Wikileaks Release is Old Stuff & Other Observations By Jim Stone-Assange May Not Have Been in Embassy For Years; Many Good Points-US Deep State Media

CONFIRMED: WIKILEAKS RELEASED NOTHINGZERO, ZIP, NADA, EVERYTHING EVERYONE IS CLAIMING IS THE DUMP IS STUFF THEY RELEASED LONG AGO, ALL COMPILED ONTO ONE LARGE PAGE. And that’s exactly what I’d expect if Wikileaks is, as I suspected, dead, and was dead before this latest Assange “arrest”.Here is what I really think went on: Assange got removed from the embassy on the night between October 16 and 17 2016. The live stream of this proved something went on the night after Pamela brought him that lunch. Ok, so what if it was spiked with pure psychedelic “whatever? ” Assange would be wrecked for the long haul but would survive. So messed up and delerious he’d think he was dying. Pamela herself said he was not feeling well after eating it. That’s a BIG red flag – probably a secret message to those in the know. He then agrees to be removed from the embassy. The black van takes him away, to a different location for a couple years, and Ecuador plays the game for a payoff while the CIA homogenizes his brain with a fruitcake cocktail for years. Then, when needed, (and recovered enough) they put him back in the embassy. He’s so messed up he really did smear poop on the walls, but not for more than a small time back, to stage the arrest, and Ecuador in exchange for going along with it for all this time, gets the 4+ billion payoff.If it is Assange and not a body double, this has to have been what happened, I was online posting during the live stream and said that night he was gone right when he was taken, plus said the next day he was gone and then his internet was “gone” and that was not a coincidence. The media at the time stated openly Pamela hated him and they were wondering why she’d buy him lunch. Then the “love story” kicked off and I called B.S. the entire time. Now he’s a clearly screwed up dude, whacked out of his mind when all the previous years did not make him whacked out of his mind. What happened during the last two and a half? NO BALCONY APPEARANCE, NOT EVEN A CAMEO? I know I am right about this, but feel it will be impossible to overcome the official lie this time. I think it was Assange in the photos, and they screwed him up GOOD. The Wikileaks saga is over. All we got was regurgitated crap in the “life insurance” release. This time, the deep state won.
Assange does not look right in the police van. SEE THIS. Compare photos.He aged too much, and his base persona is very different from photos, even “recent” 2016 photos. It is either not the same guy, or something horrible happened to him that tweaked his brain to a different world. Like lots of shock therapy or really bad psych drugs.
Boeing has officially stated that the 737 MAX is not fit to ever take off from an airport that is more than a mile in altitude. That’s ridiculous, considering the 707 of the late 1950’s was fit to take off from La Paz Bolivia’s airport, at 13, 000+ feet. Clearly, there’s common core crap going on at Boeing now.
DUE TO NEW INFO, THE FOLLOWING HAS CHANGED:My current take on Wikileaks and Assange (this has changed HUGELY) there’s really nothing in support of the current events being real1.After going over the photos of Assange more closely, it looks like his base persona changed too much and that drugs or other “treatment” had to have caused it. So #1 is now a negative, and I believe they want photos of him out of the news cycle ASAP.2. The media smear campaign may be accurate, Assange may have smeared poop on the walls after getting his brain erased, so #2 is now a negative.3. The payoff of 4.3 billion to Ecuador is actually a negative, they probably received that for keeping their mouths shut about Assange.4. Supposedly a total wiki dump was done But a close look at what was dumped now confirms there’s nothing new, it is all a PILE OF CRAP. #4 is now a huge red flag NEGATIVE.5. Anonymous cyber attacked the HELL out of Ecuador. That did not change from a positive to a negative, however, Anonymous is like you and me, they are just people who can be fooled. So they’d attack.Now the original – What hurts the legitimacy of the event:1. The total “wiki dump” where everything was dumped appears to be a compliation of previous dumps, and contained far too many things I already have and have posted, even without Wikileaks. That’s a big problem. I predict ZERO items of relevance will be found that we don’t already know., but it looked good for politics, The entire dump is here. Granted, I did not go through it all, but I have seen tons of what is on that list before. This is not what I would expect from the legit Wikileaks. Maybe someone will find something but I have heard NADA and first glance was not one of good impression.2. As I stated before, none of the original top people on the Wikileaks staff are still around, the three top players got killed off in 2016 and then there was the anomaly with Assange, where his “internet got cut” for an ENORMOUS time span, right in the middle of it all, and he never once afterward showed up on the balcony, which he had TOTAL access to, the embassy gave him that room so there’s no explanation for why he did not ever show up there.3. Deep fakes are absolutely real, and what has happened with the Gettysburg Address proves faking Assange would be a cakewalk. Add to this the fact that someone live streamed Assange being removed the day before his internet got cut, purportedly for medical reasons after he got poisoned, and things look really sketchy.4. All of the original police van arrest photos were taken by RT staff. How did they get a monopoly on this? For HOURS, RT was the only one with the story, until others started referencing RT. Why? Because if it was done by deep fake, there would only be one source. The source the most people trusted was chosen.5. When I went to post about the problems with the Assange story, someone was actually audacious enough to highlight everything I typed in blue right in front of me, and delete it. When that happened, It was obvious someone did not want it stated and placed in a prominent location. I don’t know how they expected me to just suck it up and not re-write it all, but they at least tried. And that speaks volumes.I am skeptical it was assange and not a deep fake, but am also skeptical of it being a deep fake rather than Assange. I really do not know what to think. If we don’t see actual video of Assange soon, that alone will speak volumes, why would there be none, even from the court?Granted, the Gettysburg Address “Mandela” fakery compliments of the tech left is not helping things either. It has nothing to do with Wikileaks directly, but does clearly show that extremely convincing and downright audacious fakery can and will be done.Perhaps the real issue with my doubting all of this originates from a proven scamming press that can’t be trusted to tell the truth with anything at all, and instead repeatedly produces fake after fake after fake. Given the background of what went on with Assange, a fair degree of skepticism is certainly in order. I am going to have to sit this one out and watch for screw ups.My current take on Wikileaks and AssangePros (for ithe current events being legit:)1. Assange looked absolutely real, and exactly how I’d expect him to look if he was holed up out of sight for almost 3 years.2. The media smear campaign boosted the credibility of this event a lot.3. The payoff of 4.3 billion to Ecuador.4. Supposedly a total wiki dump was done.5. Anonymous cyber attacked the HELL out of Ecuador.What hurts the legitimacy of the event:1. The total “wiki dump” where everything was dumped appears to be a compliation of previous dumps, and contained far too many things I already have and have posted, even without Wikileaks. That’s a big problem. I predict ZERO items of relevance will be found that we don’t already know., but it looked good for politics, The entire dump is here. Granted, I did not go through it all, but I have seen tons of what is on that list before. This is not what I would expect from the legit Wikileaks. Maybe someone will find something but I have heard NADA and first glance was not one of good impression.2. As I stated before, none of the original top people on the Wikileaks staff are still around, the three top players got killed off in 2016 and then there was the anomaly with Assange, where his “internet got cut” for an ENORMOUS time span, right in the middle of it all, and he never once afterward showed up on the balcony, which he had TOTAL access to, the embassy gave him that room so there’s no explanation for why he did not ever show up there.3. Deep fakes are absolutely real, and what has happened with the Gettysburg Address proves faking Assange would be a cakewalk. Add to this the fact that someone live streamed Assange being removed the day before his internet got cut, purportedly for medical reasons after he got poisoned, and things look really sketchy.4. All of the original police van arrest photos were taken by RT staff. How did they get a monopoly on this? For HOURS, RT was the only one with the story, until others started referencing RT. Why? Because if it was done by deep fake, there would only be one source. The source the most people trusted was chosen.5. When I went to post about the problems with the Assange story, someone was actually audacious enough to highlight everything I typed in blue right in front of me, and delete it. When that happened, It was obvious someone did not want it stated and placed in a prominent location. I don’t know how they expected me to just suck it up and not re-write it all, but they at least tried. And that speaks volumes.I am skeptical it was assange and not a deep fake, but am also skeptical of it being a deep fake rather than Assange. I really do not know what to think. If we don’t see actual video of Assange soon, that alone will speak volumes, why would there be none, even from the court?Granted, the Gettysburg Address “Mandela” fakery compliments of the tech left is not helping things either. It has nothing to do with Wikileaks directly, but does clearly show that extremely convincing and downright audacious fakery can and will be done.Perhaps the real issue with my doubting all of this originates from a proven scamming press that can’t be trusted to tell the truth with anything at all, and instead repeatedly produces fake after fake after fake. Given the background of what went on with Assange, a fair degree of skepticism is certainly in order. I am going to have to sit this one out and watch for screw ups.
Trump doubled down on sending illegal immigrants exclusively to sanctuary citiesThis is a great idea, and he’s repeating that it will be done. SEE THIS.To be clear, (because I noticed people are not understanding this in forums and blogs -Wikileaks did not expose that the Gettysburg address was changed. The point I am making is that the deep fakes are so real, the tech left changed the Gettysburg Address and it was done in a very convincing way. If they can be that convincing with a historic document, where even old photos have had the text changed, there’s no question they can totally fake Assange now, especially if they are audacious enough to mess with such a well known historic document.They were not complete in their purge of the Gettysburg Address, Johnny Cash preserved the original and you can damn well bet he did not get it wrong.
UPDATE TO BELOW:I discussed the topic of the Gettysburg address being changed with Claudia and how the revisionists were first noticed when they claimed Nelson Mandela was still alive (after everyone knew he died in prison) and as it turns out, Mexicans all know he died in prison long long ago and this hoax “Mandela effect” never happened in Mexico. It appears that it is all a stunt the tech left is pulling to re-write the history of Western civilization, even despite it all remaining intact in countries like Mexico. Claudia said they would never get away with it in Mexico because the old books are kept by everyone and not thrown away. I am not so sure this will work for them long term, but for now, the “Mandela effect” is not happening in Mexico, at least not as much.FOLKS, THE SCAMMING TECH LEFT HAS CHANGED THE GETTYSBURG ADDRESS. It is now Four score and seven years ago our fathers! The tech left has replaced “forefathers” with “fathers” and have obviously employed supercomputers to comb every record everyone has and change it to fathers, including photos people have, even private personal photos. There is now NO QUESTION AT ALL that’s what operating system updates are really doing, they are going into everyone’s photos and documents and changing what is there to match the new narrative, whatever it happens to be. If this is hard for you to believe, go check the Gettysburg Address on all sites that claim to be for “history”, even the photos, and see for yourself.There’s no other way this historic document could have been purged so well, and so completely, and the quality of the hoaxing of photos is so high there’s now reason to believe Julian Assange is in fact dead and they are hoaxing even him.It might be hard to believe you did not remember the Gettysburg Address wrong after bathing in 500 photos “proving” you remembered it wrong but I found proof you did not remember it wrong. As it turns out, Johnny Cash put it to music. Since the revisionist AI was not set to hunt out music and destroy even that, it stayed preserved via Johnny Cash.Their revisionist AI made a fatal screw up and I found it there. It can be assumed that the AI will change that Johnny Cash tune as soon as the tech left figures out it was preserved there, but I checked again this morning and it was still legit and also saved it. It is evident now that saving it on a computer will not be good enough however, the AI will find it’s way in and wipe it out. This is obviously what all those huge supercomputers are at least in part, really for.If you still have those old encyclopedias, or there is a set you can go get, DO IT, AND GUARD IT WITH YOUR LIFE. Believe nothing, the tech left is clearly hell bent on destroying true history. 
End of Wikileaks timelineOctober 23 2016 – Wikileaks director Gavey Macfadyen dead.
April 16, 2016 – Wikileaks lawyer John Jones dead (“jumped in front of train”) (suicide)
May 11 2016 – Wikileaks Chief Counsel Michael Ratner dead. 
October 16 2016 – Pamela brings Assange “lunch”, claims he was not feeling well after eating it, and on October 17 Assange had his “internet cut”.At an unknown date, suddenly the Gettysburg Address was re-written to “four score and seven years ago, our FATHERS set forth . . . . instead of forefathers, including perfectly re-written photos confirming that’s what the text always was. Yes folks, the deep fake is for real.And then Assange makes his mystery miracle appearance, after being totally unseen since Pamela brought him lunch. YEAH RIGHT.I was going along with the Assange story until I found out what happened with the Gettysburg Address, and how convincing it is. Fortunately I was able to bust it, scroll down to that report. It proves they really could totally fake Assange, and I am more skeptical than ever now.Israeli moon probe update:The photo from the Israeli spacecraft I posted yesterday was posted by Fox News Approximately a day later. As it turns out, it was taken by the craft before it crashed despite it looking like it was taken from the ground. I am still skeptical and don’t fully believe it crashed or that the photo really was taken from miles above the moon as claimed, it does not look right for that (too much ground detail).
I am now convinced Assange is not in court, and the embassy did not kick him out this week (he has not been there for years)Here is why. I can prove they probably faked the Assange photos with a simple image search of the Gettysburg Address. GET A LOAD OF THIS: They back wiped all the digital copies of photos, probably even via windows updates for those who had them, and the Gettysburg Address now, even in the photos, says FATHERS, not forefathers. Yet the AI missed references to the Gettysburg address in Johnny Cash tunes, computer programming forums, and English structure web sites. It purged only the places that claimed to record history and forgot music, other forms of education, and off topic blogs that happened to reference it. The AI actually over wrote ALL PHOTO REFERENCES and re-arranged the text in all photos perfectly. If this happened, software can do anything now, and can do it in bulk, automatically. See this. No matter how the photo appears or what font it is in, it has been perfectly corrected to replace “forefathers” with “fathers”. Yet this Johnny Cash tune still has forefathers, and you can “take it to the bank” that Johnny Cash did not screw this up. The proper reference he provided was overlooked because music was not in the genre the AI was set to hunt out.It has become obvious that what is happening now is that revisionists, who want to destroy history, have started using massively powerful artificial intelligence to back write everything digital, including even photos and locations of historic reference, provided they are in digital form. There is probably no “Mandela effect” per se, instead there likely are revisionists using advanced AI to back write everything and erase reality from the internet. This time they screwed up and only re-wrote direct historic reference that claimed to be historic reference and missed music. I’ll believe Johnny Cash long before I’ll trust a Google linked history site (or any site or photo any search engine pulls up nowadays.) We are obviously in the middle of a war, and the tech left is doing all it can to erase who we are in this war.Due to the fact that the fakes of all the documents and photos of the Gettysburg address are totally convincing, no matter what font, paper, material, camera angle – you name it – I am going to call it like I suspected all along. Assange is yet another one of these fakes, if the AI could fake all those photos so well, in addition to finding them, hacking the computer they were on and replacing them with something that looks perfect, there’s no reason at all to believe we got the truth with Assange over the past couple days. Pamela is faking a love affair after bringing him “lunch” in 2016, the base reality of it all is now written in the Gettysburg Address, PERIOD.Trump: Put illegals in sanctuary cities. Pelosi: Trump’s Sanctuary City Proposal Is ‘Unworthy of the Presidency of the United States’Oh really Nancy? Where else are they going to go if you keep using the 9th circuit to stifle Trump’s every move? WHERE THE HELL ELSE IS A BETTER PLACE NANCY??!!??When I said “they highlighted and deleted” the latest Assange report, I mean, to be clear, right in front of me on the screen it highlighted and deleted by itself and I had to re-write it.Therefore it is probably BANG ON.
GOOGLE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING A NEW “MANDELA EFFECT” REWRITE!I BUSTED THIS IN PROGRESS. Other people were not able to bust it and are lamenting how “history changed all the way back to the beginning of time”. History did not change, this is just revisionists messing with us and I found proof.It is with the Gettysburg address. The phrase “Four score and seven years ago, our forefathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” is now being changed to “Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.Ok, so search this on Google. Just type “four score and seven years ago”. Every reference, even the supposedly historic references has forefathers changed over to just fathers. But at This link which is only an English test and therefore not a historic reference (so the AI skipped it) the original quote is there. BUSTED. No English test is going to get that quote wrong but it was under the topic English, and not history, so the AI missed it. The GOOGLE Mandela AI has been busted.
I am having problems with hacks again today, which is why the following two reports repeat 3 times.THEY HIGHLIGHTED AND DELETED THE FOLLOWING, I PROBABLY NAILED ITThis is the first time this ever happened in “combat mode”I will try to re-type this as well as possible.They are trying to erase Assange with slander, to prevent people from looking into just how suspicious the current story is.The smear campaign against Assange is not plausible AT ALL.According to the MSM now, Assange was a poop smearing psychopathic A-hole that everyone hated at the embassy.This story does not wash at all, here’s why:1. Assange had, at the back of the embassy, the largest and most secure room there, where the Wikileaks office was based. Only he had the key codes to that room, they gave him his privacy. 2. In addition to that room, they gave him another good one, that only he had the key codes to. It was probably his bedroom. 3. In addition to that room, he had the balcony room ALL TO HIMSELF, it was by far the best room at the embassy, and it was all his, only he had the key code to it. In addition to this, he got half the kitchen. Folks, if they hated him, they would not have given him totally secure key codes to all that, with only him having access.Now we are getting via the MSM that he was hated, a psychopath, the LAST GUY YOU WOULD EVER WANT TO MEET. I call BULLSHIT. If this was true, we’d have heard about it years ago, right after he turned up at the embassy. Instead, he was a really cool guy who made great appearances via live stream plus great balcony appearances. There was never any indication at all that there was anything at all amiss. And the way the embassy behaved, by giving him so much, proves he could not possibly have been hated. He was ONE OF US.There’s lots wrong with the current story about Assange, which I cover in the next post. And I will say this: In the current photos, Assange looked nuts, like he was locked away in an interrogation room with no means of hygene for the last 3 years, ever since that van pulled up and removed him in 2016. Assange NEVER LOOKED LIKE THAT, why did his appearances go to hell so badly? He looked sharp before. Why no public appearances and a sudden change to nut case goon? What we got when he was finally “officially” removed is what you’d expect if he was not there the whole time, for the past 2+ years, and they dumped him there with a huge payoff so this current story could be fronted. Though the details of this probably won’t ever be known, one thing is certain: Assange was NOT a poop smearing totally hated hard to get along with nutcase. He was in fact quite cool, and the stories about him being some sort of rapist are admitted hoaxes and are exactly the same sort of stories we got with someone else the deep state hated – PRESIDENT TRUMP.They want Assange destroyed so no one looks into how odd the current story line is.They want you to just accept how only one media source got the photos (which is how it would be with deep fakes or an absolutely controlled and locked down event) and not question anything because “Assange was hated at the embassy anyway and a TOTAL JERK.” Anyone who followed the Wikileaks saga at all knows what is currently being spewed now can’t possibly be true, but if the scamming MSM, especially the British MSM can plant enough of a seed of doubt about the character of Assange to prevent people from looking into how odd this current story is, that will do, and if they can they will just sweep him under the rug and be done with it ASAP.Assange went from “cool” to the monster of Beowulf in ONE sequential photo. How the hell did that happen?That is pretty much what I said the first time I typed it, only to have it subsequently wiped out. Why would they wipe it out? YOU GUESS.
I figured out the problem with the Assange storyIt all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT is not entirely credible. RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. They sure ought to. So that alone shows that RT can’t possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why (at least in the beginning) there was only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a “never Trumper” now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen – ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he’s all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let’s get back to “never Trump -How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished from sight for almost 3 years and then the first time he actually appeared in a photo he emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He’ll be extradited to the U.S. and then he’ll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she’s his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too. I am suspicious of it all to say the least.This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016, it happened at 3 AM British time) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?
Israeli moon probe update:The photo from the Israeli spacecraft I posted yesterday was posted by Fox News Approximately a day later. As it turns out, it was taken by the craft before it crashed despite it looking like it was taken from the ground. I am still skeptical and don’t fully believe it crashed or that the photo really was taken from miles above the moon as claimed, it does not look right for that (too much ground detail).
I am now convinced Assange is not in court, and the embassy did not kick him out this week (he has not been there for years)Here is why. I can prove they probably faked the Assange photos with a simple image search of the Gettysburg Address. GET A LOAD OF THIS: They back wiped all the digital copies of photos, probably even via windows updates for those who had them, and the Gettysburg Address now, even in the photos, says FATHERS, not forefathers. Yet the AI missed references to the Gettysburg address in Johnny Cash tunes, computer programming forums, and English structure web sites. It purged only the places that claimed to record history and forgot music, other forms of education, and off topic blogs that happened to reference it. The AI actually over wrote ALL PHOTO REFERENCES and re-arranged the text in all photos perfectly. If this happened, software can do anything now, and can do it in bulk, automatically. See this. No matter how the photo appears or what font it is in, it has been perfectly corrected to replace “forefathers” with “fathers”. Yet this Johnny Cash tune still has forefathers, and you can “take it to the bank” that Johnny Cash did not screw this up. The proper reference he provided was overlooked because music was not in the genre the AI was set to hunt out.It has become obvious that what is happening now is that revisionists, who want to destroy history, have started using massively powerful artificial intelligence to back write everything digital, including even photos and locations of historic reference, provided they are in digital form. There is probably no “Mandela effect” per se, instead there likely are revisionists using advanced AI to back write everything and erase reality from the internet. This time they screwed up and only re-wrote direct historic reference that claimed to be historic reference and missed music. I’ll believe Johnny Cash long before I’ll trust a Google linked history site (or any site or photo any search engine pulls up nowadays.) We are obviously in the middle of a war, and the tech left is doing all it can to erase who we are in this war.Due to the fact that the fakes of all the documents and photos of the Gettysburg address are totally convincing, no matter what font, paper, material, camera angle – you name it – I am going to call it like I suspected all along. Assange is yet another one of these fakes, if the AI could fake all those photos so well, in addition to finding them, hacking the computer they were on and replacing them with something that looks perfect, there’s no reason at all to believe we got the truth with Assange over the past couple days. Pamela is faking a love affair after bringing him “lunch” in 2016, the base reality of it all is now written in the Gettysburg Address, PERIOD.Trump: Put illegals in sanctuary cities. Pelosi: Trump’s Sanctuary City Proposal Is ‘Unworthy of the Presidency of the United States’Oh really Nancy? Where else are they going to go if you keep using the 9th circuit to stifle Trump’s every move? WHERE THE HELL ELSE IS A BETTER PLACE NANCY??!!??When I said “they highlighted and deleted” the latest Assange report, I mean, to be clear, right in front of me on the screen it highlighted and deleted by itself and I had to re-write it.Therefore it is probably BANG ON.
GOOGLE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING A NEW “MANDELA EFFECT” REWRITE!I BUSTED THIS IN PROGRESS. Other people were not able to bust it and are lamenting how “history changed all the way back to the beginning of time”. History did not change, this is just revisionists messing with us and I found proof.It is with the Gettysburg address. The phrase “Four score and seven years ago, our forefathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” is now being changed to “Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.Ok, so search this on Google. Just type “four score and seven years ago”. Every reference, even the supposedly historic references has forefathers changed over to just fathers. But at This link which is only an English test and therefore not a historic reference (so the AI skipped it) the original quote is there. BUSTED. No English test is going to get that quote wrong but it was under the topic English, and not history, so the AI missed it. The GOOGLE Mandela AI has been busted.
I am having problems with hacks again today, which is why the following two reports repeat 3 times.THEY HIGHLIGHTED AND DELETED THE FOLLOWING, I PROBABLY NAILED ITThis is the first time this ever happened in “combat mode”I will try to re-type this as well as possible.They are trying to erase Assange with slander, to prevent people from looking into just how suspicious the current story is.The smear campaign against Assange is not plausible AT ALL.According to the MSM now, Assange was a poop smearing psychopathic A-hole that everyone hated at the embassy.This story does not wash at all, here’s why:1. Assange had, at the back of the embassy, the largest and most secure room there, where the Wikileaks office was based. Only he had the key codes to that room, they gave him his privacy. 2. In addition to that room, they gave him another good one, that only he had the key codes to. It was probably his bedroom. 3. In addition to that room, he had the balcony room ALL TO HIMSELF, it was by far the best room at the embassy, and it was all his, only he had the key code to it. In addition to this, he got half the kitchen. Folks, if they hated him, they would not have given him totally secure key codes to all that, with only him having access.Now we are getting via the MSM that he was hated, a psychopath, the LAST GUY YOU WOULD EVER WANT TO MEET. I call BULLSHIT. If this was true, we’d have heard about it years ago, right after he turned up at the embassy. Instead, he was a really cool guy who made great appearances via live stream plus great balcony appearances. There was never any indication at all that there was anything at all amiss. And the way the embassy behaved, by giving him so much, proves he could not possibly have been hated. He was ONE OF US.There’s lots wrong with the current story about Assange, which I cover in the next post. And I will say this: In the current photos, Assange looked nuts, like he was locked away in an interrogation room with no means of hygene for the last 3 years, ever since that van pulled up and removed him in 2016. Assange NEVER LOOKED LIKE THAT, why did his appearances go to hell so badly? He looked sharp before. Why no public appearances and a sudden change to nut case goon? What we got when he was finally “officially” removed is what you’d expect if he was not there the whole time, for the past 2+ years, and they dumped him there with a huge payoff so this current story could be fronted. Though the details of this probably won’t ever be known, one thing is certain: Assange was NOT a poop smearing totally hated hard to get along with nutcase. He was in fact quite cool, and the stories about him being some sort of rapist are admitted hoaxes and are exactly the same sort of stories we got with someone else the deep state hated – PRESIDENT TRUMP.They want Assange destroyed so no one looks into how odd the current story line is.They want you to just accept how only one media source got the photos (which is how it would be with deep fakes or an absolutely controlled and locked down event) and not question anything because “Assange was hated at the embassy anyway and a TOTAL JERK.” Anyone who followed the Wikileaks saga at all knows what is currently being spewed now can’t possibly be true, but if the scamming MSM, especially the British MSM can plant enough of a seed of doubt about the character of Assange to prevent people from looking into how odd this current story is, that will do, and if they can they will just sweep him under the rug and be done with it ASAP.Assange went from “cool” to the monster of Beowulf in ONE sequential photo. How the hell did that happen?That is pretty much what I said the first time I typed it, only to have it subsequently wiped out. Why would they wipe it out? YOU GUESS.
