EIR Daily Alert Service, THURSDAY, JUNE 27, 2019

THURSDAY, JUNE 27, 2019
Volume 6, Number 127
EIR Daily Alert Service
P.O. Box 17390, Washington, DC 20041-0390
  • Great Power Leaders Gather at G20 for Historic Moment To Stop War, Turn to New Paradigm
  • NATO Makes Insane Ultimatum to Russia: You Have Five Weeks To Destroy Missiles!
  • Russia Promises ‘Countervailing Military Measures’in Response to NATO Ultimatum
  • Global Times Editorializes, Pompeo’s ‘Phenomenally Abominable’ Diplomacy ‘Unsettles the World’
  • Trump Departed for Japan, After Housrs of Live Broadcasts in 2020 Campaign Mode
  • Virginia State Sen. Richard Black Warned Against War on Iran, ‘I Voted for Trump, Not Bolton
  • Illinois Legalizes Cannabis, Missouri Doctors Rebel, and EIR Exposes ‘Menticide by Marijuana’
  • When Future Historians Review This Week, Will They See a Turning Point, or the Road to Hell?
  • Russia, China, India Meeting, Set for the G20, Is Considered ‘Very Significant’
  • Bolivia’s New Nuclear, Scientific Infrastructure Offers a 30-Year Development Perspective
  • German Secret Intelligence Against China’s Belt and Road

EDITORIAL

Great Power Leaders Gather at G20 for Historic Moment To Stop War, Turn to New Paradigm

June 26 (EIRNS)—National leaders are already en route or have arrived in Osaka, Japan for the Group of 20 Summit, June 28-29, where, on the sidelines, many meetings are set between heads of state of major powers. Among the many bilateral and multilateral meetings, are the highly significant one-on-one talks set between President Donald Trump and the three leaders—Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, among others. These constitute the historic opportunity to override the intense dirty operations, such as Russiagate or Trumpgate, thrown against the U.S. Presidency and American people, and demonizing China and Russia, by the networks of the expiring British Empire and financial circles, whose geopolitical ploys to pit the U.S. against Russia, China, Iran, Syria, Venezuela, and many more, are threatening all-out war.

Today, at the same time that Trump was departing for Japan, LaRouche PAC activists were on Capitol Hill, to distribute key information to all 535 Congressional offices, notably, the announcement of the two new videos—the “Schiller Institute Memorial Concert: The Triumph of Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. (1922-2019)” and “Feature Documentary—The LaRouche Case: Robert Mueller’s First Hit Job”; and the June 24 statement, “Stop World War III; Exonerate LaRouche.” The record of Lyndon LaRouche shows clearly his incomparable development programs and interventions, whose principles are sorely needed at this time, and whose exoneration will free the spirit and courage to make his vision reality.

LaRouche PAC also circulated to Congress a new national release “When Future Historians Review This Week, Will They See a Turning Point, or a Descent on the Road to Hell?” This statement points out, “As the President goes to Osaka, where the heads of the United States, Russia, China, and India need to be free to discuss a four powers arrangement for peace, development, and a new financial architecture, the specter of ultimate war is being used to terrorize the world, and to change the subject. This must not be allowed.”

The danger of war will be the focus of LaRouche PAC’s Friday Webcast June 28, with host Matthew Ogden and guest Paul Gallagher, who will report on the threat of a repeat of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.

The particular war danger exposed in the LaRouche PAC statement is that recent laws have authorized a U.S. Cyber Command, empowered to carry out attacks on other nations, without the President’s approval or even knowledge! It takes away the opportunity for a President to exercise judgment to prevent unwarranted attacks, counterattacks, and all-out war, as shown in what Trump fortunately did last week to stop a military strike on Iran. The kind of corruption of institutions and lawlessness that would set up such a stealth Cyber Command came about during the recent years of the insane Russiagate period, orchestrated by British intelligence and its American partners in crime.

Then yesterday, from the same networks, the war hawks of either neo-con or neo-lib stripe, comes a new threat to sabotage the G20 “Four Power” potential. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg issued an ultimatum to Russia that it has five weeks to dismantle its “SSC-8” missile system, “or else.” This threat is on the agenda today of NATO defense ministers meeting in Brussels. That is, by Aug. 3, Russia must destroy a certain class of missiles Stoltenberg charges are against the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.

