Skip to toolbar

WE ARE CHANGE MAIL

REPORT: Sean Hannity, Erik Prince And More Unmasked By John Brennan


REPORT: Sean Hannity, Erik Prince And More Unmasked By John Brennan

Posted: 06 Apr 2017 10:53 AM PDT

We Are Change

GotNews has reported that Fox News’ Sean Hannity and Blackwater founder, Erik Prince were spied on and unmasked by the Obama administration’s own John Brennan.

Barack Obama‘s CIA Director John O. Brennan targeted Trump supporters for enhanced surveillance, intelligence sources confirm to GotNews’ Charles C. Johnson.

The surveillance took place between Trump’s election on November 8 and the inauguration in January, according to White House and House intelligence sources.

The focus was on General Mike Flynn, billionaire Erik Prince, and Fox News host Sean Hannity — all of whom had close ties to Trump before and after the November election and had helped the future president with managing his new diplomatic responsibilities.

Hannity was targeted because of his perceived ties to Julian Assange, say our intelligence sources. Hannity was reportedly unmasked by Susan Rice at Brennan’s behest thanks to his close relationship with Trump and Julian Assange.

Blackwater founder Erik Prince, a former CIA covert asset, has long criticized the CIA’s bloat and incompetence, including the Brennan-run CIA drone program’s failure to properly target terrorists rather than Afghan civilians. Prince has repeatedly called for restructuring the CIA and argued against Brennan’s tenure.

GotNews’ Chuck Johnson went on to explain the feuding history of Brennan and General Flynn.

The motivations for Brennan’s dislike of Flynn date back years. The two had publicly feuded during Flynn’s time as Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). Flynn was producing intel documents that showed how the supposed Syrian moderates were actually assets of Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Brennan also brought in disgraced Syria analyst Elizabeth O’Bagy to brief the CIA. O’Bagy was outed by this reporter for manufacturing her credentials and for being paid by the Syrian rebels. O’Bagy worked for the defense industry funded Institute for the Study of War, a neocon think tank headed by the Kagans, a controversial family which advised David Petraeus. Petraeus was brought down. Intel sources I’ve spoken to believe Brennan was behind his ousting.

Former CIA agent John Kiriakou discussed John Brennan’s “deep-seated hatred of Trump” and decision to make “Russian intervention… the hammer he is going to hit Trump with.” “Flynn has been screwed by the agency in the past and Flynn has had a difficult personal relationship with Brennan,” Kiriakou said in January. “Even though Brennan is gone, the CIA is still being run by Brennan’s people.” Both Flynn and Trump called for reorganizing the CIA–a direct threat to Brennan’s remaking of the CIA.

Going further than the spying on Trump supporters by the former CIA director, a CIA whistleblower has alleged that Brennan also spied on Supreme Court Justices, government employees, judges, businessmen and more.

[RELATED: CIA Whistleblower Leaks 47 Hard Drives Exposing Obama Administration Spying]

Then there is the prior spying on the Senate when the CIA got caught not only surveilling Senators, but they hacked into Senate computers when the Senate Intelligence Committee was preparing its damning report on the C.I.A.’s detention and interrogation program.

“As far as the allegations of, you know, CIA hacking into, you know, Senate computers, nothing could be further from the truth. I mean we wouldn’t do that. I mean, that’s just beyond the – you know, the scope of reason in terms of what we would do,” Brennan said.

“If I did something wrong,” Brennan continued in March, “I will go to the president, and I will explain to him exactly what I did, and what the findings were. And he is the one who can ask me to stay or to go.”

If Brennan is found to be guilty of surveilling people connected to Trump domestically and surveilling judges, Supreme Court Justices, government employees and businessmen he may have a whole lot of other problems coming his way.

The post REPORT: Sean Hannity, Erik Prince And More Unmasked By John Brennan appeared first on We Are Change.

CNN Reporter Dumbfounded After Congressman Questions Syria Attack

Posted: 06 Apr 2017 10:46 AM PDT

We Are Change

CNN anchor Kate Bolduan was left dumbfounded during a televised interview with congressman Thomas Massie in which he questioned the mainstream narrative that Bashar al-Assad attacked his own people with chemical weapons.

The CNN reporter was left speechless as she was questioned on the complicated situation that is Syria.

“It’s hard to know exactly what’s happening in Syria right now. I’d like to know specifically how that release of chemical gas, if it did occur — and it looks like it did — how that occurred,” Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie told CNN’s Kate Bolduan.

He continued to express his uncertainty regarding the attacks, questioning the motive of why Assad would suddenly attack his own people.

“Because frankly, I don’t think Assad would have done that. It does not serve his interests. It would tend to draw us into that civil war even further,” Massie said.

A sentiment shared by the Syrian Deputy Ambassador at the UN Security Council and two prominent journalists with knowledge on Syria.

“Who is the beneficiary of chemical attacks? It is the terrorist Forces that seek to topple our govt,” Syrian Deputy Ambassador at UNSC said.

[RELATED: False Flag in Syria? Journalists Raise Alarms On Gas Attack]

Bolduan struggled for words after confronted by the congressman having her narrative smashed to pieces before muttering out a simple: “Who do you think is behind it?”

Massie proceeded to answer her question before the CNN anchorwoman cut him off and asked him if he was stating that he believes what the Russians are saying that Assad had nothing to do with the attack and that the attack was simply just chemicals stored in an ammunition depot.

However, the lawmaker stuck to his guns, reiterating his earlier position to Bolduan:

“I don’t think it would’ve served Assad’s purposes to do a chemical attack on his people…It’s hard for me to understand why he would do that — if he did,” Massie said.

If Bolduan was a good journalist like Seymore Hersh, that didn’t just read off a teleprompter, but thought for herself, she would know that contrary to popular belief, rebels in the region have been caught numerous times years prior gassing their own people and were even condemned by a UN official.