I figured out the problem with the Assange storyIt all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT is not entirely credible. RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. They sure ought to. So that alone shows that RT can’t possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why (at least in the beginning) there was only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a “never Trumper” now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen – ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he’s all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let’s get back to “never Trump -How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished from sight for almost 3 years and then the first time he actually appeared in a photo he emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He’ll be extradited to the U.S. and then he’ll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she’s his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too. I am suspicious of it all to say the least.This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016, it happened at 3 AM British time) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?The following is a re-post of the above. Scroll past it for yesterday’s stuff. I am getting messed with badly today. I did not make the following error, which headlined the entire report above. I will have to log in to fix this.GOOGLE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING A NEW “MANDELA EFFECT” REWRITE!HA HA, I BUSTED THIS IN PROGRESS.It is with the Gettysburg address. The phrase “Four score and seven years ago, our forefathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” is now being changed to “Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.Ok, so search this on Google. Just type “four score and seven years ago”. Every reference, even the supposedly historic references has forefathers changed over to just fathers. But at This link which is only an English test and therefore not a historic reference (so the AI skipped it) the original quote is there. BUSTED. No English test is going to get that quote wrong but it was under the topic English, and not history, so the AI missed it. The GOOGLE Mandela AI has been busted.
I am having problems with hacks again today, which is why the following two reports repeat 3 times.THEY HIGHLIGHTED AND DELETED THE FOLLOWING, I PROBABLY NAILED ITThis is the first time this ever happened in “combat mode”I will try to re-type this as well as possible.They are trying to erase Assange with slander, to prevent people from looking into just how suspicious the current story is.The smear campaign against Assange is not plausible AT ALL.According to the MSM now, Assange was a poop smearing psychopathic A-hole that everyone hated at the embassy.This story does not wash at all, here’s why:1. Assange had, at the back of the embassy, the largest and most secure room there, where the Wikileaks office was based. Only he had the key codes to that room, they gave him his privacy. 2. In addition to that room, they gave him another good one, that only he had the key codes to. It was probably his bedroom. 3. In addition to that room, he had the balcony room ALL TO HIMSELF, it was by far the best room at the embassy, and it was all his, only he had the key code to it. In addition to this, he got half the kitchen. Folks, if they hated him, they would not have given him totally secure key codes to all that, with only him having access.Now we are getting via the MSM that he was hated, a psychopath, the LAST GUY YOU WOULD EVER WANT TO MEET. I call BULLSHIT. If this was true, we’d have heard about it years ago, right after he turned up at the embassy. Instead, he was a really cool guy who made great appearances via live stream plus great balcony appearances. There was never any indication at all that there was anything at all amiss. And the way the embassy behaved, by giving him so much, proves he could not possibly have been hated. He was ONE OF US.There’s lots wrong with the current story about Assange, which I cover in the next post. And I will say this: In the current photos, Assange looked nuts, like he was locked away in an interrogation room with no means of hygene for the last 3 years, ever since that van pulled up and removed him in 2016. Assange NEVER LOOKED LIKE THAT, why did his appearances go to hell so badly? He looked sharp before. Why no public appearances and a sudden change to nut case goon? What we got when he was finally “officially” removed is what you’d expect if he was not there the whole time, for the past 2+ years, and they dumped him there with a huge payoff so this current story could be fronted. Though the details of this probably won’t ever be known, one thing is certain: Assange was NOT a poop smearing totally hated hard to get along with nutcase. He was in fact quite cool, and the stories about him being some sort of rapist are admitted hoaxes and are exactly the same sort of stories we got with someone else the deep state hated – PRESIDENT TRUMP.They want Assange destroyed so no one looks into how odd the current story line is.They want you to just accept how only one media source got the photos (which is how it would be with deep fakes or an absolutely controlled and locked down event) and not question anything because “Assange was hated at the embassy anyway and a TOTAL JERK.” Anyone who followed the Wikileaks saga at all knows what is currently being spewed now can’t possibly be true, but if the scamming MSM, especially the British MSM can plant enough of a seed of doubt about the character of Assange to prevent people from looking into how odd this current story is, that will do, and if they can they will just sweep him under the rug and be done with it ASAP.Assange went from “cool” to the monster of Beowulf in ONE sequential photo. How the hell did that happen?That is pretty much what I said the first time I typed it, only to have it subsequently wiped out. Why would they wipe it out? YOU GUESS.
I figured out the problem with the Assange storyIt all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT is not entirely credible. RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. They sure ought to. So that alone shows that RT can’t possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why (at least in the beginning) there was only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a “never Trumper” now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen – ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he’s all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let’s get back to “never Trump -How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished from sight for almost 3 years and then the first time he actually appeared in a photo he emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He’ll be extradited to the U.S. and then he’ll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she’s his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too. I am suspicious of it all to say the least.This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016, it happened at 3 AM British time) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?The following is a re-post of the above. Scroll past it for yesterday’s stuff. THEY HIGHLIGHTED AND DELETED THE FOLLOWING, I PROBABLY NAILED ITThis is the first time this ever happened in “combat mode”I will try to re-type this as well as possible.They are trying to erase Assange with slander, to prevent people from looking into just how suspicious the current story is.The smear campaign against Assange is not plausible AT ALL.According to the MSM now, Assange was a poop smearing psychopathic A-hole that everyone hated at the embassy.This story does not wash at all, here’s why:1. Assange had, at the back of the embassy, the largest and most secure room there, where the Wikileaks office was based. Only he had the key codes to that room, they gave him his privacy. 2. In addition to that room, they gave him another good one, that only he had the key codes to. It was probably his bedroom. 3. In addition to that room, he had the balcony room ALL TO HIMSELF, it was by far the best room at the embassy, and it was all his, only he had the key code to it. In addition to this, he got half the kitchen. Folks, if they hated him, they would not have given him totally secure key codes to all that, with only him having access.Now we are getting via the MSM that he was hated, a psychopath, the LAST GUY YOU WOULD EVER WANT TO MEET. I call BULLSHIT. If this was true, we’d have heard about it years ago, right after he turned up at the embassy. Instead, he was a really cool guy who made great appearances via live stream plus great balcony appearances. There was never any indication at all that there was anything at all amiss. And the way the embassy behaved, by giving him so much, proves he could not possibly have been hated. He was ONE OF US.There’s lots wrong with the current story about Assange, which I cover in the next post. And I will say this: In the current photos, Assange looked nuts, like he was locked away in an interrogation room with no means of hygene for the last 3 years, ever since that van pulled up and removed him in 2016. Assange NEVER LOOKED LIKE THAT, why did his appearances go to hell so badly? He looked sharp before. Why no public appearances and a sudden change to nut case goon? What we got when he was finally “officially” removed is what you’d expect if he was not there the whole time, for the past 2+ years, and they dumped him there with a huge payoff so this current story could be fronted. Though the details of this probably won’t ever be known, one thing is certain: Assange was NOT a poop smearing totally hated hard to get along with nutcase. He was in fact quite cool, and the stories about him being some sort of rapist are admitted hoaxes and are exactly the same sort of stories we got with someone else the deep state hated – PRESIDENT TRUMP.They want Assange destroyed so no one looks into how odd the current story line is.They want you to just accept how only one media source got the photos (which is how it would be with deep fakes or an absolutely controlled and locked down event) and not question anything because “Assange was hated at the embassy anyway and a TOTAL JERK.” Anyone who followed the Wikileaks saga at all knows what is currently being spewed now can’t possibly be true, but if the scamming MSM, especially the British MSM can plant enough of a seed of doubt about the character of Assange to prevent people from looking into how odd this current story is, that will do, and if they can they will just sweep him under the rug and be done with it ASAP.Assange went from “cool” to the monster of Beowulf in ONE sequential photo. How the hell did that happen?That is pretty much what I said the first time I typed it, only to have it subsequently wiped out. Why would they wipe it out? YOU GUESS.
I figured out the problem with the Assange storyIt all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT is not entirely credible. RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. They sure ought to. So that alone shows that RT can’t possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why (at least in the beginning) there was only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a “never Trumper” now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen – ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he’s all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let’s get back to “never Trump -How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished from sight for almost 3 years and then the first time he actually appeared in a photo he emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He’ll be extradited to the U.S. and then he’ll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she’s his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too. I am suspicious of it all to say the least.This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016, it happened at 3 AM British time) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?The following is a re-post of the above. Scroll past it for yesterday’s stuff. THEY HIGHLIGHTED AND DELETED THE FOLLOWING, I PROBABLY NAILED ITThis is the first time this ever happened in “combat mode”I will try to re-type this as well as possible.They are trying to erase Assange with slander, to prevent people from looking into just how suspicious the current story is.The smear campaign against Assange is not plausible AT ALL.According to the MSM now, Assange was a poop smearing psychopathic A-hole that everyone hated at the embassy. This story does not wash at all, here’s why:1. Assange had, at the back of the embassy, the largest and most secure room there, where the Wikileaks office was based. Only he had the key codes to that room, they gave him his privacy. 2. In addition to that room, they gave him another good one, that only he had the key codes to. It was probably his bedroom. 3. In addition to that room, he had the balcony room ALL TO HIMSELF, it was by far the best room at the embassy, and it was all his, only he had the key code to it. In addition to this, he got half the kitchen. Folks, if they hated him, they would not have given him totally secure key codes to all that, with only him having access.Now we are getting via the MSM that he was hated, a psychopath, the LAST GUY YOU WOULD EVER WANT TO MEET. I call BULLSHIT. If this was true, we’d have heard about it years ago, right after he turned up at the embassy. Instead, he was a really cool guy who made great appearances via live stream plus great balcony appearances. There was never any indication at all that there was anything at all amiss. And the way the embassy behaved, by giving him so much, proves he could not possibly have been hated. He was ONE OF US.There’s lots wrong with the current story about Assange, which I cover in the next post. And I will say this: In the current photos, Assange looked nuts, like he was locked away in an interrogation room with no means of hygene for the last 3 years, ever since that van pulled up and removed him in 2016. Assange NEVER LOOKED LIKE THAT, why did his appearances go to hell so badly? He looked sharp before. Why no public appearances and a sudden change to nut case goon? What we got when he was finally “officially” removed is what you’d expect if he was not there the whole time, for the past 2+ years, and they dumped him there with a huge payoff so this current story could be fronted. Though the details of this probably won’t ever be known, one thing is certain: Assange was NOT a poop smearing totally hated hard to get along with nutcase. He was in fact quite cool, and the stories about him being some sort of rapist are admitted hoaxes and are exactly the same sort of stories we got with someone else the deep state hated – PRESIDENT TRUMP.They want Assange destroyed so no one looks into how odd the current story line is.They want you to just accept how only one media source got the photos (which is how it would be with deep fakes or an absolutely controlled and locked down event) and not question anything because “Assange was hated at the embassy anyway and a TOTAL JERK.” Anyone who followed the Wikileaks saga at all knows what is currently being spewed now can’t possibly be true, but if the scamming MSM, especially the British MSM can plant enough of a seed of doubt about the character of Assange to prevent people from looking into how odd this current story is, that will do, and if they can they will just sweep him under the rug and be done with it ASAP.Assange went from “cool” to the monster of Beowulf in ONE sequential photo. How the hell did that happen?That is pretty much what I said the first time I typed it, only to have it subsequently wiped out. Why would they wipe it out? YOU GUESS.
