Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘sex slave’ Virginia Roberts settles her defamation lawsuit against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell who ‘passed her around for sex’ and trained her to be ‘everything a man wanted’
Lawyers for Roberts tell DailyMail.com: ‘We are happy to have settled this matter without the need for a trial and are pleased with the result’
Roberts, 33, had persuaded a judge to throw out a motion preventing her from suing British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, 55, for defamation
The defamation suit alleged Maxwell instructed her spokesman to attack Roberts’ honesty and truthfulness and to accuse her of lying
Roberts claimed Maxwell recruited her as a sex slave when she was 15 for convicted pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein and passed around to his friends
Maxwell, who was Epstein’s girlfriend at the time, is also accused of forcing her to have sex with Maxwell and other underage girls
The 55-year-old responded to the allegations with a damaging press release
In February 2016, a judge denied Maxwell’s request to throw out Roberts’ lawsuit when she said she was just defending herself against allegations
Virginia Roberts, the woman who claims she was an underage sex slave for perverted financier Jeffrey Epstein, has settled her lawsuit against the woman she claims recruited her, Ghislaine Maxwell.
Lawyers for Roberts, who now goes by her married name Giuffre, tell DailyMail.com: ‘We are happy to have settled this matter without the need for a trial and are pleased with the result.
The two women were die to see each other in court on Wednesday.
Roberts’ lawyers had recently persuaded a judge to throw out a motion that would have prevented her from suing Epstein’s one-time girlfriend for defamation. The decision had cleared the way for the civil case to go ahead in New York.
+2
Copy link to paste in your message
Virginia Roberts, 33, (who now goes by married name Virginia Giuffre) has settled her lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell for defamation after the British socialite released a damaging statement denying Roberts’s claims that she recruited her as a sex slave from 1999 to 2001
+2
Copy link to paste in your message
The 33-year-old alleges financier and registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused her for years as Maxwell (who was his girlfriend at the time) passed her around among Epstein’s friends for sex
The defamation suit alleged Maxwell instructed her spokesman to attack Roberts’ honesty and truthfulness and to accuse her of lying.
Maxwell, the daughter of former British press baron Robert Maxwell who died when he fell off his yacht in 1991, had argued that a press release in which she attacked Roberts was protected speech.
But Judge Robert Sweet refused to accept that argument in a 76-page decision, saying that Roberts was arguing that Maxwell released the damaging statement out of ‘malice.’
It was the second time the judge has sided with Roberts. In February last year he denied Maxwell’s request to throw out the lawsuit when she said she was just defending herself against allegations that she helped set up sexual encounters between Roberts and powerful men.
Roberts, now a 33-year-old mother-of-three, says she was recruited by Maxwell when she was just 15. She claims she was then passed around among Epstein’s friends for underage sex.
Maxwell, 55, was Epstein’s girlfriend at the time.
In her lawsuit filed in 2015, Roberts — who now goes by her married name Virginia Giuffre — described how she became a victim of sex trafficking after Maxwell recruited her from a hotel where she worked.
‘With the assistance of Maxwell, Epstein was able to sexually abuse Giuffre for years until Giuffre eventually escaped,’ the lawsuit says.
‘As part of their sex trafficking efforts, Epstein and Maxwell intimidated Giuffre into remaining silent about what had happened to her.’
After Roberts went public with her allegations, she describes how Maxwell undertook a ‘concerted and malicious campaign to discredit Giuffre’ so that her claims would not be believed.
The defamation suit alleged Maxwell instructed her spokesman to ‘attack Giuffre’s honesty and truthfulness and to accuse Giuffre of lying.’
It claimed Maxwell made a deliberate effort to ‘maliciously discredit Giuffre and silence her efforts to expose sex crimes committed around the world by Maxwell, Epstein and other powerful persons. Maxwell made her statements knowing full well they were false.’
Maxwell has always refused to talk about her involvement with Epstein and has denied any involvement in sex trafficking.
My Comment: In the book “Filthy Rich”Jeffery Epstein created a science website which covered these topics of interest:
Value of Quantum Computation
CERN
Evolutionary Biology
Theoretical Physics
Cognitive Neuroscience
Artificial Intelligence
Systems of Encryption and Decryption
as well as Workshops in Cosmology
He especially recruited Stephen Hawking who believed that computer viruses were living things and believed in alien life forms even giving a very special gift to Hawkings-paying to have a submarine modified so Hawking could fit his wheel chair into it and see an actual under the ocean alien world. Epstein also had a scientific symposium on Confronting Gravity at St. Thomas. Nobel Laureates and twenty top physicists attended. He hosted a Mindshift conference for the Nobel laureates such as theoretical physicist Murray-Gell-Mann would mix with surgeons, engineers, futurists and professors. Given the sinister implications of CERN and artificial intelligence involvement with Transhumanism It is alarming that a child pimp such as ZIONIST Jeffery Epstein would be hobnobbing with the elite and Prostituting? children to them. Many famous names were involved and the key feature of this case is the nonprosecution of these individuals and Jeffrey Epstein’s NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT! I wouldn’t doubt his involvement with funding CERN and the Black Quantum Computer. Jeffrey Epstein owned the Pedophile Paradise Island in the Caribbean where both Clintons flew to numerous times. Allegedly children were murdered there but since the article came out it has since been wiped from the internet.
A woman who claimed that New York financier Jeffrey Epstein trafficked her for sex when she was a teenager may pursue a lawsuit accusing British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell of defamation for calling her allegations lies, a U.S. judge ruled. In a decision on Monday night, U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet in Manhattan denied Maxwell’s request to dismiss Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit.
Ghislaine Maxwell filed a 70-page motion for summary judgment with the court under seal. As the civil lawsuit is a public proceeding, the case should never have been sealed.
Cernovich Media retained leading first amendment attorney Marco Randazza to represent the interests of the public and the many readers and listeners of Cernovich Media.
Marc Randazza, Cernovich’s attorney, commented:
The courts belong to the people, not the parties. The First Amendment demands that court proceedings be open to the public. How can a free press do its job in keeping a watchful eye over the workings of government if those workings are sealed? There may be rare circumstances where limited amounts of information are subject to redaction. But, for a motion for summary judgment to be entirely under seal? Even the CIA releases documents with a few words un-redacted.
Why isn’t the New York Times filing lawsuits involving pedophiles? Where is the Washington Post? Where, for that matters, is the Associated Press? Does Jeffrey Epstein have some dirt on our media CEOs and leading journalists?
Cernovich Media is shining a spotlight on the rich and powerful. As the motion states:
Part of Cernovich Media’s mission is conducting investigative journalism in pursuit of an open government. Maxwell’s currently sealed pleadings, and anticipated future related documents, prevents the public from learning about wrongdoing by high level government officials, media moguls and high profile business people.
Cernovich Media is an organization whose mission is to use and promote investigative journalism as a tool to expose corruption and abuse of public power by promoting transparency, accountability, and public awareness, by involving private citizens in the discussion of these problems. Cernovich Media cannot conduct its Fourth Estate function if this Court allows the Parties to conduct their dispute outside of the normal sunlight of transparency and accessibility. The public has a right to see Maxwell’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the press is here to show it to them.
A hearing on Cernovich Media’s motion to unseal records will be held on February 17th.
ORDER: The motion to intervene filed January 19, 2017 shall be heard at noon on Thursday, February 16, 2017 in Courtroom 18C, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street before Judge Robert W. Sweet.
You may read the full motion and Cernovich’s affidavit here: