“America First” Says President and NY Slimes is Offended-Get Over It; We All Want America 1st!
|NY SLIMES TAKES OFFENSE TO “AMERICA FIRST”
By Mike King
|“All The News That Sulzberger’s Propaganda Rag Saw Fit To Distort”|
A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
FREE SAMPLE 1 FED RESERVE NOTE
“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”
|FREE SAMPLE DAY
Subscribe to the Anti-New York Times and stay on top of world events.
NY Times: With Echoes of the ’30s, Trump Resurrects a Hard-Line Vision of ‘America First’
By DAVID E. SANGER
Globalists and communists everywhere, such as Slimes’s scribbler and TV gadfly David Sanger (cough cough), have got their pink panties up in a bunch over Trump’s unabashed and repeated use of the term, “America First.” Sanger’s distortion of both the term’s true meaning and the history surrounding it merits a strong rebuttal of some of its ugliest excerpts from yours truly and his ferocious feline sidekick here. Hazmat suits and goggles on, into Sulzberger’s cesspool of socialist sedition we go.
Sleazy Sanger spews his stinky slander on CNN, PBS and NBC
Sanger: America, and the world, just found out what “America First” means. President Trump could have used his inaugural address to define one of the touchstone phrases of his campaign in the most inclusive way, arguing, as did many of his predecessors, that as the world’s greatest superpower rises, its partners will also prosper.
Rebuttal: Why should Trump have to water down his Americanism in an “inclusive way” for the rest of the world? He is President of the United States, not “the world.”
Sanger: Instead, he chose a dark, hard-line alternative, …
Rebuttal: “Dark” — “hardline.” Oh dear; here it comes.
Sanger: … one that appeared to herald the end of a 70-year American experiment to shape a world that would be eager to follow its lead.
Translation: … one that appeared to herald the end of a 70-year old Globalist scheme to dominate the world as it was forced to follow America’s lead.
Sanger: In Mr. Trump’s vision, America’s new strategy is to win every transaction and confrontation.
Rebuttal: Wouldn’t that be better than losing every transaction and confrontation? Actually, Trump in win-win for all parties to a negotiation.
Sanger: “From this day forward, it’s going to be only America first,” he said, in a line that resonated around the world as soon as he uttered it from the steps of the Capitol. “We must protect our borders from the ravages of other countries making our products, stealing our companies and destroying our jobs.”
Rebuttal: Tell it Trump, tell it!
Sanger: Until today, American policy has been a complete rejection of the America First rallying cry that the famed flier Charles Lindbergh championed when, in the late 1930s, he became one of the most prominent voices to keep the United States out of Europe’s wars, even if it meant abandoning the country’s closest allies.
Rebuttal: Is there something wrong with seeking to avoid war? Lindbergh knew what the deceitful FDR was up to and sought to warn the public about his scheme to drag the U.S. into another bloodbath. Therefore, to oppose Lindbergh is to support the lying of FDR.
Lindbergh and the “America Firsters” tried to avert the coming disaster that the David Sangers of that day wanted to involve us in.
Lindbergh: “Leaders of the Jewish race are not American in interests and viewpoints”
Sanger: Mr. Trump has rejected comparisons with the earlier movement, with its taint of Nazism and anti-Semitism.
Rebuttal: There it is! A double jew-speak: Nazism TM and anti-Semitism TM.
Sanger: After World War II, the United States buried the Lindbergh vision of America First.
Rebuttal: Only because Americans bought the lie about “isolationism” having been the cause of World War II. Had the Internet existed back then, FDR would have been dragged from the White House and hanged from the nearest lamp-post.
Sanger: The United Nations was born in San Francisco …
Rebuttal: Point of interest: the Secretary General of that founding conference, Alger Hiss, was later exposed as a member of the U.S. Communist Part, and did jail-time for perjury for lying about his membership.
Sanger: … and raised on the East River of Manhattan,
Rebuttal: Yes, on land donated by those arch-Globalist villains, the Rockefeller Family.
Sanger: … an ambitious, if still unfulfilled, experiment in shaping a liberal order.
Translation: … an ambitious, if still unfilled conspiracy to establish a one-world government (New World Order).
1- The communist Alger Hiss shakes hands with Hiroshima Harry Truman at the founding conference of the United Nations in San Fagsicko, which Hiss headed. 2- John D Rockefeller III hands check to UN’s first Secretary General Trygve Lie of Norway.
Sanger: Lifting the vanquished nations of World War II into democratic allies was the idea behind the Marshall Plan, …
Translation: Buying up and consolidating the governments of the vulnerable nations of post-war Western Europe was the idea behind the Marshall Plan.
Sanger: And NATO was created to instill a commitment to common defense…
Rebuttal: Partially so. NATO was indeed critical in keeping the Globalists’ Soviet rivals for supremacy out of Western Europe. Ever since the fall of the Soviet Union, however, NATO has been strictly an offensiveorganization.
Sanger: To those who helped build that global order, Mr. Trump’s vow was at best shortsighted. “Truman and Acheson, and everyone who followed, based our policy on a ‘world-first,’ not an ‘America-first,’ basis,” said Richard N. Haass, whose new book, “A World in Disarray,” argues that a more granular, short-term view of American interests will ultimately fail.
Rebuttal: Hmmm. Richard Haass (cough cough), eh? So, the President of the world-government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations doesn’t approve of Trump use of the term “America First.”
Sanger: Mr. Trump cast America’s new role in the world as one of an aggrieved superpower, not a power intent on changing the globe. There was no condemnation of authoritarianism or fascism,…
Rebuttal: It’s ironic that Sanger should whine about “authoritarianism” when his hoped-for New World Order, if his beloved European Union offers any indication, would most assuredly be UNdemocratic (pun intended).
Sanger: …… no clarion call to defend human rights around the world.
Rebuttal: The term “human rights” TM refers to the “right” of CIA assets and Soros rent-a-mobs in targeted nations to subvert as they please without facing punishment from the “bad guy” leading the country.
1- Richard Haass of the CFR
2- Admiral Chester Ward, a 20 year member of the CFR who got wise: “In the entire CFR lexicon, there is no term of revulsion carrying a meaning so deep as ‘America First’” // 3- The “authoritarianism” of the super-bureaucratic EU doesn’t seem to bother Mr. Sanger.
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in today’s New York Times today that Trump’s use of the term ‘America First’ is raising concerns among some people.
Boobus Americanus 2: Indeed. It is a dark slogan that harkens back to the pre-World War 2 days of isolationism and anti-Semitism in America.
Sugar: How the frickety frack can a dessire to avoid war be anti-Ssemitic?! Dumb-asss!
Editor: All resistance to Globalism is “anti-Semitic.”
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS