Hollywood ZIONIST Wein[er]stein Takes Leave After Sexual Harassment Claims-Zionism=Synagogue of Satan
by Admin ·
by TUT editor
Harvey Weinstein to “Anti-Semites”: “Kick These Guys in the Ass”
By Jonas E. Alexis on March 28, 2015
Harvey Weinstein: “We’re gonna have to get as organized as the mafia.”
…by Jonas E. Alexis
If you haven’t noticed already, you should realize that in the Zionist universe, Zionist birds always flock together. Always. They comfort each other. They receive great accolades among their own Zionist brethren, and they brag about how they aspire to terrorize the Goyim with an ideological fist.
If you are not convinced, then ask Harvey Weinstein, who recently received the Humanitarian Award at the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s National Tribute Dinner last Tuesday. Speaking like an ideologue, Weinstein told his audience,
“We’re gonna have to get as organized as the mafia.”
Who’s we? Well, look no further: Weinstein again told his audience that Jewish radicals like himself will have to get organized for a specific purpose. “We better stand up and kick these guys [‘Anti-Semites’] in the ass,” he said. “We just can’t take it anymore [from] these crazy bastards.”
How will he go about kicking those guys “in the ass”? Pretty simple: through movies. He said,
“Too bad that movies can’t all be like Inglorious Basterds, where Hitler gets what he deserves.”
Like Michael Douglas, Weinstein seems to view “anti-Semitism” as a disease which always needs to be rooted out of the vast majority of the Goyim’s psyche.
Like European Union CEO Tormer Orni, who universally and ontologically declared that “anti-Semitism is part of Europe’s DNA,” Weinstein sees “anti-Semitism” as a disease which is now on the rise. He continues to say,
“I’m upset when I read The Atlantic Monthly’s headline that says, ‘should the Jews leave Europe?’—a resounding ‘no’ on my end—and [New York Times columnist] David Brooks today talking about how to combat anti-Semitism. It’s like, here we go again, we’re right back where we were [before the Holocaust].”
“I think it’s time that we, as Jews, get together with the Muslims who are honorable and peaceful — but we [also] have to go and protect ourselves. We have to build, once again, back into the breach. There’s a quote from Kurt Vonnegut’s book The Sirens of Titan and it always was the motto of Miramax and now The Weinstein Company.
“It says, ‘Good can triumph over evil if the angels are as organized as the mafia.’ That’s how we built our company! And, unfortunately, we [Jews] are gonna have to get as organized as the mafia. We just can’t take it anymore. We just can’t take these things. There’s gotta be a way to fight back….We need to stand up and kick these guys in the ass.’
“While we must be understanding of our Arab brothers and our Islamic brothers, we also have to understand that these crazy bastards [Arab and Islamic extremists] are also killing their own — they’re killing neighbors, they’re killing people from all sorts of different races.
“And, unlike World War II, when we didn’t act right away and we paid the price, we better start acting now. Trust me, I’m the last guy who wants to do anything about it, but I realize if we don’t, we will perish. We can’t allow the bad guys to win. So, as they say in The Godfather, ‘back to the mattresses,’ and back to the idea that we will not ever forget what happened to us.”
Weinstein was introduced as “a really nice Jewish boy” largely because he reached “the ultimate mitzvah!” In other words, to reach the “ultimate mitzvah” is to corrupt the culture.
When Inglorious Basterds was finally released, which was described as a “Jewish wish-fulfillment fantasy” by many and “kosher porn” by Eli Roth, Jewish producer Lawrence Bender told director Quentin Tarantino:
“As a fan, I thank you. As a producer, I thank you. As a member of the Jewish tribe, I thank you, mother fu$ker, because this movie is a fu$king Jewish wet dream.”
In another article, Bender said, “Quentin, you are about to make your Bar Mitzvah movie; you are going to be officially let into the tribe’” and celebrated “we’re getting to live out a fantasy of revenge, getting to do what every Jew probably dreamed of.”
Let us go back to Weinstein’s preliminary assumption, that “anti-Semitism” has nothing to do with Jewish behavior and has a lot to do with people simply hating Jews. Is he really that stupid? Don’t these people brag about having high IQ? Why can’t Weinstein figure out a simple formula? Didn’t Weinstein defend Jewish pedophiles like Roman Polanski?
Here is a man who never misses the opportunity to literally humiliate the Goyim and Western Culture in movies such as Concussion, The Reader, Inglorious Basterds, Sin City, Sin City: A Dame to Kill For, Black Christmas, All the Boys Love Mandy Lane, The Cook, the Thief, His Wife and Her Lover, Django Unchained, Killing Them Softly, Only God Forgives, etc., and now he is implicitly asking that the Goyim and everyone else should love him for morally putting them in the Hollywood meat grinder!