I figured out the problem with the Assange storyIt all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT is not entirely credible. RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. They sure ought to. So that alone shows that RT can’t possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why (at least in the beginning) there was only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a “never Trumper” now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen – ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he’s all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let’s get back to “never Trump -How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished from sight for almost 3 years and then the first time he actually appeared in a photo he emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He’ll be extradited to the U.S. and then he’ll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she’s his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too. I am suspicious of it all to say the least.This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016, it happened at 3 AM British time) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?The following is a re-post of the above. Scroll past it for yesterday’s stuff.I figured out the problem with the Assange storyIt all boils down to this: RT was the ONLY ONE with the story. All other media outlets copied RT and used photos from RT. All the way to the end of the police car ride. How was it that RT was the only one with the scoop? One would expect the media to pounce on this even if it was kept private but they did not, despite having a time frame of at least an hour to do it in. They can have reporters on scene faster than that. Why would they not have reporters there? ANSWER: Because if you are going to do a deep fake, you do it with ONE SOURCE.Why would RT be used? Because the rest of the MSM is perceived as such a lying dirt bag that only RT would have the credibility to pull it off. Problem: RT appears to be pro-Trump yet Trump has given Russia more problems than anyone. Why would RT be pro Trump? Because they know Trump is a very popular president, and they want to remain popular with their target audience even though they may well hate Trump more than anyone. So that alone shows that RT can’t possibly be totally on the up and up, they may be a new world order mouthpiece more than anyone, hiding in the shadows of a former communist state that no one can deny was the one that got the ball rolling to turn the U.S. into what it is becoming now. I never trusted Russia.At any rate, the photos all look real. But the question remains as to why there is only one source. And let me make a bet: Assange is going to turn on Trump. How is Assange a “never Trumper” now? When was that ever a meme? It is as if the controllers of the story line just slipped that in there, expecting people to buy it as part of the shock of Assange suddenly being out of the embassy (which was not supposed to happen – ) remember that just the day before the president of Ecuador back talked the MSM and said the stories about Assanges eviction were false and we are supposed to believe the next day he’s all for it? There are lots of conflicts here, let’s get back to “never Trump –How is it that Assange, who supposedly worked to get Trump elected, vanished for almost 3 years and then emerged a never trumper? That kind of flip does not happen. I am not going to continue with the line that Assange is dead, but I will still state that I am highly suspicious of what is going on now and that it is beyond known that such deep fakes are now possible. This story is NOT ADDING UP. Wait. Let me guess. He’ll be extradited to the U.S. and then he’ll unveil the magic bullet that takes Trump out.And the Pamela ruse is SICKENING. She hated Assange in 2016 and now she’s his lover? Question: Look at Assange and look at Pamela. Would she go for that? DOUBT IT. I guess it is too good of a story line to let die, especially now that Assange is a re-born never Trumper and Pamela wants Trump gone too.I am suspicious of it all to say the least.This is going to be a real show to watch. Maybe Assange is alive, was removed from the embassy (I saw that happen on live stream in 2016) and then got put back in for this show, with Ecuador playing along in exchange for a payoff, (I think it was 4.3 billion) that just happened yesterday. Coincidence? TOO MUCH BULLSHIT GOING ON. That payoff would not explain why it was Russia and no one else that mysteriously got the scoop. ONLY RT WAS THERE. Why?
Assange rumorsThere are so many rumors about what it means and what will happen that I am not going to entertain any of them. All I can say is that I am very surprised by the latest developments, and have some degree of skepticism. It does indeed look like he is alive and well however.
The SpaceX launch was successful, and all 3 boosters returned successfully.Probable high profit mission.
This Six minute video of the flooding in America’s grain belt is well worth watching.
HERE IS AN INTERESTING ONE: Israel’s probe may not have crashedRumor has it that they faked the crash because they want to keep whatever their probe finds to themselves. There’s a problem with that however, and it is that other probes and radio telescopes would pick up on Israel’s signals if they were lying about the crash. However, the following photo surfaced. I do not know if it is legit or not:
Assange smeared poo all over embassy walls??!!??They have a real smear campaign going against Assange. They are claiming he smeared his poop on the walls. DOUBT IT.As I said in earlier posts down the page a ways, if all of this is legit and it sure looks legit, he’s alive. I never in a million years expected that. But though I am prepared to believe he is alive and it actually is Assange (not totally there yet) I will NEVER EVER in a million years believe he was arrested because he smeared poop on the walls and they let the police in after he did it. That’s a load of crap, an obvious smear campaign.There are lots of rumors, one of which was that he was about to do an intelligence release on Ecuador (I don’t believe he’d be that stupid) and another far more believable rumor was that someone at the embassy let the police in, against the will of the government of Ecuador. I’d believe that, but am still only partly convinced he really got out. I will cover this as if he did get out because it does indeed look real but there is an awful lot that needs explaining if all of this is legit.
PRIVATE ISRAELI MOON PROBE ABOUT TO LAND,WATCH LIVE STREAM HEREI am no fan of Israel, however, this is still going to be worth a watch. If you catch this after 5 PM EST it is most likely over, they are unsure of a precise landing time but it is going on NOW.
CROW EATING TIME: It looks like Assange really is alive. (scroll down to main report)There are a few fishy things with his arrest, but it does look to me like he really is alive. And . . . . 911/311/411. Coincidence?The current situation with Trump is too complex and sporadic to really comment onFirst of all, it appears he’s sucking up to Israel and more as part of a deal to get a chance to hang a few traitors. At least it looks that way but who knows. Now we have Pelosi and others asking for apologies from anyone who mentions treason or spying or anything else and I believe this is a real lesson into how leftists and commies function when cornered. “Oh, you have that info? APOLOGIZE FOR IT, it is not legit.” Yet another layer in their mind control, hopefully the last layer – which implies YOU ARE SO WRONG WE WANT AN APOLOGY. When in reality you are dead center of the target.Obviously Trump is correct when he claims treason and coup and everything else, but we have yet to see any action at all on the topic. DEAR TRUMP: ONCE AGAIN, ACTION – NOT WORDS.On another noteworthy note that probably won’t be sung so my comment will be brief:And I thought about not commenting at all – Texas is proposing a full on abortion ban, including the death penalty for abortion doctors and women who get abortions. Though 446 spoke in favor of it with 54 against, I doubt it would pass. But if it does pass it would be a stunning paradigm shift in the right direction. I can’t imagine this happening. TPTB would make Texas the new Venezuela, failing grid and all. I would be genuinely surprised if Texas actually passed such a ban in full form, as it is currently stated, complete with death penalty.Spacex delayed it’s launch yesterday due to high altitude wind shear.So they are going to try to go for it today. 6:30 PM EST, Falcon Heavy, Arabsat communications satellite (probably complete with 300 inch downward looking reflector telescope, who needs a Falcon Heavy for a satellite? That’s the only advertised item on it, why such a huge rocket? I figure something is a little off with this . . . . Anyway, if you are interested in rocket launches this evening is probably a go. 