In the infamous 2013 gas attack, UN official Del Ponte said that evidence pointed that the rebels used sarin gas.

Then there is a UN report that states that Al-Tamanah on the night of April 29-30, 2014 might well have been staged by rebels and then played up by activists through social media.

“Seven witnesses stated that frequent alerts about an imminent chlorine weapons attack by the government had been issued, but in fact no incidents with chemicals took place,” the U.N. report stated. “While people sought safety after the warnings, their homes were looted and rumours spread that the events were being staged. … They these witnesses had come forward to contest the widespread false media reports.”

Then, in 2016 Syria handed over evidence to an international watchdog organization reportedly proving rebels used mustard gas against civilians.

Syrian authorities gave documents and samples evincing the use of mustard gas by rebels to the mission of the Technical Secretariat of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW.)

Further, they stated that in January of this year the samples would be delivered to the Hague.

So, to rehash the question by the Syrian Deputy Ambassador and Rep Thomas Massie: why would Syria’s Assad gas his own people when only a few months ago he handed documents that proved rebels gassed civilians to a watchdog group and the Hague?

It’s also worth noting that Massie voted against the 2014 intervention into Syria. An excellent question to ask the rebels is “why haven’t you caught any of these horrendous attacks on video but you somehow capture the aftermath?”

[RELATED: Why ISIS, Obama and John Kerry Don’t Want You To Hear This Leaked Audio]

The post CNN Reporter Dumbfounded After Congressman Questions Syria Attack appeared first on We Are Change.

House Intel Chairman Devin Nunes Recuses Himself From Russia Probe Investigation

Posted: 06 Apr 2017 07:56 AM PDT

We Are Change

House Rep. Devin Nunes (R) has recently stated that he is no longer going to be involved in the Russian probe investigation which revealed unmasking and surveillance on the Trump administration. He has issued a statement on the matter to the media:

“Several leftwing activist groups have filed accusations against me with the Office of Congressional Ethics. The charges are entirely false and politically motivated, and are being leveled just as the American people are beginning to learn the truth about the improper unmasking of the identities of U.S. citizens and other abuses of power. Despite the baselessness of the charges, I believe it is in the best interests of the House Intelligence Committee and the Congress for me to have Representative Mike Conaway, with assistance from Representatives Trey Gowdy and Tom Rooney, temporarily take charge of the Committee’s Russia investigation while the House Ethics Committee looks into this matter. I will continue to fulfill all my other responsibilities as Committee Chairman, and I am requesting to speak to the Ethics Committee at the earliest possible opportunity in order to expedite the dismissal of these false claims.”

These “false claims” that Nunes is talking about is the question of whether or not he disclosed classified information to the public. On March 22, Nunes claimed that Trump and his associates were “incidentally” swept up by domestic intelligence communities, surveilled, and then unmasked in the corresponding documents picked up by intelligence communities. He then went on to brief President Trump on his findings. Trump followed up by saying he was “somewhat” vindicated by Nunes’ briefing.

House Ethics Committee confirms it is investigating Devin Nunes for possible disclosures of classified information pic.twitter.com/MF6gNEEUnZ

— Bradd Jaffy (@BraddJaffy) April 6, 2017

Now, it looks like we won’t see Devin Nunes’ name on the headlines talking about this topic anymore, as it seems he wants to disassociate himself with this discussion. As a member of the House of Representatives, surely this isn’t his first time being attacked by leftist groups, so why give up now?

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has responded to this news by issuing a statement of his own:

“Devin Nunes has earned my trust over many years for his integrity and dedication to the critical work that the intelligence community does to keep America safe. He continues to have that trust, and I know he is eager to demonstrate to the Ethics Committee that he has followed all proper guidelines and laws. In the meantime, it is clear that this process would be a distraction for the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russian interference in our election. Chairman Nunes has offered to step aside as the lead Republican on this probe, and I fully support this decision. Chairman Mike Conaway, a senior member of the Committee, will now lead this investigation in the House. I am confident that he will oversee a professional investigation into Russia’s actions and follow the facts wherever they lead.”

For more in Nunes’ original claims in the investigation, watch the below video:

The post House Intel Chairman Devin Nunes Recuses Himself From Russia Probe Investigation appeared first on We Are Change.

Suddenly, Both Obamacare Repeal And Trump Tax Reform Are Dead

Posted: 06 Apr 2017 01:52 AM PDT

We Are Change

Article via Zero Hedge

It was a one-two knockout punch for anyone still holding out hope that Trump’s domestic economic policies will take place in the near, or not even so near, future.

First, Rep. Patrick McHenry, a member of House Republican leadership, said on Wednesday afternoon that conservatives’ proposals to reach a compromise on healthcare are a “bridge too far” to win support from colleagues.  McHenry, the chief deputy whip, told reporters that calls from the conservative House Freedom Caucus to allow states to apply for waivers to repeal ObamaCare protections for people with pre-existing conditions are a “bridge too far for our members” and can’t get enough votes to pass.

The comments come after a late-night meeting among House GOP groups on Tuesday fell flat, and lawmakers appear to be heading home at the end of the week for a recess without any tangible progress toward a deal to revive their healthcare bill.

McHenry said lawmakers need a “cooling off period” over the two-week break. “We need people to stop, take a deep breath, and think through the way to yes,” he said.

As McClathy sums it up, “conservative interest groups are on the warpath, charging the new ideas don’t go far enough to destroy the 7-year-old Affordable Care Act. On the other end of the GOP political divide, moderate House Republicans are withholding support for the new White House-backed changes. They fear the revisions would jeopardize the health law’s requirement that individual insurers cover people with pre-existing medical conditions.”

Conservative activists Wednesday blamed at least five members of the centrist House Tuesday Group for the impasse. Conservatives complained the moderates were not eager to allow states to opt out of two popular ACA provisions: One would require all plans to cover 10 “essential health benefits” and another would bar insurers from charging sick people more for coverage than healthy people. Although both rules increase the cost of individual insurance, patient advocates say they ensure that coverage is standardized, thorough and accessible to those who need it.

Michael Needham, chief executive officer of Heritage Action, a leading conservative group, was sharply critical Wednesday of GOP centrists Reps. David Joyce of Ohio, Leonard Lance of New Jersey and Patrick Meehan of Pennsylvania. They “were standing in the way of legislative compromise that is being pushed by the White House and which would get overwhelming support in the Republican conference.”

“They’re opposed because they don’t want to repeal Obamacare,” Needham told reporters on a conference call. He said lawmakers should begin their congressional recess, scheduled to start Thursday afternoon, and vote on the legislation when they return.

The conservative Club for Growth piled on, accusing Republican moderates of torpedoing a potential deal. “The left wing among House Republicans doesn’t want to compromise or keep their pledge to voters to repeal Obamacare,” said Club for Growth President David McIntosh.

Moderates, in turn, blamed conservatives for constantly altering their demands. “Repeal and replace,” said Lance. “I have never campaigned on a mere repeal, ever.”

Rep. Chris Collins, R-N.Y., one of President Donald Trump’s closest House allies, said Heritage “is about one thing: raising money. They raise money on controversy. The more controversy, they blast out an email, they gin up their supporters. They cash the checks and they move on.

And so on, as the blame game has resumed. In other words, despite the White House’s stated desire to get a vote off by Friday, Obamacare repeal is dead for the foreseeable future.

* * *

And then it weas Ryan’s turn: the House Speaker, also on Wednesday afternoon, said that tax reform will take longer to accomplish than repealing and replacing Obamacare would, saying Congress and the White House were initially closer to agreement on healthcare legislation than on tax policy.

“The House has a (tax reform) plan but the Senate doesn’t quite have one yet. They’re working on one. The White House hasn’t nailed it down,” Ryan told an audience in Washington.

“So even the three entities aren’t on the same page yet on tax reform,” he added.

Translation: both healthcare and tax reform are now indefinitely dead, which means that a suddenly pivoting Trump, who earlier today said he had “changed his mind” on Syria, may have no choice but to begin war with Assad to distract from everything else that is going on in the US.


This article first appeared on ZeroHedge.com and was authored by Tyler Durden.

The post Suddenly, Both Obamacare Repeal And Trump Tax Reform Are Dead appeared first on We Are Change.

If Trump Is ‘Connected’ To The Russians, Then So Are The Clintons

Posted: 06 Apr 2017 01:43 AM PDT

We Are Change

If Hillary Clinton ended up winning the presidency, do you think that there would have been allegations of Russian election tampering, or subsequent allegations by the mainstream media of Trump actually having ties to the Russians? Probably not. Why?

Could it be because the Clintons are also connected to the Russians? Yes! They’re ALL connected! And so, had she won, the last thing she would have done is gone after Trump. Not just because she won and there would have been no reason to attempt to undermine his presidency, but because she and her family also rub elbows with the Russians.

And you know what’s strange, Russian multinationals are by and large no different than US multinationals, the only difference is the flag. They’re all the same. Profits over people.

So, when it comes down to it, all the media is really doing is playing off the stigma that comes with “Russia”, and accusing Trump of being some kind of pro-Russian sell out. He’s not a pro-Russian sell out, he’s just a sell out. Just like Hillary, Bill, Obama, Dubyah and the whole lot! Pick a country, any country; he’ll build there and establish the necessary political ties. Why is this so surprising? The oligarchs and billionaire class do this all around the world. The only difference is that if you do it in Russia, then suddenly you’re a double agent of sorts

As the Voltaire saying goes, “When it is a question of money, everybody is of the same religion.” Well, the same goes for nationality. I’m by no means defending Trump, he’s just being a shameless and ruthless capitalist, just like the Clintons and all the rest of them.

It would be one thing if Trump’s ties to Russia were very political, in the sense that his goal is to actually serve the national interest of the Russian government, or even worse, their military. However, he’s just being an opportunist, and Russia just happens to have 77 billionaires. And guess who else cashes in on Russian billionaires, the Clintons. What do ya know!

With that being said, while the mainstream media goes full force with regard to picking apart Trump’s financial ties to Russia, do you really think they would have done the same had Clinton won? Because one thing’s for sure, the Clintons have been courting Russian oligarchs for well over a decade, even to the point of involving the Clinton state department.

In emails first obtained by the conservative group Citizens United, the Clinton Foundation staff asked the state department, and was ultimately given the go ahead, to invite Russian billionaire Viktor Veselberg — who has donated at least $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation — to meet with Clinton’s state department.

And the Clinton’s Russian ties go deeper. The wife of Russian billionaire Leonard Blavatnik, Emily Blavatanik, has donated $33,400 to the Democratic Party, and most recently gave the maximum donation for an individual, $2,700, to Hillary Clinton during her presidential campaign. And the same goes for Daria Zhukova, wife of billionaire oil magnate Roman Abramovich, who also donated $2,700 to Clinton’s campaign. It should be noted that Roman Abramovich is a notorious Putin ally. And speaking of former KGB agents (Putin), billionaire Gennady Timchenko, who is widely rumored to have a KGB past and is believed to be part of Putin’s so called “politburo”, acquired several holdings of Clinton donor Tom Steyer’s hedge fund in 2010.

And then there’s John Podesta and his brother, Tony, who founded the lobbying firm the Podesta Group, a firm which in 2016 lobbied on behalf of Sberbank, which is owned by the Russian Central Bank. Why is this significant? Because John Podesta was also Clinton’s campaign manager.

According to the Observer:

“The firm also lobbied for a pro-Russian political party in Ukraine, the same one that caused Trump adviser Paul Manafort to resign in embarrassment after it was revealed that he worked for former pro-Russian Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych. Politico reported that the revelations about Manafort were provided to the Clinton campaign from the Ukrainian government through a DNC consultant who met with Ukrainian officials at the Ukrainian embassy in Washington D.C.”