Today came the Russian reply. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said that when NATO’s “threats begin to materialize into real action, we will have to take countervailing military measures.”

Thus, NATO set into play a new anti-Russia brinksmanship on the eve of the critical G20 Summit. Despite all this, Trump notably expressed today his pleasure at the thought of conferring with his “friends” this coming weekend. He said of China, “I want to have a good relationship with China. Xi is a close personal friend—he’s fantastic.”

STRATEGIC WAR DANGER

NATO Makes Insane Ultimatum to Russia: You Have Five Weeks To Destroy Missiles!

June 26 (EIRNS)—NATO said yesterday that Russia must destroy its short-range nuclear-ready cruise missile system, or the Alliance will be forced to respond. Speaking at a press conference in at NATO headquarters in Brussels on June 25, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said Russia had just five weeks to scrap the system and “save the treaty”! “We call on Russia to take the responsible path. Unfortunately, we have seen no indication that Russia intends to do so,” he said.

The U.S. has previously said it will quit a decades-old missile treaty with Russia if the latter fails to destroy the missile, labeled the SSC-8 by NATO.

The 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty between the U.S. and Russia sought to eliminate nuclear and conventional missiles, as well as their launchers, with short ranges (310-620 miles) and intermediate ranges (620-3,420 miles). NATO has asserted that the SSC-8 violates those terms and that Russia has been deploying the system at locations which could threaten countries across Europe.

Stoltenberg will chair a meeting of NATO member defense ministers set for today. He said that gathering, which will include U.S. Acting Defense Secretary Mark Esper, would look at NATO’s next steps “in the event that Russia does not comply.”

The NATO chief said the response would be “defensive, measured and coordinated,” though it would not result in the deployment of land-based nuclear missiles. “But as Russia is deploying new missiles, we must ensure that our deterrence and defense remains credible and effective. This is NATO’s job.”

Already before these ultimative five weeks run out, and long before Stoltenberg’s ridiculous show, NATO—that is the United States Navy—has deployed missile-carrying destroyers in the Baltic Sea and in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea/Black Sea, not to mention the submarines in the Arctic region, all of them threatening Russia with cruise missiles which can carry nuclear warheads.

Russia Promises ‘Countervailing Military Measures’ in Response to NATO Ultimatum

June 26 (EIRNS)—In response to the June 25 demand by NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg that Russia destroy its 9M729 cruise missiles (NATO designation SSC-8) within five weeks for allegedly violating the INF Treaty or NATO will take countermeasures, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov angrily told reporters in Moscow, this morning, that Moscow will be forced to take “countervailing military measures” should NATO make good on its threats.

“Attempts to portray what is happening as a military and political response to Russia’s actions reek of a propaganda campaign with a large element of deliberate misinformation being fed to global public opinion,” Ryabkov said today, reported TASS. “When these threats begin to materialize into real action, we will have to take countervailing military measures.”

Over the past years, the Alliance’s member-states have adopted an ideology of a dual-track approach to their relations with Russia: to contain it along with holding dialogue on the issues which NATO seeks to discuss. Russia will pursue a similar line, Ryabkov stressed. “We will contain NATO’s aggressive plans, measure them and adopt a very selective approach to dialogue with the Alliance, which the member-states of this organization are promoting.”

Global Times Editorializes, Pompeo’s ‘Phenomenally Abominable’ Diplomacy ‘Unsettles the World’

June 26 (EIRNS)—For the second day in a row, under the headline, “Pompeo’s Diplomacy Unsettles the World,” China’s Global Timesscathingly editorialized against Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warning that his “extreme political bias and arrogant ideological clamor are phenomenally abominable.” Pompeo is attempting to transform U.S. diplomacy “in a way that astonishes the world, but refuses to be reformed by diplomacy,” the daily declares.