Amazon employees listening to Alexa conversations?Yep. They evidently have a whole department for that. I almost did not even mention this because if anyone is stupid enough to talk into any box like that, they don’t read this site anyway. Now imagine how loyal your “companion robot” is going to be. I can hardly wait.I guess the upshot of it all is that at least with Alexa, you are knowingly talking to something that can rat you out, rather than having an Android phone sit there like a silent stalker GOOGLING at you all the time.
Very odd, considering she hated him prior to 2016: Pamela calls Trump a coward for Assange arrest!I’ll obviously be eating crow because Assange is obviously alive. Guess what: 9/11, 3/11 and now Assange with 4/11. He’s awful cheerful in the pics. Perhaps a deal was made.
Black hole pictured: Non-storyNo black hole was pictured. The image going around the web and even made part of the Google doodle was not an optical telescopic photo of a black hole, it was instead the result of a math equation applied to data. This type of stuff has been done for years. Non story as far as I see it. When they actually photograph a black hole for real, I’ll take notice.
ASSANGE ARREST NOT AN OUTDATED ALREADY BROADCASTED OLD VIDEO AND PICS DREDGE GINSBURG SHOW
TOO MUCH ORIGINAL CONTENT FOR THE ASSANGE STORY TO BE FAKEI do not think they are using an actor either, it really does look like Assange across multiple clear photos that are all original, complete with exactly the types of scenes you’d expect to see.The only way I could have been partially right is if he was removed from the embassy in 2016 and held elsewhere, and then brought forward now. But I doubt it at this point, I’ll be eating crow I think. I do not think this is an actor, or that it is computer generated.
It really does look like Assange, in a way no one would have thought of faking.I am still looking for leads on him being arrested, to see if it is him and if this is just a “fake shooting” media show, but it really does look like him, with original photos, not faked. If so, I am going to be eating LOTS of crow.People have already started chattering about what they are going to do under the cover of “Assange being arrested”.Once again, this should not have been possible with the embassy doing official statements about how he was not getting evicted. This does not totally make sense.
Supposedly Assange was busted for something they could have busted him for in 2012This appears to be B.S. – the reason given was “Metropolitan Police said in a statement that they arrested Assange on a warrant issued by the Westminster Magistrates’ Court in June 2012, for failing to surrender to the court.”If they could walk into the embassy and do that, why this huge show for 7 years since? There’s something seriously bullshitty about that.That’s all there is to the story right now, plus three rather convincing pictures of him through a police van window. I am skeptical, but it sure looks real.
If it really is Assange and not some kind of act or fabrication, I certainly was not expecting it, I had him pegged as dead long ago.UPDATE: It appears to be Assange and not an impostor. But anything is possible with tech nowadays. There is a look to the photo I would not expect from software however, no matter how good.Supposedly Assange has been arrested and there’s a photo of him.It took several tries to get the photo here, it looks real. If it is real, I am going to be eating crow but will still say there’s no reason for him to have never stepped onto the balcony for all this time, in conjunction with the top 4 people at Wikileaks being killed off.At least it is not a photo that is based on another photo I have seen (I will be checking on that) but it does appear to be an original (unlike Ginsburg).
BOOOOOOOOM!!!! “Those who started Russia probe were attempting a ‘coup’, AG must start investigation – TrumpMy comment: ACTION, NOT WORDS BUDDY!!!Want proof the white race is targeted for death? HERE IT IS:From BreitbartParenting magazine Baby & Family has told readers to beware of families who are “inconspicuous” and “cheerful”, as these warning signs indicate they are right wing and thus “dangerous”.Depicted with illustrations featuring solely blonde women and children, the report says ordinary parents must take action against right-wing families and make clear that their ideology has no place in the world.Asserting that the term “right wing” “stirs up anxiety” and brings to mind “burning refugee homes”, skinheads, and the National Socialist Underground (NSU) group who carried out a string of violent attacks on foreign people, Baby & Family notes that people “rarely connect it with women, family and children”.My insert: The types of people who belong to the National Socialist Underground are FLAMING ANTI FAMILY LIBERALS, NOT the types this article is bashing and the homes burned were PAID FOR by RIGHT WING FAMILIES. This piece is absolute GARBAGE.continuing . . . .This, the high-circulation German magazine declares, “is precisely the great risk” as such people are just as dangerous if not more so as gangs of Nazi skinheads. The identifying features of right-wing families, it contends, are that they are “inconspicuous, blond, cute and engaged”.My comment: This reads like an april fools joke. But it is not.continuing . . . .“First of all, [right-wing families] are nice and dedicated” Michaela Kottig, sociologist and researcher of right-wing extremism at the Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, alleges.Researcher of right-wing politics, Eva Prausner, says a huge danger of right-wing families is that they seem normal.Because of this, she says many parents will already have established good relations with them to the point that they “are no longer marginalised and at worst, get support”.While there are different types of right-wing families, Baby & Family asserts that daycare centres should always seek help when dealing with them.”The right has many forms. The definition of what is extreme and what is not is difficult”, it says, but asserts that all manifestations must be dealt with because right wingers could spread their views when meeting with other parents in the playground.Heike Radvan of the controversial Amadeu Antonio Foundation warns that “children of right-wing parents are not necessarily different from other children”, but says they are often “very obedient” and might not talk much.Despite asserting that such children are not outspoken, the “experts” wheeled out by the magazine warn that a sinister aspect of right-wing parenting is that they instil self-confidence in their progeny.They do this, Prausner posits, in hope that “their offspring will later confidently carry their ideology into the world”.Kottig explains that right-wing families are not unlike ordinary families in that they teach their own values. The important difference with extreme right-wing groups, however, is that these values are “strongly geared at Germanic customs and traditions”.My comment: English is a Germanic language, and America has similar customs and traditions. Though this was a German publication, it is clear who the target is. And we all know who is shooting. This was not an April fools joke, this happened a while ago.

You may also like...

Translate »