The post If Trump Is ‘Connected’ To The Russians, Then So Are The Clintons appeared first on We Are Change.

White House: ‘The Clock Has Now Run Out’ On North Korea

Posted: 06 Apr 2017 01:32 AM PDT

We Are Change

The rhetoric is seen more as a message to China than a practical threat to North Korea.

Article via Antiwar

The US has been talking up the idea of “all options” being on the table against North Korea, unilateral military attacks in particular, for weeks now, and appears to be stepping up that narrative again this week, declaring that “the clock has now run out” on North Korea.

It’s not clear this actually means imminent US action, or even that such action is likely at all, because these comments are coming just days ahead of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to the US to meet with President Trump, and in that context, this is seen more as a message to China than a practical threat to North Korea.

The Trump Administration’s position on North Korea from the start has been that China has “enormous” influence and could resolve the situation more or less trivially. China agreed to cut off coal imports as a nod to US calls to “do something” against North Korea, but since then have tried to get the US to countenance some sort of diplomatic effort with a negotiated settlement.

But despite “all options are on the table,” being a phrase the administration has eagerly picked up from its predecessors, it’s not true, because several top officials have made clear diplomacy is no longer being considered at all.

Indeed, if there is one message the administration has tried to get over beyond demanding China do something, it’s that past attempts at diplomacy are to blame for the US not having already imposed a military solution on North Korea.


This article first appeared on Antiwar.com and was authored by Jason Ditz.

The post White House: ‘The Clock Has Now Run Out’ On North Korea appeared first on We Are Change.

After Using Chemical Weapons at Standing Rock, U.S. Slams Syrian Attack

Posted: 06 Apr 2017 01:24 AM PDT

We Are Change

Article via The Anti-Media by Carey Wedler

Politicians around the world are rightly condemning the recent suspected chemical weapons attack in Syria that killed dozens of civilians, including children — even if their finger pointing at President Bashar al-Assad lacks conclusive evidence to support their confident accusations.

Of course, these allegations ignore previous evidence that Syrian rebels were responsible for the attack — arguably rebels the West has made a habit of empowering over the years.

Regardless of who was responsible for the gruesome attack, however, the politicians condemning the carnage most vehemently have little ground to stand on considering their perceived authority stems from a government guilty of using chemical weapons.

The use of chemical and biological weapons in warfare was banned after World War I — a prohibition that was reaffirmed in 1972 and again in 1993. Tear gas, which is recognized as a chemical weapon, was included in the 1993 ban, but the final agreement allowed governments to use it domestically for riot control.

American police have used it to suppress protests for decades. Though the vast majority of protesters at the Dakota Access Pipeline demonstrations in Standing Rock, North Dakota, were peaceful, law enforcement sprayed them with the chemical weapon, anyway. Though tear gas is a relatively mild chemical weapon compared to sarin gas, it can cause severe adverse health effects. A reputed U.N. lawyer forcefully condemned its use, along with other heavy-handed police tactics. Few American lawmakers came to their defense.

U.S. law enforcement also deployed tear gas against black civil rights protesters in the 1960s and officers have continued to do so at protests against police brutality in recent years. But the government has used far worse chemical weapons than tear gas.

The United States military used Agent Orange to destroy the opposition in its ill-fated war against Vietnam (it also used napalm extensively, a chemical that, when mixed with gasoline and bombs, amplifies explosions and poisons the air).

U.S. planes sprayed some 11 million to 13 million gallons of Agent Orange in Vietnam between January 1965 and April 1970” to destroy foliage the Vietcong used for cover, History.com has noted. To this day, Vietnamese individuals suffer the consequences of the United States’ weaponization of the chemical herbicide and defoliant. Between 2.1 and 4.5 million Vietnamese lived in regions sprayed with the chemical, and its remnants remain in the soil.

One of the active ingredients, dioxin, “has been shown to be highly toxic even in minute doses; human exposure to the chemical could be associated with serious health issues such as muscular dysfunction, inflammation, birth defects, nervous system disorders and even the development of various cancers.

Though some might dispute the notion that Agent Orange, supplied to the U.S. military by Monsanto, Dow Chemical, and other corporations, is actually a chemical weapon, there is little technical doubt. Both herbicides and defoliants are considered chemicals, meaning when they are intentionally used in warfare, they are chemical weapons. Perhaps the biggest difference between the two chemicals is that nerve gas kills victims almost immediately whereas Agent Orange often leads to diseases that take lives over time.

According to Vietnamese officials, Agent Orange has killed or maimed as many as 400,000 people.

Further, a 2001 study that investigated the effects of Agent Orange on the reproductive systems of Vietnamese women described the use of the toxic herbicide as “chemical warfare” that had dire effects, including miscarriages, premature births, and “congenital malformations or developed disabilities within the first years of life” among ? of babies born to parents exposed to it.

To this day, the U.S. military is paying out settlements to thousands of veterans who were negatively affected by the chemical and, like Vietnamese parents, passed the damage down to their children. The military’s own website acknowledges Agent Orange may be responsible for various cancers, including Leukemia, as well Parkinson’s disease, heart disease, and birth defects in offspring.

Unsurprisingly, when the chemical weapons ban was reaffirmed in 1972, the United States insisted that herbicides should not be included and that their use did not constitute chemical warfare.

In the 1980s, the CIA reportedly knew Saddam Hussein was using chemical weapons in his U.S.-backed war with Iran. But the U.S. government did nothing to stop him — in one instance, they helped advance an attack against Iran knowing Hussein was using banned sarin and mustard as weaponry.