Global Times recalls that when Pompeo was a congressman (2011-17), he authored 24 pieces of anti-China legislation and exerted pressure on China in a variety of ways. Now, as Secretary of State, “he has even more ways to oppose China. He is becoming hysterical, using his power to blend his personal anti-China will with U.S. national policy.” His June 2018 speech at the Detroit Economic Club was instructive, the daily reports, writing: “Feeling uncomfortable with certain successful economies that have not adopted the U.S. model, he claimed that ‘the dynamism, the creativity and the innovation … can only happen in a political environment like ours.’ ”

“Like ours”? In an April 15 speech at Texas A&M University, Pompeo boasted that when he was CIA Director (January 2017-April 2018), “we lied, we cheated, we stole … it was like we had entire training courses. It reminds you of the glory of the American experiment.” The Chinese people will remember Pompeo as a representative “who breaks the bottom line of U.S. diplomatic ethics. Letting such a person dominate U.S. diplomacy will unsettle the world and put global peace at risk,” Global Times warns.

Note that today, the Pyongyang’s Korean Central News Agency quoted the North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman urging Washington to exclude Pompeo from any nuclear negotiations between the two countries, to ensure progress in the stalled talks, according to the Korea Times. The spokesman referred to Pompeo’s recent claim that Western sanctions were affecting 80% of North Korea’s economy, calling it sophistry. “If the U.S.-led sanctions affect more than 80% of the North Korean economy, is it the goal of the U.S. to raise the figure to 100%?” the official demanded to know.

“If U.S. policymakers with a sense of hostility against the North keep engaging in the negotiations, it will be hard for the two sides to improve bilateral relations and achieve denuclearization of the peninsula,” the Foreign Ministry spokesman warned. Pompeo’s remark “is the pinnacle of hostility against the North, and this also goes against the joint declaration signed by the leaders of the two countries in Singapore” last year.

U.S. POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC

Trump Departed for Japan, after Hours of Live Broadcasts in 2020 Campaign Mode

June 26 (EIRNS)—On the eve of this weekend’s G20 summit in Japan, President Donald Trump made some two hours of live TV presentations out of Washington, before taking off this afternoon for Japan. He was on Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo for 45 minutes. Then later he spoke, which was streamed live, for over an hour to the Faith and Freedom Coalition “Road to Majority” conference; he had addressed the religion-based group in 2016 and 2017, as well.

In short, Trump was very much in campaign mode for 2020. He hit no high notes on strategic matters. His lowest notes were on the U.S. economy, praising it as “booming … soaring … maybethe greatest ever in history.” In his superlatives, he cited lifting 6 million Americans coming off food stamps.

A loud sour note was his praise for the notorious European Central Bank President Mario Draghi, whom he lauded for his “quantitative easing.” He criticized Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for his “quantitative tightening.”

On trade matters, while telling Bartiromo that the U.S. economy is doing wonderfully, Trump stated that he would be “happy either way” with or without a China trade deal, and would not hesitate to impose new tariffs if necessary. He repeated that he wants to have a good relationship with China, pointing to his warm personal friendship with the “fantastic” Xi Jinping, but then argued that China’s economy is “going down the tubes,” and that the U.S. has been taken advantage of by practically every nation in the world.

Trump replied “I hope we don’t,” when asked if he intends to go to war with Iran, but said the U.S. is in a very strong position if something were to happen. A war with Iran “wouldn’t last very long,” he said, and there would be no boots on the ground.

Virginia State Sen. Richard Black Warned against War on Iran, ‘I Voted for Trump, Not Bolton’

June 26 (EIRNS)—Virginia state Senator Richard Black (R) appeared on RT America June 21, to address the Iran crisis. Responding to questions from “Big Picture” host Holland Cooke, Senator Black made the point that Iran represents absolutely no threat to U.S. national security and advised President Donald Trump to stand down the military and remove U.S. ships and manpower from provocative positions.

Regarding Iran’s shooting down a U.S. drone, Black, who retired with the rank of colonel from the Army Judge Advocate General’s Corps, indicated that he believed that the U.S. drone was over Iranian airspace, one element of evidence being that Iran, and not the U.S. military, was able to recover the drone.

