I’ve spent 40 years fighting to stop the oil and coal titans from contaminating our water, our air and our children with toxins, arsenic, benzene, PAHs, the mercury that has poisoned every freshwater fish in America — AND the carbon which now poses an existential threat to our planet.
I have litigated these issues for almost four decades. I know the science backward and forward. It is ironic to me that activists awake to Pharma’s corruption and greed still remain blind when it comes to Carbon’s. Predatory industries employ the same playbook. Pharma convinces the public that the autism epidemic is an illusion. Big Tobacco swears smoking doesn’t cause cancer. Monsanto convinces us that glyphosate is harmless. Similarly, Big Oil and King Coal go to great lengths to persuade us that carbon doesn’t heat the planet.
They all capture regulators, tame reporters and corrupt lawmakers to subvert democracy. They use the same phony tobacco scientists and mercenary biostitutes to gin up fraudulent studies that sow doubt and give political cover to their corrupt politicians.
In the 1970s, Exxon employed the world’s most brilliant carbon scientists to understand oil production. The company prided itself on knowing more about the fate of the carbon molecule than anyone on Earth. Internal documents show that those scientists warned Exxon that business as usual would melt the Poles, cause sea levels to rise and trigger cataclysmic climate change.
Rather than changing its business model, Exxon and its Carbon Cronies invested half a billion dollars in a four-decade campaign of lies and deception to gull the public. Their campaign was abetted by their deep-state allies, the intelligence apparatus, the military-industrial complex, and the MSM, which took cues from its oil and automobile advertisers. This cartel engineered a suicide pact for humanity and the planet. They are the apocalyptical forces of ignorance and greed.
Please try to escape the seduction of their lies and propaganda and help us fight these villains.
NAWAPA Pushed By Larouche Would Have Prevented This Problem of Drought As It Was Designed to Ensure There Would Be Enough Water No Matter How Many Droughts Occurred….NAWAPA is the 2nd Story Here.
•
Colorado River on Brink of ‘Catastrophic Collapse’ Brought on by Historic Drought
“Today’s Colorado River projections are … a dire warning for the American West to eliminate rampant corporate water abuse before it’s too late,” said Amanda Starbuck, Food & Water Watch research director, following news the U.S. Department of the Interior ordered Arizona, Nevada and Mexico to draw less water from the river, on which 40 million people rely.
Link copied
NASA’s satellite images show water levels in Lake Mead over the last 22 years. Credit: NASA Earth Observatory.
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.
Amid extreme drought driven by the climate emergency and warnings of a possible “catastrophic collapse” of the dwindling Colorado River, the U.S. Department of the Interior on Tuesday announced the first-ever tier 2 shortage for the overdrawn vital waterway, triggering water use cuts in two Southwestern states and Mexico for 2023.
Based on projected water levels for 2023, the tier 2 shortage will force drought-ravaged Arizona, Nevada and Mexico to draw less from the Colorado River, upon which 40 million people in seven states and Mexico rely.
Arizona will face the biggest cut — 592,000 acre-feet, or about one-fifth of the state’s annual allocation, while an 8% reduction in Nevada is expected to have little impact in a state that recycles most of its indoor-use water and does not use its full allotment. Mexico’s allotment will be cut by approximately 7%.
The move came after Colorado River Basin states failed to meet a federal deadline at the end of Monday to come up with a plan to achieve a 15% reduction in water use, an amount scientists say is needed to prevent water stored in dangerously depleted reservoirs from dropping even further.
“Every sector in every state has a responsibility to ensure that water is used with maximum efficiency. In order to avoid a catastrophic collapse of the Colorado River System and a future of uncertainty and conflict, water use in the basin must be reduced,” Assistant U.S. Secretary for Water and Science Tanya Trujillo said in a statement.
“The Interior Department is employing prompt and responsive actions and investments to ensure the entire Colorado River Basin can function and support all who rely on it,” she added.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Camille Touton said in June that in order to stabilize the Colorado River Basin, states and water districts must devise a plan by mid-August to cut 2 to 4 million acre-feet of water usage by next year.
One acre-foot equals the quantity of water needed to flood one acre a foot deep — approximately 326,000 gallons. Touton warned that the federal government would intervene if states could not come up with a plan on their own.