The United States is not the only Western power that has employed treacherous chemical weapons in warfare. As The Guardian has pointed out, Great Britain also unleashed them in their fight against the Bolsheviks in World War I and in Gaza in 1917. Historical hero Winston Churchill also insisted on using them against “rebellious” tribes in India. “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes,” he said in a secret memo. France and Germany also used nonlethal chemical weapons in World War I — around the same time Western colonial powers were seeking to dominate and partition the Middle East, including Syria.

The West is now categorically condemning the chemical attack in Syria.

Notably, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also quickly denounced the recent chemical attack in Syria, saying, “When I saw pictures of babies suffocating from a chemical attack in Syria, I was shocked and outraged. There’s no, none, no excuse whatsoever for the deliberate attacks on civilians and on children, especially with cruel and outlawed chemical weapons.”

Conveniently absent from his condemnation was any acknowledgment that the Israeli government has used chemical weapons. In 2009, a Human Rights Watch report declared  Israel had knowingly released white phosphorus on civilian populations in Gaza. As the Guardiansummarized:

In a 71-page report, the rights group said the repeated use of air-burst white phosphorus artillery shells in populated areas of Gaza was not incidental or accidental, but revealed ‘a pattern or policy of conduct.’

The Israel government initially denied using chemical weapons, only to later admit they had. They asserted they were used in accordance with international law and had not targeted civilians.

Regardless, as the media continues to direct its hysteria at the Syrians tragically suffering in Syria, politicians are aiming to claim the moral high ground — if not blame Assad without conclusive evidence — cobbling together a strategy to push for his removal from power. Though last week the Trump administration said regime-change in Syria would no longer be a U.S. foreign policy goal, following the attack on Tuesday the president said his “attitude toward Assad and Syria has changed very much.” He has not indicated whether he intends to impose more military force.

As this feeding frenzy wears on, beware moral grandstanders in public office who will undoubtedly neglect to acknowledge the carnage their own government’s chemical weapons have imposed on civilians over the course of the last century, all while they continue to advocate further war and intervention in 2017.

Indeed, bombs kill civilians just as easily as chemical weapons do, and while Western politicians may neglect their own countries’ histories to condemn their political opponents, their own bombs are wiping out civilians just as easily as sarin gas.


Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo

The post After Using Chemical Weapons at Standing Rock, U.S. Slams Syrian Attack appeared first on We Are Change.

Trump’s Syria Tweets Have Been Consistently Anti-Intervention Since 2013, What Happened?

Posted: 05 Apr 2017 11:52 PM PDT

We Are Change

As the globalist neoconservatives and former “anti-war” liberals bang the drums of war with Syria, President Donald Trump appeared to change his previously anti-intervention tone on Wednesday — much to the dismay of many of his supporters.

For the past four years, Trump has repeatedly demanded that the US stay out of Syria, so…

Here is a timeline of all of his tweets containing the word “Syria” since May, 2013:

On May 27, 2013, five days after the US Senate panel backed arming the rebels, Trump tweeted a question as to why Senator John McCain was in Syria — as well as what became his campaign slogan.

Why is Senator John McCain in Syria visiting with the rebels- MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 27, 2013

Two days later, on May 29, 2013, Trump tweeted, “Obama wants to unilaterally put a no-fly zone in Syria to protect Al Qaeda Islamists,” and stated that “Syria is NOT our problem.”

Obama wants to unilaterally put a no-fly zone in Syria to protect Al Qaeda Islamists http://t.co/DCgP83Oxas Syria is NOT our problem.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 29, 2013

On June 15, 2013, the day after the US announced increased “military support” to rebels, Trump tweeted that they are as bad as the current regime — and that we should stay out of Syria. He also expressed his non interventionist “America first” policy by noting that we would gain nothing from what would cost billions of dollars, as well as our citizen’s lives.

We should stay the hell out of Syria, the “rebels” are just as bad as the current regime. WHAT WILL WE GET FOR OUR LIVES AND $ BILLIONS?ZERO

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 16, 2013

On August 18, 2013, Trump quoted a tweet that mocked then-President Barack Obama for golfing as Syria, Egypt, and Iraq were burning.

@RayHeard: @realDonaldTrump @bat211 @capetown58 Meanwhile, he’s on the golf course as Egypt, Syria, Iraq burn.What else is new?”

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 18, 2013

On August 28, 2013, the week that rebel forces took full control of Ariha In Idlib Province as well as captured the village of Khanasir, Trump tweeted a reminder that the “freedom fighters” that the US has armed “want to fly planes into our buildings.”

Remember, all these ‘freedom fighters’ in Syria want to fly planes into our buildings.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 28, 2013

The next day, on August 29, 2013, Trump sent out seven tweets involving Syria. The first once again mocked Obama, saying that he wouldn’t attack Syria on the same day of his commemorating the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s ‘I have a dream’ speech.

Why would anyone think Obama would attack Syria the day of his speech in Washington. He doesn’t want to detract from his press & glory.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 29, 2013

This was also the day that British Parliament decided not to take military action.

In the next several tweets, Trump pondered why it needed to be announced at all if we attacked, noting that the element of surprise would be better.

Why do we keep broadcasting when we are going to attack Syria. Why can’t we just be quiet and, if we attack at all, catch them by surprise?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 29, 2013

He also called Obama “stupid.”

@voicelikeariot_: @realDonaldTrump@washingtonpost: Why Obama is giving up the element of surprise in Syria” Perhaps because he is stupid?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 29, 2013

If we are going to continue to be stupid and go into Syria (watch Russia), as they say in the movies, SHOOT FIRST AND TALK LATER!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 29, 2013

The next tweet stated that the Arab League should be dealing with Syria, and if we had to get involved, they should at least be paying for it.

Let the Arab League take care of Syria. Why are these rich Arab countries not paying us for the tremendous cost of such an attack?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 29, 2013

Trump went on to again question what we would get out of intervening in the nation’s affairs, noting the potential for long term conflict, and stated that Obama needed to obtain Congressional approval.