Once again Senator Black warned of the magnitude of the casualties involved in a war, saying he believed that at least 20,000 U.S. troops would be killed and another 60-80,000 wounded. Some 1 million Iranians including men, women and children would be killed, he stated.

Referring to the open letter he had sent to President Trump on May 22, Black reiterated that he had voted to elect Donald Trump—not John Bolton—and that he feared that President Trump would suffer a devastating defeat in 2020 if he allowed the nation to be plunged into war.

Illinois Legalizes Cannabis, Missouri Doctors Rebel, and EIRExposes ‘Menticide by Marijuana’

June 26 (EIRNS)—This week Illinois became the 11th state to approve of marijuana use for “recreational” purposes, allowing individuals small amounts for personal use and sale. An overlapping grouping of states permits marijuana for “medical” purposes. No matter what the distinctions, terms and conditions, all the measures are the same in their destructive effects. Many physicians, medics, emergency workers, police, lawmakers and citizens are not giving up in fighting to roll back this dirty operation to dope and kill people.

EIR’s June 28 issue has published a feature on “Menticide by Marijuana” comprised of two articles: “The Past Is Prologue—Marijuana Legalization: The Murder of Our Youth,” by Denise Ham, which reviews a new book, Tell Your Children the Truth About Marijuana, Mental Illness and Violence, by Alex Berenson; and “Medical Marijuana Is a Fraud,” by Ned Rosinsky, MD.

In Missouri, a fight is underway in the aftermath of a November 2018 ballot referendum, which legalized so-called medical marijuana. In brief, physicians in Missouri’s American Medical Association opposed the referendum, and since it passed, many physicians remain staunch in refusing to certify that their patients can use “medical” marijuana.

Now pot “clinics” have sprung up in Missouri, which on the outside are urgent care clinics that might otherwise treat a non-emergent medical problem, but which are being abused for the small fee for the visit to certify that a patient “needs” marijuana.

When Future Historians Review This Week, Will They See a Turning Point, or the Road to Hell?

June 26 (EIRNS)—LaRouche Political Action Committee published the following statement, “When Future Historians Review This Week, Will They See a Turning Point, or Descent on the Road to Hell?” on June 26:

It is now official that there will be a meeting between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin at the June 28-29 G20 Summit. President Xi Jinping will also conduct a crucial meeting with President Trump there.

These may turn out to be two of the most crucial meetings ever held among heads of state. On Monday, Reuters reported that a senior Russian official, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, had raised a nightmare scenario—of the possible deployment of U.S. missiles near Russian borders turning into a repeat of the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.

Most who lived through that terrifying event never imagined that it would, or even could, ever happen again. What if, however, we are now sleepwalking, as in 1914, as in 1939, into a global war, which would this time be thermonuclear extinction? Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute, prior to receipt of the Russian statement, had already said,

“Who does not wake up and know that we are on the verge of World War Three? Such a person is not in the real world. We are closer to World War Three than at any time, I would say, in the entire postwar (1945) period…. I think it’s a very good thing that Trump intervened at the last moment [to call off air strikes against Iran], but it was 10 minutes before the attack! People should really realize that this is not a joke…. If this would have happened, we may have been on the way to World War Three, and that is not an exaggeration.”

Why is the world closer now to self-extinction than it was in 1962? The treasonous influence of British intelligence on the American electoral process of 2016, known as the “Russiagate” hoax, has now been compounded by their attempt, using the United States Congress in addition to the usual neo-con suspects infesting the Trump Administration, to introduce the insane idea of winning war against Russia through “cyber-methods.”

In the middle of the insanity about Russiagate, during the spring and summer of 2018, a corrupted Congress passed the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act of 2019, overriding President Trump’s direct negotiations with Russia and China and demanding low intensity and prewar maneuvers against Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. In the process, they took away the requirement that the President approve cyberwarfare actions against these four nations, changing the definitions of cyberwarfare in order to give command authority to the U.S. Cyber Command and the Secretary of Defense, rather than the President. They also pre-authorized warfare against these four nations in response to alleged cyberattacks by those four nations. This was the exact area that President Trump had discussed with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki in July of 2018, despite the attempts to use the Russiagate “red herring” to stop that meeting at that time. When, in the Helsinki meeting, the President once again attempted to use his Constitutional authority to directly negotiate with President Putin, opening a critical dialogue about de-escalating cyber warfare between the U.S. and Russia, the British and their assets in the United States intelligence community, the media, and the Congress went absolutely ballistic claiming that Trump had committed treason against the United States!

As a result, as the President goes to Osaka, where the heads of the United States, Russia, China, and India need to be free to discuss a four powers arrangement for peace, development, and a new financial architecture, the specter of ultimate war is being used to terrorize the world and to change the subject. This must not be allowed.

Let us take a page from the diplomacy of President John F. Kennedy, who together with the Soviet Union pulled the world away from the brink of extinction in October 1962. In September 1963, he told the United Nations:

“Finally, in a field where the United States and the Soviet Union have a special capacity—in the field of space—there is room for new cooperation, for further joint efforts in the regulation and exploration of space. I include among these possibilities a joint expedition to the Moon. Space offers no problems of sovereignty…. Surely we should explore whether the scientists and astronauts of our two countries—indeed of all the world—cannot work together in the conquest of space, sending some day in this decade to the Moon not the representatives of a single nation, but the representatives of all of our countries.”

An agreement among the Four Space Powers—Russia, China, India, and the United States—as well as others, to de-escalate the threat of global war through a global coordinated effort in space, in this year of commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the landing of mankind on the Moon, is one idea. This effort, with which John F. Kennedy was so identified, could forge a pathway forward, away from the brink of war, and toward the “Win-Win” cooperation without which the human race has no possible chance of durable, rather than accidental, survival.

Lyndon LaRouche, author of the nuclear defense system known as the Strategic Defense Initiative, proposed an entirely new paradigm for the world. LaRouche developed comprehensive plans for new strategic relationships based on China, Russia, India, and the United States creating a new gold reserve based monetary system which would dedicate its credit to physical development of the world, rather than offshore financial chicanery and usury—the means by which the City of London and Wall Street presently control the world’s finances. For that, LaRouche was defamed and prosecuted by the very same British-directed apparatus which is now going after President Trump, right down to the same prosecutor, Robert S. Mueller III. LaRouche must be exonerated so that any sane policy of international and national development, benefiting all human beings, can be fully discussed, debated, and understood by the American population. Such a debate now, in this time of crisis, is a literal force for peace.

Ask your U.S. Representative or Senator: where do you really stand on war and peace when it comes to Russia and China? Did you vote for the 2019 NDAA in 2018? Do you have any idea at all what was in it? Will you now join a great movement for peace, by acting to eliminate the British imperial system’s treasonous influence on the U.S.?

Will you act to exonerate LaRouche?

THE NEW GLOBAL ECONOMIC ORDER

Russia, China, India Meeting, Set for the G20, Is Considered ‘Very Significant’

June 26 (EIRNS)—China’s Assistant Minister of Foreign Affairs Zhang Jun confirmed on June 24 that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Chinese President Xi Jinping will hold an informal meeting on the sidelines of the June 28-29 G20 summit this weekend.

Describing the meeting as “very significant,” Zhang also underscored that this trilateral mechanism is now institutionalized, the Indian monthly Diplomacy and Beyond reported today. “He also signaled that the trilateral mechanism of Russia, India, and China (RIC) had now become institutionalized,” it wrote. The trio will meet again in September at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok, at which Prime Minister Modi will be the honored guest, at President Putin’s invitation.

Today’s Global Times called for concrete action, beyond “slogans about jointly opposing trade protectionism.” Among the many specific actions it proposes as ways of strengthening economic and trade cooperation, Global Times suggests that improving “the interconnectivity under the SCO [Shanghai Cooperation Organization] or the BRICS framework could be a direction for future cooperation.” Russia has previously proposed the idea of enhancing interconnectivity among BRICS countries, “so that there is sufficient room for the three countries to do more in this regard.” Another proposal involves researching “whether it is possible to connect the International North South Transportation Corridor with the Belt and Road Initiative.”

SCIENCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Bolivia’s New Nuclear, Scientific Infrastructure Offers a 30-Year Development Perspective

June 26 (EIRNS)—During a June 24 ceremony honoring 10 recipients of scholarships who are leaving to study nuclear technology in Russia, Bolivian President Evo Morales and his Vice President Alvaro García Linera offered an optimistic view of the future awaiting the country through the development of nuclear technology and related fields.

With the mastery that these young people acquire in Russia—another group is studying nuclear medicine in Argentina—Bolivians, Morales tweeted, “are advancing together toward our liberation and technological sovereignty.” García Linera further said that these young scientists, a “scientific elite” in training, will be responsible for “the control and direction of the totality of industries and centers of advanced research that Bolivia is building to guarantee Bolivia’s economic future for the next 30 years,” the Bolivian Information Agency reported.

García Linera also said that he foresees a future in which Bolivia would sign agreements with Russia, the U.S., France and others that are “advancing in the production of ecological energy through nuclear fusion.”

In October of this year, the first portion of the Nuclear Technology Research and Development Center in the city of El Alto, near the capital La Paz, will be completed. The center, being built by Russia’s atomic energy agency Rosatom, will consist of a multipurpose irradiation plan (with agricultural applications), a cyclotron and a small research reactor. Three nuclear medicine institutes will also be built, in La Paz, El Alto, and Santa Cruz with the aim of making Bolivia a regional hub for the treatment of cancer. Argentina’s high-tech company INVAP has been contracted to build the three institutes.

At least 140 highly-trained scientists will be required to help run the research center, and for this purpose, Bolivia has been sending groups of young scientists to Russia and Argentina for training. Additional groups will be sent to both countries in the coming months.

COLLAPSING WESTERN FINANCIAL SYSTEM

German Secret Intelligence against China’s Belt and Road

June 26 (EIRNS)—The German government’s domestic intelligence agency Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV) is involved in screening, and potentially prohibiting, Chinese investors’ foreign direct investments (FDI) and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) into Germany’s economy, in areas such as infrastructure, machine tools, and other high-tech companies. The official newsletter of the BfV in October 2018 stated the following: “If parts of the critical infrastructure in Germany are no longer under German control, this can result in threats to the free democratic basic order. For this reason, the BfV is included in the cross-departmental Foreign Trade Law (AWG) examination procedures with regard to foreign direct investment on a case-by-case basis.” AWG is a directive which regulates the legal basis for, among other things, foreign direct investments. According to this directive, all FDI that aims at controlling more than 10% of an asset, belongs to the sector of “critical infrastructure.”

BfV Vice President Michael Niemeier gave a speech at the 7th National Cybersecurity Conference in Potsdam on May 23, 2019, warning of a heightened international threat from hacking, cyber-espionage and security breaches inside critical information infrastructure. Citing a report by British and U.S.-authorities, he put the responsibility squarely on shoulders of the Russian Federation and China. He said: “For in 2018, in particular, the intelligence and security services of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China used cyber-attacks for espionage activities against Germany. We are very worried about cyber-attacks that can be used for sabotage—especially against critical infrastructure.”

Then on 6 June, 2019, the Nordkurier newspaper based in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern state, reported that a regional branch of the BfV had “unambiguously warned” the infrastructure minister of the Mecklenburg-Vorpommern not to continue cooperating with the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. Shortly before that warning, the head of the regional BfV, state Interior Minister Lorenz Caffier, told the press conference releasing the new annual threat assessment report: “Last but not least, the so-called Silk Road Project of China and the associated targeted purchase of German key industries must be perceived as a fundamental threat to freedom and prosperity. The constitutional protection authorities are also anxious to also carry out their early warning function here.”

The annual intelligence report itself makes some far-reaching, but utterly uncorroborated, claims. Chinese intelligence agents, it states, would conduct clandestine recruitment operations, disguised as scientists or consultants. It says: “The Chinese intelligence services are not open, but camouflage themselves as employees of think tanks, as a research fellow or representatives of Chinese departments (e.g., municipalities). Sometimes they also pretend to be a recruiter (headhunter) or managers of consulting firms.”

Reach us at eirdailyalert@larouchepub.com or call 1-571-293-0935

You may also like...