”
NATO, after having achieved all three of the objectives set forth by Ismay, and after outliving the Soviet Union and its Eastern European vassal governments, has since expanded eastward into a 30-member force — adapting the “keep the Russians out” element into one of “menace the Russians.”
In more current times, Admiral Vladimir Komoyedov, defense committee chairman of the Russian Duma (lower house of Parliament), puts it this way: “They would even admit the North Pole to NATO for the purpose of encircling Russia.”
Tell it, Admiral. Tell it!
With this bit of historical context in mind, we can better understand the Globalist butt-hurt of the past few years — “the Trump years.” — of NATO decline. NATO is, and has always been, a violent, dangerous and cruel war machine. Indeed, the bloody beast selected to be very first “Supreme Allied Commander” of NATO was that vile mass-murderer of 1.5 million German POW’s, General Dwight D. Eisenhower — a position (which he held concurrently with his unmerited, resume-enhancing no-show job as president of “prestigious” Columbia University) from which the Globalists were to soon launch his “Republican” candidacy for president.The more recent suicidal game of “chicken” with Russia — which had been deactivated by Trump — was intended to kick off World War III. To that end, the Alliance had stationed many thousands of troops while staging large scale war-games in Eastern Europe — all part of an effort to bait Putin into drawing “first blood.”
Exactly as Lord Ismay had said, Germany and the US (its people, that is) are also adversely impacted by NATO. For Americans, the expensive NATO quagmire keeps us entangled with and enslaved to Globalist schemes. The game spelled out in “debunked” Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion about 120 years ago remained in play, until recently:
PROTOCOL VII // Article 3: “We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.”
|
|
|
“A joint military program has already been made… It thus becomes an offensive and defensive military alliance against Russia. I believe our foreign policy should be aimed primarily at security and peace, and I believe such an alliance is more likely to produce war than peace. A third world war would be the greatest tragedy the world has ever suffered. Even if we won the war, we this time would probably suffer tremendous destruction, our economic system would be crippled, and we would lose our liberties and free system just as the Second World War destroyed the free systems of Europe. It might easily destroy civilization on this earth…”
Tell it Senator. Tell it! — By the way, Taft was expected to be elected president in 1952 — until the “instant Republican” Eisenhower came along and cheated him out of the party’s nomination. The following year, Taft (an ally of Senator Joseph McCarthy) died of rapid-onset cancer.Nothing has changed since Taft’s times. If anything, the arguments in favor of keeping NATO in existence are now even more absurd. Not a single one of the NATO member nations and mini-nations faces any external threats from Russia — nor do any of the states still being considered for expanded membership, like Ukraine and Georgia. So let us all hope that the Trump-Putin understanding that got the One Worlders so agitated marked the beginning of the end for this purely offensive military organization.
|
|
|
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that NATO is falling short of its military spending targets.
Boobus Americanus 2: NATO seems powerless now in the face of Russian aggression.
*
St Sugar: Without the US, NATO is nothing, Boobuss.
Editor: Putin, Trump and Xi now protect the world from the Rothschild crime syndicate.
Chip-in to help the site grow.
Boobus Americanus 2: NATO seems powerless now in the face of Russian aggression.
*
St Sugar: Without the US, NATO is nothing, Boobuss.
Editor: Putin, Trump and Xi now protect the world from the Rothschild crime syndicate.
Thierry Etienne Joseph Rotty
·
Senior Controller at NATO2y
Was NATO created to keep the United States in, Russia out, and Germany down?
Back in 1949, that was indeed a very accurate description.
There was no doubt the Soviets could form a threat to the future of Western Europe, at least in the long run.
NATO was the fourth treaty in a row dealing with Western Defence. The first was the Dunkirk Treaty of 1947 between Britain and France with the specific aim of keeping Germany down.
This was expanded in 1948 to include the BENELUX with the purpose of forming a common defence against German/Soviet aggression. This was known as the Western Union (WU).
The third treaty was a short-lived treaty called the Atlantic Alliance (March 1949) between the WU and Canada. Canada wanted in as the WU had proven to be a success beyond all hope when it came to military cooperation and training.
The final result was NATO with the Atlantic Alliance taking the US and more European countries on board.
At this point, the Europeans were more worried about the Germans than the Soviets.
Getting the Americans to stay in their Zone of Occupation in Europe was an integral part of the NATO deal.
