In early May 2020, my to-date analysis on COVID-19 painted a foreboding, ominous and nefarious picture that quite literally, no one else had pieced together and posited on paper like I had. That exclusive analysis held that the U.S. was embroiled in an asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared war with China that aligned entirely with China’s stated, preferred and doctrinal warfare vector of biowarfare.

I know the analysis was exclusive because for months I vetted my own research. I couldn’t find rivaling work anywhere.

The May 2020 analysis made President Donald J. Trump a wartime president and it made the Obama Administration a treasonous one. By extension of it and forward to the present, it also makes the Biden Administration equally guilty and all of it rests on a political continuum that I’ve branded Dynastic Bush, which is borne out of the ascendance of George H.W. Bush through the U.S. federal apparatus beginning in 1963.

Intensive examination of Chinese doctrine overlaying an abundance of evidence including circumstantial and anecdotal components permitted this exclusive and laser-accurate analysis. The corpus of that work now encompasses nearly 400 articles.

Since early January 2020, I’ve relentlessly stated and evidenced that COVID-19 is a construct of enterprise fraud. No one else did that.

Since early May 2020, I’ve adamantly stated that China and the CCP had unleashed a biowarfare attack on the U.S. No one else did that.

Think back to those times. In early January 2020, COVID-19 hadn’t even made its way stateside and people were still recovering from Christmas and New Years as the U.S. stood-down on the virus permitting unmitigated international including from China. My analysis stood alone – it’s all enterprise fraud.

In early May 2020, people were still trying to understand a now stateside virus mistakenly thought to be only few months old as they were inundated with reporting on mitigations, lock-downs, mortality, “new cases,” masking and the prospects of potential relief from a new platform of vaccines as the only avenue for a “return to normal.” My analysis stood alone – it’s all enterprise fraud and we are at war.

I was so certain of the analysis that I began outreach efforts to every single media outlet I thought would give attention to the it and the supporting evidence. I was ignored by every single media figure or outfit I contacted and I fought rampant and complete censorship right up to outright banning from all of the social media platforms like Twitter, Youtube, etc. I share this for a very particular reason that I will address momentarily.

Yesterday, I wrote this article detailing the emergence of a Department of Energy [DOE] report confirming the “lab leak” position on SARS-CoV-2 as deriving from the Wuhan Institute of Virology [WIV]: Enterprise Fraud and Treason in Lockstep as the Carve-out for #FalseFlagFauci Continues: Department of Energy Driving Lab Leak Narrative. The article provides an in-depth explanation of how, “Succinctly, this DOE report is sowing further fraudulent narrative as a cover story and exit strategy.“

In the article, I go on to explain how the exit strategy for an imploding COVID-19 narrative must envelop Anthony Fauci and thus provide his exit as well.

I described the general nature of the DOE report and emerging narrative: “The levels of weapons grade propaganda and enterprise fraud are as vicious as they are effective in accomplishing two things: hoodwinking the populace and paving the exit path once the damage is done. The complexity of it is found in a layered approach contained within a shifting narrative that occurs incrementally.”

I then went on to define incrementalism including this example of it: “How “flatten the curve for two weeks” was incrementally transitioned into a full-blown societal lock-down that shuttered businesses and schools and coerced and forced human genetic experimentation in the form of mRNA injections [bioweapons]. Never forget that.”

I also explained the strategy of the exit as a limited hangout where “aspects of the truth are proffered alongside a few damaging facts; the blame for which is accepted by the issuing party.”

The most important aspect of the DOE report and my analysis of it is this: “The limited hangout exit strategy is another example of incrementalism. Therein the population was fed a specific sequence of COVID-19 narrative explanations: 1st-an organic viral outbreak occurring by means of the virus jumping from bats to humans and spreading via a wet food market in China, 2nd-the proposition of a “lab leak” theory with continued denials and further adherence to the organic outbreak and 3rd-the confirmation of the “lab leak” position. The new DOE report accounts for the third component in the sequence.“

It’s basic psychology and the analog for it is the significant other who lets you down over time to the eventual and inevitable break-up: 1st-mentioning how you’ve grown apart, 2nd-“we need to talk” and, eventually, 3rd-“this isn’t going to work-out.”

