WeAreChange

BREAKING: I Can’t Believe They Got Away With THIS!

BREAKING: I Can’t Believe They Got Away With THIS!Posted: 12 Nov 2020 01:28 PM PSTIn today’s video, we cover major breaking news in the elite child trafficking ring case.Follow us on Telegram: t.me/s/News4AChangeSign up for our newsletter: bit.ly/3ijjAopSubscribe on LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@wearechange:1Use Brave Browser to earn crypto: bit.ly/38PMffDImprove your gut health: bit.ly/34GHbdYFilter your water: bit.ly/37QriDtStorable food for emergencies: SafePreparedAndReady.com#1 best source of Collagen: bit.ly/3mw5uRK#1 best VPN to use: bit.ly/3iT4Ew3Exclusive members-only content:-> wearechange.org/donate-> patreon.com/WeAreChange-> subscribestar.com/wearechangeThe post BREAKING: I Can’t Believe They Got Away With THIS! appeared first on We Are Change.
No Action Against Prosecutors Who Made Epstein’s Sweetheart Deal, Justice Department Probe FindsPosted: 12 Nov 2020 11:57 AM PSTThe Justice Department’s investigation into the prosecutors who oversaw deceased pedophile/financier Jeffrey Epstein’s sweetheart deal—the same deal that led to Epstein’s initial conviction and imprisonment in Florida more than 10 years ago—has determined that while the men exercised “poor judgment”, they didn’t break the law.The findings, released by Sen. Ben Sasse on Thursday, follow an inquiry by the DoJ’s office of professional responsibility. The group of prosecutors includes former Trump Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, who has previously suggested that at the time that Epstein had been ‘protected’ because he was a special asset. Acosta was pushed out of his cabinet-level role last year.“Letting a well-connected billionaire get away with child rape and international sex trafficking isn’t ‘poor judgment’—it is a disgusting failure,” Sasse said. “Americans ought to be enraged.”The prosecutors, who reported to Acosta (at the time he was the US attorney overseeing that territory) explored reports that Epstein had abused dozens of young girls in his Palm Beach mansion in the early 2000s. Epstein copped a plea to lower-level state charges involving the abuse of a single victim.The Department of Justice reportedly briefed several of Epstein’s victims on the findings on Friday in Miami.While this inquiry into the prosecutors is over, two other federal investigations involving Epstein and potential enablers are ongoing.Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permissionThe post No Action Against Prosecutors Who Made Epstein’s Sweetheart Deal, Justice Department Probe Finds appeared first on We Are Change.
Less Than Half of Americans Likely to Comply With New Lockdown Orders: GallupPosted: 12 Nov 2020 11:45 AM PSTEarlier we featured the worrisome prospect of a second national coronavirus lockdown under a future Biden administration, considering the latest scientist to join Joe Biden’s “special coronavirus transition advisory team” is calling for just that.Dr. Michael Osterholm, who serves as director of the Center of Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, now one of Biden’s coronavirus task force doctors told Yahoo News the following on Wednesday: “We could pay for a package right now to cover all of the lost wages for individual workers… if we did that, then we could lockdown for 4 to 6 weeks.”But we know that’s unlikely to go well based on the latest polling data, as it appears the majority of Americans would not conform to such new stay-at-home orders and travel restrictions:Americans are less likely to comply with another coronavirus lockdown than they were in the spring, with fewer than half saying in a new poll that they’re very likely to stay home this time around, according to a new Gallup Poll released as record numbers of cases skyrocket nationwide.Here’s the data, according to Gallup, based on the poll taken between Oct.19 and Nov.1:49% say they’re “very likely” to stay home for a month if mandated, down from 67% who said they would in the spring.18% said they were “somewhat likely” to comply.One-third said they would be “unlikely” to comply with new lockdown orders.This despite 61% saying they believe the situation is getting worse.The number of respondents who said they’d be unlikely to comply is double the rate seen from polls in the spring.However, it appears more Americans are intentional about social distancing measures, including wearing masks, compared to in the spring.One of Biden’s new coronavirus task force doctors floating the idea of a 4-6 week lockdown:“We could pay for a package right now to cover all of the lost wages for individual workers … if we did that, then we could lockdown for 4 to 6 weeks.”pic.twitter.com/zNmuQvPpIJ— Zack Guzman (@zGuz) November 11, 2020As Newsmax summarizes of the numbers: “Meanwhile, the number of people who are wearing masks has gone up sharply.” The report states “Only about half of Americans reported in April that they were wearing masks, just after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggested wearing them. Now, 88% reported they wear masks, after the number went up to 92% in July.”Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permissionThe post Less Than Half of Americans Likely to Comply With New Lockdown Orders: Gallup appeared first on We Are Change.