“Instead of singing ‘Kumbaya,’ it appears they’re sharpening their knives,” Kyle Roerink, executive director of the Great Basin Water Network, said of the riparian states in an interview with Marketplace.
In a separate statement, Roerink alleged that “certain Upper Basin interests are holding the Bureau of Reclamation hostage at this point. They have called the Bureau’s bluff time and again. Nothing has changed with today’s news — except for the fact that the Colorado River system keeps crashing.”
Addressing those interests within a California context, Food & Water Watch research director Amanda Starbuck decried the “massive water use of Big Ag and Big Oil.”
“By switching to renewable energy sources like solar and wind, California could save 98% of the water currently needed for its fossil fuel production,” she continued.
“And by transitioning away from industrial mega-dairies, thirsty crops like almonds and pistachios, and engaging in regenerative farming, California will gain enormous water savings that could serve small farmers and domestic households.”
“Today’s Colorado River projections are undoubtedly a dire warning for the American West to eliminate rampant corporate water abuse before it’s too late,” Starbuck added.
Historically, the Colorado River ran 1,450 miles from its headwaters high in the Rocky Mountains of northern Colorado into Utah, through the Grand Canyon in Arizona and along Nevada and California’s southeastern borders before flowing into the northernmost tip of the Gulf of California in Mexico.
An oasis in the desert that surrounds it for much of its course, the river sustained numerous Indigenous peoples both before and after the genocidal colonization of the Southwest, and since the U.S. conquered the region from Mexico it has been a lifeline for American settlers.
Around a century ago, Western states began dividing the Colorado’s water among them, building massive dams and channeling water hundreds of miles to sprawling farms on previously desert-like lands and to rapidly expanding arid cities including Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Diego and Las Vegas.
Under the Colorado River Compact, states — without consulting Indigenous tribes — agreed to annual water allocations that they must use in full or face usage-based cuts the following year. This “use it or lose it” system has created what critics call absurd incentives for farmers to grow water-intensive crops in the desert.
Today, around three-quarters of the river’s flow is siphoned off to irrigate more than five million acres of farmland, according to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Hydroelectric plants along the Colorado also generate more than 12 billion kilowatt hours of electricity annually.
In recent decades, the river has been running especially low as worsening droughts driven by the climate emergency have gripped the Southwest and as the population of the nation’s driest region explodes. The Colorado no longer empties into the sea; models predict that by the year 2100 its flow could be further reduced by more than half.
A year ago, the U.S. Department of the Interior declared the first-ever tier 1 water shortage for the Colorado River, prompting cuts to Arizona farmers amid historic drought.
Inadequate rain and snowfall over the past year have exacerbated the crisis, with Lake Mead — the largest U.S. reservoir and a product of damming the river — now at just 27% of its full capacity and Lake Powell expected to come within 5 feet of losing hydropower by early 2023.
John Entsminger, general manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority and the state’s lead Colorado River negotiator, warned Monday in a letter to U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland that the “unreasonable expectations of water users, including the prices and drought profiteering proposals, only further divide common goals and interests.”
“Through our collective inaction, the federal government, the basin states, and every water user on the Colorado River is complicit in allowing the situation to reach this point,” he continued.
“We are at the stage where basin-wide every drop counts, and every single drop we are short of achieving two to four million acre-feet in permanent reductions draws us a step closer to the catastrophic collapse of the system,” added Entsminger, “as well as draconian water management practices to protect health and human safety that we have successfully staved off in the past through cooperation.”
Originally published by Common Dreams.
Brett Wilkins
Brett Wilkins is staff writer for Common Dreams.
Build NAWAPA XXI
by Michael Kirsch
For a nation to have the moral and economic fitness to survive, its present must be dedicated to creating its future. An excerpt from a LaRouche PAC Pamphlet.
[PDF version of this extract]
Glass-Steagall halts the collapse, cancelling the bail-in and bail-out system, and a credit system creates the potential for economic growth. Credit only functions with goals and an orientation for the economy. We will need a specific project-orientation that can capture the imagination of the citizenry, rapidly create large numbers of opportunities for skilled productive employment, and generate a guaranteed process of economic growth in the coming decades. Surveying the needed improvements in our nation, we see the collapse of our water resources and food supply are arguably the most pressing concerns, both immediately and in the longer term. NAWAPA XXI, an updated version of a project proposed by the Ralph Parsons Company in 1964, answers these needs.