In particular, the limited hangout aspect of the analogous exit and the requisite component of assuming partial blame is explained in Seinfeldian terms courtesy of George Costanza, “It’s not you, it’s me.”

That’s what the DOE report is doing. The short article includes a substantial review of important and pertinent factual evidence of the complicity of the U.S. and Anthony Fauci relative to U.S. funding of the WIV and a critical figure identified as James LeDuc, so I recommend giving it a read as the required contextual backdrop for what follows.

Yesterday’s article concluded with: “They now say “lab leak” but for the cohort of discerning and capable independent thinkers, we know differently and we say deliberate biowarfare strike. Not without a sense of irony, that’s also what the evidence says.”

It goes without saying that the conclusion strictly adheres to the corpus of analysis and evidence; especially the China/CCP/biowarfare position assumed and evidenced on 06 May 20.

No sooner did I write the article than we received direct testimony from a CCP internal whistleblower and virologist in Dr. Li Meng Yan, who had direct knowledge of matters pertaining to the WIV and SARS-CoV-2. Here we tap the breaks for you to consider the censorship and suppression of my analysis and work as described above.

Dr. Yan’s testimony arrives courtesy of Tucker Carlson and here’s what I want you to consider relative to Carlson’s reporting, which I’ve previously drawn into question despite being very fond of Carlson and appreciative of his work.

When I wrote the 06 May 20 article evidencing China’s asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared war against the U.S. that occurred by means of its primary doctrinal warfare vector of biowarfare; and which made President Trump a wartime president, I SENT THE WORK TO FOX AND TUCKER CARLSON. The network acknowledged receipt of it and moved it along to Carlson’s staff indicating that I would directly hear back from them. That never happened and no further contact was received.

Then on 08 Dec 21, Carlson hosted Glenn Beck in a segment where Beck essentially unrolled the same fact set that I sent to Carlson well over a year earlier. It gave me every right to question Fox News, which gave Arizona to Biden on election night 2020 to begin the slide to a stolen election, and Carlson, who appears to selectively report the “news” on a thoroughly delinquent timeline of his own choosing.

I’m not done. For anyone who thinks I’m rushing to judgement on Fox and Carlson, consider that my network of contacts and colleagues provides distinct advantages, such as being able to contact people directly.

On 02 Mar 22, I leveraged a resource I had placed on reserve for a long time: Carlson’s personal cell phone number. I contacted Carlson directly via text message providing a long, thoughtful and appropriate introduction considering that he likely had no idea who I was and he certainly didn’t anticipate receiving the contact and the linked article, which was a recapitulation of what I sent to the show in May 2020.

I never heard back. Carlson didn’t even bother to reply back asking who I was or how I had obtained his contact information. What does that tell you? Despite being a Carlson fan, it tells me a lot.

So, when I see things like the following confirmation of my longstanding analysis coming from Carlson, I can’t help but to think that if he had given fidelity and credence to the analysis I sent him just a few months after the beginning of the “pandemic,” perhaps 2020 wouldn’t have been stolen, Trump would still be president and we’d have avoided preventable and unprecedented widespread damage, destruction, death and crimes against humanity.

Perhaps if Carlson had led-out on the evidenced analysis rather than ignore it, the whistleblowers and others with the capacity to affect change would have come out of the woodwork to create a groundswell of momentum towards the truth and reconciliation of the most egregious crimes and warfare of our generation.

I discuss the contacts with Carlson in two articles: ONE TWO.

Nonetheless, here we are in late February 2023 with direct confirmation of exactly and precisely what I sent Carlson in early May 2020; almost three years earlier.

In the following segment on Carlson’s show, which I sourced from Red Voice Media, CCP internal whistleblower and virologist Dr. Li Meng Yan stated that, “Of course, it [the “leak” of SARS-CoV-2] was not an accident.”

Referencing biosecurity levels 3 and 4 and noting that the WIV is a level 4 facility, Dr. Yan stated [emphasis added],

However, I’m the scientist working in such lab using coronavirus and I can tell you based on the protocol and also the other surveillance system, it would be impossible for the lab leak [to] accidentally happen in such lab and cause the Wuhan outbreak and also the pandemic. So definitely, now we just reach to the first step: it was from China’s lab and we need to pursue the truth of origin and we need to keep going on.