Americans Didn’t Vote Against Trump, They Voted Against More Media Psychological AbusePosted: 11 Nov 2020 08:29 PM PSTThe word “coup” is being thrown about in American liberal media today, not because US liberals suddenly became uncomfortable with the fact that their nation constantly stages coups and topples governments around the world as a matter of routine policy, but because they are all talking about (you guessed it) Donald Trump.To be clear, none of the high-powered influencers who have been promoting the use of this word actually believe there is any possibility that Donald Trump will somehow remain in office after January of next year when he loses his legal appeals against the official results of the election, which would be the thing that a coup is. There is no means or institutional support through which the sitting president could accomplish such a thing. This is not a coup, it’s a glorified temper tantrum. Trump will leave office at the appointed time.The establishment narrative managers are not terrifying their audiences with this word because they believe there is any danger of a coup actually happening. They are doing it because it’s their last chance to use Trump to psychologically abuse their audiences for clicks.Warnings of a “coup” should at least come with a plausible mechanism by which a coup could be carried out.”The courts”Ok which court? Deciding which case about what state on which grounds?”The military”Which unit? Doing what? Under whose command?”Intelligence”Huh? https://t.co/0eDTAmxnkq— Alice the Coup-Panic Soother ??? ?? (@AliceFromQueens) November 11, 2020Last year the Pacific Standard published a report on “Trump Anxiety Disorder” or “Trump Hypersensitive Unexplained Disorder,” which it describes as follows:As the possibility of a Hillary Clinton victory began to slip away — and the possibility of a Donald Trump presidency became more and more certain — the contours of the new age of American anxiety began to take shape. In a 2017 column, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank described this phenomenon as “Trump Hypertensive Unexplained Disorder”: Overeating. Headaches. Fainting. Irregular heartbeat. Chronic neck pain. Depression. Irritable bowel syndrome. Tightness in the chest. Shortness of breath. Teeth grinding. Stomach ulcer. Indigestion. Shingles. Eye twitching. Nausea. Irritability. High blood sugar. Tinnitus. Reduced immunity. Racing pulse. Shaking limbs. Hair loss. Acid reflux. Deteriorating vision. Stroke. Heart attack. It was a veritable organ recital.Two years later, the physiological effects of the Trump administration aren’t going away. A growing body of research has tracked the detrimental impacts of Trump-related stress on broad segments of the American population, from young adults to women, to racial and LGBT communities.The results aren’t good.“Trump Anxiety Disorder” has continued to feature in mass media stories to this day, right up until shortly before the election. The narrative has been that Trump is so horrible that he is somehow causing liberals to have psychological breakdowns with his awfulness.What gets overlooked in these analyses, as is so often the case with human perception in general, is the means by which people are taking in the information that is making them so anxious — in this case the news media.It is not Trump himself who’s been making people feel terrified of a tyrannical Russian agent ending democracy in America and ruling with an iron fist, it is years of shrieking, hysterical coverage about Trump from the mass media.Without all the deranged and persistent fearmongering, driven by a disdain for Trump’s unrefined narrative management style and an insatiable hunger for ratings and clicks, it would never have occurred to Americans that they should be more terrified of this president than of any other shitty Reaganite Republican. The Russian collusion narrative which dominated most of Trump’s presidency turned out to be essentially nothing. The concentration camps, millions of deportations and armed militias driving non-whites out of the country that we were promised never came; he never even came anywhere close to Obama’s deportation numbers and his support from minorities actually went up. He hasn’t been any more warlike than his predecessors overall, and by some measures arguably less so. Most Americans actually reported that their lives had improved over Trump’s term before the pandemic hit.If people had just been given raw information about Trump’s presidency, they would have seen a lot of bad things, but things that are bad in the same way all the horrible aspects of the most destructive government on earth are bad. They wouldn’t have known to be horrified and anxious and have headaches and irritable bowel syndrome. They would have handled themselves in about the same way they always handled themselves during the administration of a president they didn’t like.Instead, they were psychologically terrorized. Made frightened, sick and traumatized by mass media pundits who only care about ratings and clicks, as was made clear when CBS chief Les Moonves famously