What will we get for bombing Syria besides more debt and a possible long term conflict? Obama needs Congressional approval.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 29, 2013

On August 30, 2013, Obama decided to refrain from attacking until he obtained approval from Congress. The US also deployed their sixth warship to the Mediterranean. Trump responded on Twitter in a series of tweets questioning US leadership.

Is everyone seeing how incompetently our country is being run by watching the mess with Syria? Our leaders don’t know what they are doing!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 30, 2013

He noted that civilian casualties from a US attack would make the nation look “very bad.”

If Obama attacks Syria and innocent civilians are hurt and killed, he and the U.S. will look very bad!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 30, 2013

Again expressing his desire to stay out of Syria.

How bad has our “leader” made us look on Syria. Stay out of Syria, we don’t have the leadership to win wars or even strategize.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 30, 2013

As well as commenting that the US can’t actually afford the cost of an intervention.

@jenconservative: @RKDrake @realDonaldTrump I would be totally surprised if the US even HAS any money to spend on Syria!!” We don’t!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 30, 2013

He also expressed his belief that while the government may be committing atrocities — so are the rebels that the US was funding.

“@Joe1sPro: @realDonaldTrump the president of Syria is killing people inhumanly” But the so called “rebels” may be just as bad (or worse)!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 30, 2013

The next day, August 31, 2013, Obama gave a speech announcing his desire to seek Congressional authorization to intervene in the civil war. He made it clear that he was prepared to give the order for a strike. He claimed intervention was necessary due to chemical attacks — though it was never proven who had launched them. It has been openly questioned by many if the crime was committed by the rebels that the US had armed.

Trump tweeted that all of Obama’s talking has given his targets a chance to prepare.

Syria has prepared for an attack based on all of our “talk” – they have moved targeted ammunition and supplies to new locations.Amazing!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 31, 2013

On the first day of September, 2013, Trump expressed his relief that Obama’s weakness may have been a blessing.

President Obama’s weakness and indecision may have saved us from doing a horrible and very costly (in more ways than money) attack on Syria!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 1, 2013

This was also the day that a Twitter user asked Trump how he would handle the situation if he was president. Trump responded that he would let them fight each other while focusing on the US.

@mguarino64: @realDonaldTrump ” How would you treat the Syria situation if president ?” I’d let them all fight with each other-focus on US!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 1, 2013

Trump again expressed his annoyance with the Arab League.

The Arab League stated that it wants nothing to do with an attack on Syria, but they want us to attack.Are our leaders insane or just stupid

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 2, 2013

As well as with the fact that the administration was being so open with their plans.

We have given Syria so much time and information-there has never been such an instance in wartime history. Syria is now fully prepared!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 2, 2013

The next day, September 2, 2013, Trump again expressed his frustration with the fact that the administration has been so public with their strategies.

@DanScavino: @realDonaldTrump – it’s so bad there are actually maps of targets now in #Syria & where USA ships would attack from.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 2, 2013

If the U.S. attacks Syria and hits the wrong targets, killing civilians, there will be worldwide hell to pay. Stay away and fix broken U.S.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 3, 2013

Think of it, the Arab League doesn’t want to get involved with Syria – but they want us to do their dirty work. How stupid!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 3, 2013

September 3, 2013, he stated that “the great GENERALS MacArthur and Patton, real leaders and fighters, are spinning in their graves as we give Syria info & time to prepare.”

The great GENERALS MacArthur and Patton, real leaders and fighters, are spinning in their graves as we give Syria info & time to prepare.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 4, 2013

He also once again urged the nation to stay out of Syria.

What I am saying is stay out of Syria.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 4, 2013

Again, expressing his outrage over the loss of the element of surprise.

For all of those fools that want to attack Syria, the U.S.has lost the vital element of surprise-so stupid-could be a disaster!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 4, 2013

On September 4, things escalated once again as the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations approved the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against the Government of Syria to Respond to Use of Chemical Weapons. The bill forbid putting boots on the ground, but if passed, would give the president power to take “direct action” and engage in intervention for 90 days. It still needed to pass through the Congress and Senate.

Trump tweeted: “Many Syrian ‘rebels’ are radical Jihadis. Not our friends & supporting them doesn’t serve our national interest. Stay out of Syria!”

Many Syrian ‘rebels’ are radical Jihadis. Not our friends & supporting them doesn’t serve our national interest. Stay out of Syria!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 4, 2013

The next day, on September 5, 2013, Trump tweeted about the infamous “red line” comment made by Obama, and claimed it was the only reason he actually wanted to intervene.

President Obama put himself in a very bad position when he talked about Syria crossing the RED LINE. Amazingly, now he denies he said that!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2013

The only reason President Obama wants to attack Syria is to save face over his very dumb RED LINE statement. Do NOT attack Syria,fix U.S.A.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2013

He also questioned if we should stop Iran’s nuclear capabilities while everyone was focused on Syria.

While everyone is waiting and prepared for us to attack Syria, maybe we should knock the hell out of Iran and their nuclear capabilities?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2013

…and made himself very clear in all-caps.

AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA – IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2013

He also noted that members of the Bush administration shouldn’t even be commenting, since the Iraq War was a “waste of blood and treasure.”

All former Bush administration officials should have zero standing on Syria. Iraq was a waste of blood & treasure.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2013

Trump, even then, worried about needless conflict with Russia.

Russia is sending a fleet of ships to the Mediterranean. Obama’s war in Syria has the potential to widen into a worldwide conflict.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2013

He also expressed concern about terrorists calling themselves rebels, and therefore being armed by the US.

The terrorists in Syria are calling themselves REBELS and getting away with it because our leaders are so completely stupid!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2013

On September 6, 2013, Trump joked that Obama destroy Syria by exporting Obamacare.

If Syria was forced to use Obamacare they would self-destruct without a shot being fired. Obama should sell them that idea!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 6, 2013

Saturday, September 7, 2013, Trump referred to the civil war as a “politician’s war.”

Syria has been given so much time that much of the things we were going to bomb have been moved into civilian areas! A polititian’s war.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 7, 2013

Again, urging Obama to stay out of Syria, telling him to “save your “powder” for another (and more important) day!

President Obama, do not attack Syria. There is no upside and tremendous downside. Save your “powder” for another (and more important) day!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 7, 2013

That Monday, September 9, 2013, the day after rebels, including al-Nusra Front, took control of the historic Christian town of Maalula, Trump continued his rants that we need to stay out and focus on making the US strong and great again.

Don’t attack Syria – an attack that will bring nothing but trouble for the U.S. Focus on making our country strong and great again!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 9, 2013

Continuing to show his anti-needless war stance, he again brought up the failings of the Iraq War.

Iraq has granted Iran full air rights to fly over and arm Syria. What did America accomplish with the Iraq war? And now Syria?!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 9, 2013

September 10, 2013, he noted that the Russians were making the US look bad by playing a “very smart game.”

The Russians are playing a very smart game. In the meantime they are buying lots of time for Syria and making U.S. look foolish. Dangerous!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 10, 2013

At this point, Trump backed off his quest to stay out of Syria, not tweeting the name of the nation again until June 26, 2014. This was the day after the Syrian Air Force killed at least 57 civilians by bombing the Islamic State in Iraq.

Now Syria is bombing Iraq and Secy. Kerry, after we blew the hell out of the place, says please don’t do that. Syria is a front for Iran.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 26, 2014

On August 25, 2014, Trump called it “ironic” that “we will now be helping Syria and Iran by attacking ISIS.” The day before, ISIS forces had captured the Tabqa airbase from the Syrian military.

We will now be helping Syria and Iran by attacking ISIS – ironic, isn’t it!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 25, 2014

On September 4, 2014, Trump stated that “any American who fights w/ ISIS in Iraq or Syria should have their passport revoked. If they try to come back in, send them to Gitmo.”

Any American who fights w/ ISIS in Iraq or Syria should have their passport revoked. If they try to come back in, send them to Gitmo.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 4, 2014

Sixteen days later, on September 20, 2014, he expressed doubt that the US was really sure they were arming “moderate” rebels.

Do you believe that Obama is giving weapons to “moderate rebels” in Syria.Isn’t sure who they are. What the hell is he doing.Will turn on us

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 20, 2014

On September 23, 2014, he mocked the administration for saying that Syria borders Saudi Arabia.

Obama administration said that Saudi Arabia was on Syria’s border http://t.co/s4AI85JHSe Wrong. These are the civilians planning the war.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 23, 2014

On June 15, 2015, Trump announced his candidacy for president, and the live-tweeting of the Syrian Civil War calmed for a while.

On November 4, 2015, Trump quoted Sean Hannity’s tweet about how the US needs to be less predictable when it comes to Syria.

@seanhannity: @realDonaldTrump on sending 50 Special Ops Forces troops to Syria: This country needs to be less predictable.”

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 4, 2015

On November 17, 2015, Trump expressed his concern about the refugees coming from Syria potentially having ties to ISIS.

Refugees from Syria are now pouring into our great country. Who knows who they are – some could be ISIS. Is our president insane?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 17, 2015

March 24, 2016, Trump tweeted that “Europe and the U.S. must immediately stop taking in people from Syria. This will be the destruction of civilization as we know it! So sad!”

Europe and the U.S. must immediately stop taking in people from Syria. This will be the destruction of civilization as we know it! So sad!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 24, 2016

When Russian President Vladimir Putin and Obama failed to make a deal regarding Syria on September 5, 2016, Trump noted that the US president was not a good deal maker.

President Obama & Putin fail to reach deal on Syria – so what else is new? Obama is not a natural deal maker. Only makes bad deals!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2016

Two weeks later, September 19, Trump quoted a tweet about how refugees coming from Syria were not being properly vetted.

@TarukMatuk: @CNN @FoxNews @realDonaldTrump @RogerRice10 Refugees from Syria over 10k plus more coming. Lots young males, poorly vetted.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 19, 2016

A week after that, on September 26, he noted that Hillary Clinton’s interventions around the world, including Syria, were failures.

Hillary Clinton failed all over the world.
?LIBYA
?SYRIA
?IRAN
?IRAQ
?ASIA PIVOT
?RUSSIAN RESET
?BENGHAZI#DebateNight pic.twitter.com/e70AtE6lNR

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 27, 2016

October 4, 2016, he expressed a similar sentiment.

CLINTON’S FLAILING SYRIA POLICY WAS JUDGED A FAILURE:https://t.co/ICZxn7Q3vZ #VPDebate

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 5, 2016

Five days later, on October 9, 2016, Trump called Clinton out on her involvement once again.

FACT ?? on “red line” in Syria: HRC “I wasn’t there.” Fact: line drawn in Aug ’12. HRC Secy of State til Feb ’13. https://t.co/4yZjH3TR5B

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 10, 2016

Getting to the current year, on January 15, he tweeted about the “red line” and “fake news.”

much worse – just look at Syria (red line), Crimea, Ukraine and the build-up of Russian nukes. Not good! Was this the leaker of Fake News?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 16, 2017

On February 12, after his executive order impacting immigration from seven nations, including Syria, Trump tweeted that 72% of refugees came to America from those countries.

72% of refugees admitted into U.S. (2/3 -2/11) during COURT BREAKDOWN are from 7 countries: SYRIA, IRAQ, SOMALIA, IRAN, SUDAN, LIBYA & YEMEN

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 12, 2017

On April 5, 2017, following a chemical attack that reportedly killed at least 72 people, Trump seemed to change his tune, calling the act an “affront to humanity” and asserting that his views on “Syria and the Assad regime have changed.”

Trump refused to say what he would do in response, however, again ridiculing the Obama administration and the military for announcing ahead of time that they intended to recapture Mosul.