NAWAPA XXI is a resource development plan for a continental water management system, built in collaboration with Canada and Mexico. This proposal will launch the greatest development of North America in history; it will double irrigated agricultural farmland, provide ample hydroelectric power, mitigate or eliminate the risk of floods and droughts, balance the continent’s water distribution, and create 7 million highly skilled and highly productive jobs.
Such a plan is essential. Earlier prospects for nuclear desalination and continent-scale water management systems were sabotaged by the anti-growth and “environmentalist” policies of the 1960s and ’70s, with results that now pose an immediate threat to our ability to supply the most basic of needs: food.
Short-term improvements can come from changing farm policy, regulating commodity speculation, and eliminating the destructive transformation of food into fuel. But shrinking water resources and diminishing groundwater supplies mean sharply reduced population potentials in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico in the future, unless NAWAPA XXI is built.
Water, Food Crisis, and Depopulation:
Western States Now Parched
The majority of U.S. food production lies in the western states. Lack of water availability in the highly irrigation-dependent and agriculturally productive West is leading to the shutdown of food production. This is not a description of the distant future, but of our immediate present.
From 1950 to 1980, the area of irrigated farmland rose from 25 to 58 million acres, but since then has gone nowhere, and in recent years has begun to decline. Currently, some 75% of irrigated farming in the U.S takes place in the 17 western states.
In the Southwest, river flow is very limited: The 32 million acre feet per year (MAFY) flow of the Sacramento (17), San Joaquin (3.4), Colorado (11), and Rio Grande (0.7) river systems, while brilliantly developed in the beginning of the 20th Century, are almost completely used. Water from just one river, the tapped Colorado River, irrigates roughly 15% of the crops in the United States. Throughout the 17 western states, reservoir levels are declining.
In the High Plains States, agriculture is largely dependent on the Ogallala Aquifer, whose water provides for almost 30% of all irrigated agriculture in the U.S., irrigating more than 15 million acres of crops each year; those water levels are dropping.
The lack of river water has led to increased groundwater use. Even before our current drought episode—considered the worst in 50 years—large parts of the Southwest and High Plains states have come to be reliant on more and deeper wells. Pumping of groundwater for irrigation, as of 2005, was three times the volume in 1950.
Land subsidence is extensive from Southern California, to West Texas, to Nebraska. Salination of farmland is worsening, for lack of flow-through of fresh water to flush the soils. One-fifth of California’s aquifers are in serious over-draft. The acreage under production in the Central Valley has been declining. New Mexico and West Texas are already 90% dependent on wells, but wells are running dry.
The water table of the mid- and southern- Ogallala Aquifer region (the Southern High Plains States) has plunged. In many areas, water levels have plunged by 50 to 200 feet, compared to pre-pumping levels, and the rates are accelerating. The aquifers are not recharging; more and more farmland is being abandoned as pumping costs increase, water availability decreases, and aquifer levels drop.
Add up all these figures, and the only conclusion is a dramatic food crisis, and consequent depopulation of the United States, Canada, and Mexico.
The chief cause of this crisis has been the prevention of launching a cooperative agreement among the sovereign nations of North America to fully develop their resources as a coordinated system. The basis for such an agreement between was established in the 1960s.
The History of NAWAPA
The Tennessee Valley Authority of President Franklin Roosevelt demonstrated that man was capable of harnessing not just the flow of rivers—turning what had been an enemy of the people living there into an ally working along their side—but of bringing the functioning of entire river systems under his conscious control. With locks, dams, canals, and reservoirs, we were able to bring the entire hydrological cycle of the Tennessee Valley under our dominion and induce the once wild rivers to act at our behest, generating abundant electricity and irrigating our fields. At the same time, large Colorado River storage facilities began to be constructed, followed by the California Water Plan, and similar projects, creating the potential for the enormous productivity of western agriculture.