Based on the evidence and the source I have…that the virus was intentionally brought out of this strict [biosecurity level 4] lab and released in the community; however, I don’t think the outbreak in Wuhan was intentional.

CCP internal whistleblower and virologist Dr. Li Meng Yan

Dr. Yan cited the CCP’s underestimation of the virus’ transmissibility as the primary reason for the spread in Wuhan and the local outbreak.

Dr. Yan stated that the,

In light of Tucker Carlson’s twice rejection of the exact same analysis I sent him in early May of 2020 and then again in early March of 2022; and not without a sense of irony, Carlson concluded the interview by stating,

“We just have to hope and pray that you will be interviewed by many other journalists in this country over the coming weeks now that this has been confirmed…I really hope you’re no longer ignored.”

Tucker Carlson

I know how you feel being ignored, Dr. Yan. Unfortunately, for Tucker Carlson, it was he who did the ignoring and it was almost three years ago at a time when much of the destruction and tragedy of the enterprise construct of COVID-19, which manifested as a Chinese biowarfare attack, could have been stemmed and prevented to a very large degree.

Here is Dr. Yan’s brief segment:

In the event that segment disappears, I’ve uploaded it my account at Bit Chute here.

Before closing, other new COVID-19 developments bear mentioning:

Respective to my analysis projecting H5N1 “bird flu” as a plausible “plug-and-play” replacement for SARS-CoV-2 in the “pandemic” construct, a new study has emerged confirming that the “highly pathogenic avian influenza A/H5N1 virus can cause morbidity and mortality in humans but thus far has not acquired the ability to be transmitted by aerosol or respiratory droplet (“airborne transmission”) between humans.” That said, the study confirms airborne transmission between ferrets.

I most recently discussed H5N1 in these articles: 1-THESE PEOPLE PLAY INSIDE OF A BOX: Bullseye! 8-months Old Analytical Projection Manifesting, WHO Issues Warning on Bird Flu Pandemic and 2-WAR, FAMINE and DISEASE: Appeal Filed in Our Ninth Circuit Federal Grand Jury COVID-19 Case, Trajectory Toward World War III, COVID-19 Developments and New Marburg “Pandemic” Threat.

Respective to mRNA injections and the damage and death they deliver, yet another study has emerged conferring and validating that natural immunity is superior to vaccination. Reporting indicates that post-infection immunity is superior to protection from COVID-19 “vaccines.”

Reporting indicates that Congress is now preparing to investigate the COVID-19 mRNA injections fraudulently sold to the public as “vaccines,” when they did not meet the standard, medical, legal or patent definition for a vaccine until the definition was changed. I would anticipate that any such investigation within the status quo of the combined Congress and federal apparatus would amount to another limited hangout exit strategy. Congress can only issue criminal referrals to the Department of Justice and from there, the corruption of AG Merrick Garland, a Biden appointee, and the greasy DOJ must be overcome. That currently presents as an implausible endeavor.

Closing with positive news, common sense conservative lawmakers in the great state of Idaho are pursuing legislation to criminalize the administration of mRNA injections. Given an abundance of evidence indicating that the mRNA injections borne out of a biowarfare and enterprise fraud they should be regarded as bioweapons. This should cause other states to follow in-kind; especially since no such action is anticipated to come from the Biden Administration or a corrupt and criminal U.S. politburo.

I wish Fox News and Tucker Carlson would have given fidelity and credence to what I sent them in early May 2020. I wish anyone would have. No one would listen and perhaps it was because my analysis was too much of the unvarnished truth to be considered plausible if not altogether truthful.

Now we know for certain that what I sent almost three years ago – the position that the U.S. was amidst an asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared war aligning with China’s preferred and stated doctrinal warfare vector of biowarfare – was entirely on the mark.

I wish Carlson would have listened when I approached him again in early March 2022. He didn’t, though, and here we are. Perhaps if we’re lucky, people will listen to Dr. Yan now even if it’s almost three years late.

-End-