said that Trump is bad for America but great for CBS. Dragged through years of Russia hysteria and Trump hysteria with any excuse to spin Trump’s presidency as a remarkable departure from norms, when in reality it was anything but. It was a fairly conventional Republican presidency.The MSM is brutalizing the American psyche day in and day out with its relentless shrieking coverage of Trump, and it’s killing them. Republicans call it “Trump Derangement Syndrome”, Dems call it “Trump Anxiety Disorder”, but it’s not. It’s psychological abuse via mass media. https://t.co/2dpDTznBRT— Caitlin Johnstone ? (@caitoz) January 15, 2019In reality, though most of them probably did not realize it, this is what Americans were actually voting against when they turned out in record numbers to cast their votes. Not against Trump, but against this continued psychological abuse they’ve been suffering both directly and indirectly from the mass media. Against being bashed in the face by shrieking, hysterical bullshit that hurts their bodies and makes them feel crazy, and against the unpleasantness of having to interact with stressed-out compatriots who haven’t been putting up well with the abuse.It wasn’t a “Get him out” vote, it was a “Make it stop” vote.Meanwhile, another pernicious effect of making Trump seem uniquely horrible has been retroactively making his predecessors seem nice by comparison, which is why George W Bush now enjoys majority support among Democrats after years of unpopularity. Their depravity is hidden behind a media-generated wall labeled “NOT TRUMP”. And when Biden steps into office, his depravity will be hidden from view in the same way, neutering all mainstream opposition to his most deadly and dangerous actions.Republished from CaitlinJohnstone.com with permissionThe post Americans Didn’t Vote Against Trump, They Voted Against More Media Psychological Abuse appeared first on We Are Change.
Jeffrey Toobin Fired From New Yorker for Jerking Off During Zoom CallPosted: 11 Nov 2020 04:06 PM PSTJournalist Jeffrey Toobin, who was suspended by CNN and The New Yorker after he was caught masturbating on a Zoom call last month in full view of colleagues, has been fired by the latter publication.Toobin confirmed his firing in a Wednesday tweet, writing “I was fired today by @NewYorker after 27 years as a Staff Writer.”I was fired today by @NewYorker after 27 years as a Staff Writer. I will always love the magazine, will miss my colleagues, and will look forward to reading their work.— Jeffrey Toobin (@JeffreyToobin) November 11, 2020In a memo to Condé Nast employees, executive Stan Duncan wrote: “I am writing to share with you that our investigation regarding Jeffrey Toobin is complete, and as a result, he is no longer affiliated with our company.”“I want to assure everyone that we take workplace matters seriously. We are committed to fostering an environment where everyone feels respected and upholds our standards of conduct.”Meanwhile, a New Yorker spokesperson told The Hill: “As a result of our investigation, Jeffrey Toobin is no longer affiliated with the company.”After originally reporting on October 19 that Toobin had ‘exposed himself’ during the zoom call, Vice issued a late day correction to note that Toobin was actively jerking off.“This piece has been updated with more detail about the call and the headline has been updated to reflect that Toobin was masturbating.” –ViceToobin told Vice that he had “made an embarrassingly stupid mistake, believing I was off camera,” before apologizing to his wife, family, friends and co-workers.”“I believed I was not visible on Zoom,” he added.CNN, meanwhile, has yet to take action against Toobin, who will quite literally never live this down.He had an accident pic.twitter.com/Tw95kd4CGX— Lit News Network (@litnewsnet) November 11, 2020Would you say they’re giving you the shaft? https://t.co/8TYnZEiAK6— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) November 11, 2020Hard times ?seriously though… thought you would have pulled it off to stay.Ha!!!Just kidding…. good luck… job market is stiff.— President Elect Erica or PEE for short ? (@ZiaErica) November 11, 2020Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permissionThe post Jeffrey Toobin Fired From New Yorker for Jerking Off During Zoom Call appeared first on We Are Change.
WOW! They Already Regret Voting For Him!Posted: 11 Nov 2020 01:13 PM PSTIn today’s video, we cover Joe Biden and other politicians’ lockdown plans.Follow us on Telegram: t.me/s/News4AChangeSign up for our newsletter: bit.ly/3ijjAopSubscribe on LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@wearechange:1Use Brave Browser to earn crypto: bit.ly/38PMffDImprove your gut health: bit.ly/34GHbdYFilter your water: bit.ly/37QriDtStorable food for emergencies: SafePreparedAndReady.com#1 best source of Collagen: bit.ly/3mw5uRK#1 best VPN to use: bit.ly/3iT4Ew3Exclusive members-only content:-> wearechange.org/donate-> patreon.com/WeAreChange-> subscribestar.com/wearechangeThe post WOW! They Already Regret Voting For Him! appeared first on We Are Change.

You may also like...

Translate »