At the end of the 1950s, a similar design was conceived for river systems from the Mississippi River all the way west, and north to the Arctic, named the North American Water and Power Alliance (NAWAPA). This would be a TVA, but on a far greater scale. Not only would we engineer the hydrological cycle within a single basin, but we would carry water from one basin to the next, from Alaska to Mexico, linking them to create a North American-wide water management system—a continental TVA.
At the same time, the plans were being laid to bring man into space, engineering studies were underway to demonstrate the feasibility of such a vast project on earth. The NAWAPA plan was originally designed by the Ralph M Parsons engineering firm in California.
In the early 1960s, Sen. Frank Moss of Utah became its leading advocate, forming the Senate Special Sub-committee on Western Water Development to study the feasibility of the plan, as well as entering into an international dialogue with Canada about the shared necessity of the development of both nations. There was early support from Canada’s Prime Minister Lester Pearson, as well as widespread bipartisan support in both houses of Congress. In September of 1965, Senator Moss introduced Senate Concurrent Resolution 55, calling for NAWAPA to be referred to the U.S.-Canada International Joint Commission. A similar resolution was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives for consideration. Among the cosponsors of the NAWAPA resolution was Sen. Robert Kennedy, who wrote in a letter to Moss:
However, though a juggernaut was building in favor of this project, official government action on NAWAPA stalled as the United States was sucked into heavy combat in Vietnam in the years following John F. Kennedy’s death.
Though support for the project continued among leadership in both the United States and Canada, a cultural paradigm shift was in progress away from Kennedy’s “New Frontiers” and into drugs, existentialism, and radical environmentalism. With the assassination of Robert Kennedy in June of 1968, the formerly brilliant hope of NAWAPA faded. The outlook for infrastructure-building came to a halt and the government of the United States submitted to the formerly intolerable and unscientific Malthusian doctrines of over-population and scarcity of resources, in contrast with all prior trends of mankind’s technological development and role as a creative force on the planet.
Water shortages were guaranteed to come, as pumping drew down underground water levels and aquifers were depleted, while surface water runoff management and reservoirs became completely insufficient for farm, residential, power, manufacturing, and other uses.
The Present Requirement
Having a North American water plan is necessary for the development of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. This is not an optional project. Without integrating the water resources of the continent into a controllable system, increasing population growth, and even maintaining the current population, will not be possible.
The progress of continued application of technology was shut down, when the possibility to build NAWAPA was shut down. NAWAPA was not an option that was turned down, it was a necessity that was blocked.
The sovereign nations of the continent, sharing the same broad Pacific and Atlantic weather systems, must rise to act on the scale of the continent, for the betterment of mankind, and build a North American water management system, which utilizes wasted water resources through a system of drought and flood control.
Project Overview
We live on a continent whose western part has a wide discrepancy of rainfall distribution, due to the particularities of the Pacific Ocean weather system. The area stretching from Alaska and Yukon down to Washington State has 40 times the annual river runoff of the Southwest and northern Mexico. Floods in some regions, and droughts in others, unpredictably wreak havoc, decimating food supplies and destroying cities. NAWAPA XXI will create a continental system of water regulation that can redistribute wasted runoff waters of northern Canada and Alaska to make the Great American Desert bloom, and turn would-be flood waters in one area into the means for fighting drought in another, all through the construction of a massive infrastructural network which can direct these flows and provide a scientific analysis of their best use.
At first thought, it would seem that to move some of this extra runoff to areas where there is little, a very long canal or series of pipelines would be required, but closer inspection shows that such a canal is already built. More specifically, there is a continuous stretch of natural canals, in the form of Rocky Mountain trenches and valleys, stretching from southeast Alaska through southern Idaho, roughly 2,000 miles. All that is required is the construction of 31 dams along the route, and a mountain reservoir system can be formed, capable of making a portion of annual runoff available as permanent source of water to the Great American Desert, which will last as long as the rain continues to fall in the northern mountains of the continent.
Such water transfer would more than double the amount of agricultural land under irrigation west of the Mississippi. It would provide an enduring water supply for cities, farms, and industries across the Southwest, and secure livelihoods for generations to come. The construction of the northern storage and power system will bring with it the industrialization of Alaska, the rapid development of British Columbia, and the general development of the continent as a whole. Implementing the project will save and revive vital industries and technological capabilities, and create millions of long-term productive jobs. In addition to the on-site construction and site preparation for the project, manufacturing all over the country will be dramatically expanded to meet the needs.
To speak quantitatively about these volumes of water, the usual unit is millions of acre-feet per year (MAFY). Rainfall in Alaska, Yukon, and British Columbia is about 2,200 MAFY, and runoff is about 1,300 MAFY, while the catchment areas in Alaska and Canada have an annual runoff of 630 MAFY. In comparison, the southwest U.S. has a total runoff of only 32 MAFY.
Strategically located dams and tunnels will connect collected runoff of the Susitna, Copper, and Tanana River valleys to the Yukon River valley, forming a giant reservoir, out of which water will be joined with the Taku River, where a pump lift will bring water into the Stikine, Nass, and Skeena river valleys, joining two large lakes north of Prince George, British Columbia. From there, the water will be pumped into the Rocky Mountain Trench reservoir, formed by three dams at the head waters of the Fraser River. From there the water would be be delivered into the United States and Mexico, entering Montana and Idaho, completing the 2,000-mile mountain reservoir system before tunneling into the Great Basin.
An additional branch of the plan contemplates an industrial corridor and barge canal to be built across the Canadian prairies, connecting the Peace River to Lesser Slave Lake, to the Saskatchewan and Qu’Appelle Rivers, to Lake Winnipeg, and Lake Superior. Sufficient water supplies will be drawn from the canal for the needs of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. The source of the water would be primarily from the upper tributaries of the Mackenzie River, whose mean discharge is 230 MAFY. A regulation system of the Mississippi and Missouri rivers, as well as potentially the Great Lakes, would rely on the excess runoff from this system. Additional plans, such as diversion of James Bay runoff, could be incorporated into the final design.
All of these plans will form an interconnected grid across the continent, which can divert water as needed to minimize the effects of droughts and flood. The whole area can be managed as a single system. For the first time in history, mankind will be acting on an entire continent. Studies indicate that water falling on land is typically “recycled” 2.7 times through evaporation and re-precipitation.
As NAWAPA XXI comes into operation, there will be surprises, as the water recycling creates a broader hydrological effect than the direct water contributions from the distribution system itself. By consciously changing the local atmospheric and soil moisture, we set the conditions for learning much more about the functioning of the earth and its biosphere as a system. Detailed descriptions follow.
Conclusion: NAWAPA XXI Imperative
Such a system must be begun to be constructed in the next few years. Government negotiations must begin with Canada and Mexico, with the goal of a joint credit and cooperation agreement by the United States for the building of NAWAPA XXI over a period of 15-20 years.
NAWAPA XXI will make it possible for the nations of North America to increase their agricultural and industrial power into the foreseeable future, rather than undergo self-cannibalization and allow whole sections of the United States to be shut down and depopulated.
Studies on the negative impacts of dam-building should be thrown aside. The failure to build the project has had the worst effects of all: the collapse of food production, abandonment of land, decreasing production and industry, and the threatened shutdown of whole cities throughout the West. The dam-building process must continue. Mankind must build the higher process which takes mastery of the biosphere’s cycles. That is real scientific development, not a stagnant process of watching our cities die and our farms close, and our population shrink, by submission to an ideology.
The historical development of the biosphere shows the stunning error of the over-population ideology. Increasing consumption of resources and energy in each evolutionary step of the biosphere has been the rule, made possible not by simply increasing consumption, but by increasing the supply through additions of new principles and new complexity to the system. Mankind’s own technological advancement has mirrored this evolutionary process, something impossible for other animal species: Scientific discoveries and their application create new organizations, accessibility, and coordination of resources, as well as wholly new resources.
A society that willfully imposes an ideology that collapses its own growth process—an ideology at odds with the scientific history of the energy-flow of the biosphere and mankind’s role in it—is unfit to survive. Only a fundamental break with the irrational ideology of over-population and conservation of resources, will lead to the sustainable development of mankind over the coming decades. Let us reverse the four decades of cultural and economic decay that we suffer from today, pick up where Kennedy left off, and turn our generation of youth and young adults from being a wasted generation into the generation that built NAWAPA XXI.
Back to top
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
Republishing Guidelines