Moreover, didn’t Jewish producers in Hollywood make it clear right before The Interview was released that the Goyim in the industry are just pawns who will do just about anything for the almighty dollar?
Was it not Eli Roth who bragged that his work will “fu$k up an entire generation”? What if an entire generation doesn’t want to be “fu$ked”? What if people around the world rise up and fight those who want to “fu$k an entire generation?” Will it be “anti-Semitism” if they do?
Well, according to the reasoning of people like Weinstein, the answer is a resounding yes.
Whether they like it or not, Weinteisn and Roth are inexorably and indirectly articulating what both Jewish feminist writer Elizabeth Wurtzel and the late Rabbi Ovadia Yoself had postulated.
For her part, Wurtzel argues that Jews are ideologically “hopeless Talmudists,” and by definition they are politically expressing the ideological terrorism and the moral wickedness which flow effortlessly from the premises of Talmudic disputations.
So, the logic is pretty clear: Whether he likes it or not, Benjamin Netanyahu, who “expressed hope that he could appoint” United Torah Judaism leaders Yaakov Litzman and Moshe Gafni “as deputy health minister (Litzman) and head of the Knesset’s Finance Committee (Gafni),” is a hopeless Talmudist, which is one reason why he declared that the two-state solution will never happen on his watch.
Whether he likes it or not, David Cronenberg is a hopeless Talmudist, which is one reason why he has deliberately used pornography throughout his career to denigrate, humiliate, and corrupt the Goyim.
Whether the neoconservatives like it or not, they are hopeless Talmudists, which was one reason why they ended up drowning themselves, according to one Jewish writer, “in the disputatious heritage of the Talmud.”
This brings us face to face with Ovadia Yosef’s statement:
“Goyim were born only to serve Jews. Without that, they have no place in the world—only to serve the people of Israel.
“With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money.
“This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat… That is why gentiles were created.”
This racism flows directly from the teachings of the Talmud:
“The Talmud cites certain passages in the Old Testament to justify its racism, as when it claims, ‘O seed of Abraham, the Lord has spoken to you through Ezekiel’s mouth: you are my sheephold; that is, you are human beings, whereas the other peoples of this world are not at all humans, but beasts.’ Certain consequences flow from Talmud racism. For example:
“‘The Jew who rapes and kills a non-Jewish woman must be absolved in court, because he has done evil to ‘a mare.’ Maimonides, who is considered infallible in the ghettos, states in his treatise on homicide that the Israelite who kills a goy or a non-Jewish man cannot be punished. Doesn’t that suffice? One of the books of Israel that has authority seriously asserts that ‘the non-Jews are black animals’ or, in other words, wild boars.
“‘And so in such a way are treated all those who aren’t of its nationality by this race, that by its sexual excesses, was disgusting even to the Romans of the Caesars’ epoch, so that Tacitus called it proiectissima ad libidinem gens [a people wholly addicted to debauchery].’”
With respect to making peace with the Arabs, the good rabbi declared,
“How can you make peace with a snake? Those evildoers, the Arabs—it says in the Gemara [Talmud] that God is sorry he ever created those sons of Ishmael.”
Ovadia Yosef, Harvey Weinsten, Eli Roth, among others, are largely responsible for “anti-Semitism” or anti-Jewish reactions, which they claim have nothing to do with Jewish behavior. As Jewish historians themselves have argued, this anti-Jewish reaction cannot be separated from Jewish vices. Jewish historian Samuel Roth did not hesitate to write that everything the Jews see
“is only to be won away with the superior brain with which God has endowed his chosen ones. Each of them, when he grows up, becomes an agency of cunning to defeat the civil law. The Polish Jew does not remain in Poland. He migrates.
“Eventually he finds himself a rich nest in England, in France, in Germany, in America, in one of the South American countries. To each of the counties of his invasion the Jew brings the whole bag of commercial tricks and statutory maneuvers with which he poisons the arteries of the civilized world.”
Lastly, Weinstein can never explain to us what he means by “anti-Semitism” precisely because if the word is defined in a logical manner, then it will lose its political force. For instance, in 1988, Jewish journalist and Hollywood historian Neal Gabler wrote his influential book An Empire of their Own: How Jews Invented Hollywood.
Six years later, in 1994, British journalist William Cash adopted Gabler’s premise, arguing that Jews largely invented Hollywood in an article for the highly-read British journal Spectator.
Gabler, seemingly oblivious to the fact that Cash was simply reiterating the sentiments of An Empire of their Own, called Cash’s article an “anti-Semitic bleat from a reactionary crackpot”!
This attitude is appalling, but unfortunately it has become the rule rather than the exception among many Jewish writers and ideologues.
But the fact of the matter is that nearly all serious Jewish writers know that Hollywood is a Jewish town. Jewish journalist Joel Stein did not hesitate to write in the LA Times in 2008 that “Jews totally run Hollywood.” Here is Stein’s assessment:
“How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by:
“News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish).
“If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.”
Jewish talk show host Michael Medved wrote back in 1996,
“It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture…Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names.”
Medved also brought up the fact that the Disney studios were the product of a Gentile, but when Disney died in 1984, Michael Eisner took over and began to hire “highly paid Jewish moguls” such as Jeffrey Katzenberg, Michael Ovitz, and Joe Roth. By the end of that decade, Disney featured “Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions.” My Comment: It’s a private club and you’re not in it.
The simple question is this: is Weinstein going to deny all these facts? If yes, what kind of evidence will he accept? And why doesn’t he prove the “anti-Semites” wrong by leaving the industry? Why doesn’t he start a campaign saying things like,
“We are going to dismantle the anti-Semites by facts: we Jews are going to be a minority in Hollywood and will stop producing pornography as a way of corrupting the culture.”
I am pretty sure the so-called anti-Semites will disappear if Weinstein takes those steps. In fact, no “anti-Semite” hates people like Gilad Atmon and Norman Finkelstein and Amy Goodman and other decent people.
Put simply, Weinstein has to take some responsibility for anti-Jewish reactions around the world. If he still denies this, then perhaps it is time to assert that Weinstein is part of the traditional foe of the West. This is precisely why documents such as Civilta Cattolica forbade those people to take media position because they will corrupt the culture and reduce virtually everyone into “metaphysical nothingness.”
“Everywhere they paraded and parade their avid ambition; everywhere they bragged and brag about their divinely given superiority over the people among whom they lived and live; everywhere they showed and show themselves to be intractable, hostile and malevolent towards the nations that tolerated or tolerate them and even bestowed or bestow upon them the blessing of the right of citizenship.”
If they have no respect for the moral law, nations have the right to defend themselves against this “metaphysical nothingness,” which never respects truth.
 Scott Feinberg, “Harvey Weinstein Urges Jews to Take on Anti-Semites: ‘Kick These Guys in the Ass,’” Hollywood Reporter, March 24, 2015; see also Joel Bel Bruno, “Harvey Weinstein Has Choice Words About Anti-Semites,” LA Times, March 25, 2015.
 Yossi Lempkowicz, “‘Anti-Semitism Is Part of Europe’s DNA,’” European Jewish Press, September 5, 2012.
 Feinberg, “Harvey Weinstein Urges Jews to Take on Anti-Semites: ‘Kick These Guys in the Ass,’” Hollywood Reporter, March 24, 2015.
 Ben Child, “Quentin Tarantino Takes Inglorious Basterds to Israel,” Guardian, September 16, 2009.
 Andrew O’Hehir, “Is Tarantino Good for the Jews?” Salon, August 13, 2009
 Ami Eden, “‘Inglourious Basterds’ at JTS,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Dec. 18, 2009.
 See for example John Horn and Tina Daunt, “In Roman Polanski Case, Is It Hollywood vs. Middle America?,” LA Times, October 1, 2009; Jack Dunphy, “The National Review: Rushing to Defend Polanski,” National Public Radio, October 1, 2009; Jeremy Kay, “Roman Polanski Arrest: Hollywood Unites in His Defence,” Guardian, September 28, 2009; Paul Harris, “Roman Polanski Sex Case Arrest Provokes Backlash in Hollywood,” Guardian, October 4, 2009.
 Quoted in Stuart Dredge, “Netflix series Hemlock Grove: ‘People want their horror horrific,’ says Eli Roth,” Guardian, April 10, 2013.
 Elizabeth Wurtzel, “Standing Against a Tide of Hatred,” Guardian, January 16, 2009.
 Jonathan Lis, “Netanyahu tells Haredi MKs he hopes to give them the posts they want,” Haaretz, March 25, 2015.
 Sidney Blumenthal, The Rise of the Counter-Establishment: From Conservative Ideology to Political Power (New York: HarperCollins, 1988), 124.
 Quoted in Lazar Berman, “5 of Ovadia Yosef’s Most Controversial Quotations,” Times of Israel, October 9, 2013.
 E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014), 1175.
 Lazar Berman, “5 of Ovadia Yosef’s Most Controversial Quotations,” Times of Israel, October 9, 2013.
 Quoted in Jones, Barren Metal, 1187.
 Cited in E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1035-1036.
 Joel Stein, “Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon,” LA Times, December 19, 2008; scholar studies on this very issue, see for example Benjamin Ginsburg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
 Michael Medved, “Is Hollywood Too Jewish?,” Moment, vol. 21, No. 4, 1996: 37.