Many others have questioned whether or not this was actually the act of another group, like the rebels. It appears questionable that Assad would commit such an atrocity on his own people after the White House had asserted their only goal in Syria was to combat Islamic terrorism, and not enact regime change.

“It makes no sense, even if you were totally separate from this and take no sides of this and you were just an analyst, it doesn’t make sense for Assad under these conditions to all of the sudden use poison gasses. I think it’s zero chance that he would have done this deliberately,” Ron Paul said on Wednesday.

The post Trump’s Syria Tweets Have Been Consistently Anti-Intervention Since 2013, What Happened? appeared first on We Are Change.

Ron Paul: Chemical Attack in Syria May Have Been False Flag by Deep State to Undermine Peace

Posted: 05 Apr 2017 08:19 PM PDT

We Are Change

During Wednesday’s Liberty Report, Ron Paul asserted that he believes there is “zero chance” that the chemical attack in Syria was conducted by Bashar al-Assad.

“Just days after the US Administration changed course on Syrian President Assad, saying he could stay, an alleged chemical weapon attack that killed dozens of civilians has been blamed on the Syrian government,” the description for the stream read. “Did Assad sign his own death warrant with such an attack…or does some other entity benefit?”

The former Texas congressman explained that the timing of the incident was strange, as things were going reasonably well in Syria given the conditions. He noted that Trump had allowed the Syrians to decide who should be running their country, and that peace talks were in the works and terror groups were “on the run.”

“It looks like, maybe, somebody didn’t like that so there had to be an episode, and the blame now is we can’t let that happen because it looks like it might benefit Assad,” Paul asserted.

Paul then referenced the 2013 incident, and the “red line.” He noted that neoconservatives have been “yelling and screaming,” including a portion of the administration, that Assad used poison gas on the Syrian people.

Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity executive director Daniel McAdams chimed in at this point, stating that it was never proven that the attack was conducted by Assad, and that the UN’s Carla Del Ponte had stated the vicious assault was likely conducted by the rebels.

“It makes no sense, even if you were totally separate from this and take no sides of this and you were just an analyst, it doesn’t make sense for Assad under these conditions to all of the sudden use poison gasses. I think it’s zero chance that he would have done this deliberately,” Paul added.

Paul asserted that his viewers need to decide what they stand for, urging them to consider the benefits of negotiation and diplomacy.

“If we give up on that, then we’re going to have the neoconservatives — epitomized by Bill Kristol, Cheney, McCain, and Lindsey Graham — they’re the ones who will be running it. I mean, in many ways they have a lot of influence, they’re closer to the insiders, they’re closer to the deep state,” Paul warned. “This may well be an example of what they can do to reverse any attempt to come up with a peaceful solution.”

Paul stated that is why the message of non interventionism, minding our own business, and having a strong national defense to protect liberty at home is so important.

“That is the policy that must be used if we are determined to promote the cause of peace and prosperity,” Paul concluded.

The post Ron Paul: Chemical Attack in Syria May Have Been False Flag by Deep State to Undermine Peace appeared first on We Are Change.

WATCH: Russian, U.S. And Syria Speaking At UN Emergency Meeting

Posted: 05 Apr 2017 06:40 PM PDT

We Are Change

(WRC) — President Donald Trump’s envoy to the United Nations threatened unilateral U.S. action if the world failed to act.

“There are times in the life of states that we are compelled to take our own action,” Nikki Haley declared.

The U.N. Security Council held an emergency meeting on the recent chemical attack in Syria.

“Terrorists sought to create a pretext for the use of military force against a sovereign State” – Russia Ambassador to the UNSC.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry rejected a draft UNSC resolution condemning the apparent chemical-weapons attack in the Idlib Province of Syria that left several dozen people dead.

Moscow claims that the poison gas belonged to rebels and had leaked from an insurgent weapons storage facility hit by Syrian airstrikes.

Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that the resolution drafted by the United States, Britain, and France was “categorically unacceptable.”

World leaders and officials in other countries, including Britain and Israel, supported the U.S. in saying Assad’s military forces were responsible for the tragedy.

The post WATCH: Russian, U.S. And Syria Speaking At UN Emergency Meeting appeared first on We Are Change.

Missing Brazilian Student Leaves Behind A Scary Room Covered In Coded Texts And Weird Symbols

Posted: 05 Apr 2017 06:02 PM PDT

We Are Change

Bruno Borges, a 24-year-old student from Brazil, reportedly vanished without a trace on March 27th. Still missing, what Borges left behind in his room appears to be a strange secretive project consisting of several thousand pages of mysterious coded texts in books and on the walls, mixed with occult symbols.

(WRC) — Months before disappearing, Bruno Borges told his mother that he was writing 14 books that would change humanity for the better. After receiving a $6,500 donation from his cousin, he was able to finish his secretive project centered around a massive statue of occultist Giordano Bruno worth several thousand dollars.

Giordano Bruno was a philosopher, cosmological theorist, mathematician, and poet of the 16th century known for his esoteric knowledge drawn from Hermetism, Egyptian magic and the Kaballah, in addition to his theories on the universe and non-human intelligent life.

“Giordano Bruno (1548–1600) is regarded among extraterrestrial apologists, secular and occult, as a free-thought martyr. Born in Naples, Bruno was a Catholic priest, Dominican monk, philosopher, hermetist, Kabbalist, mathematician, and astronomer. Influenced by Lucretius, his cosmology went well beyond the Copernican model by proposing that the sun was merely a garden variety star, and moreover, that the universe contained an infinite number of worlds populated by intelligent alien beings. Delving deeply into occult lore, Bruno preferred magical to mathematical reasoning. Bruno’s faith has been described as “an incoherent materialistic pantheism.” Moreover, Bruno argued that his beliefs did not contradict Scripture or true religion. Yet, this begs the question: What did he regard as true religion?

Bruno defined magic as “the knowledge of the science of nature.” Within the renaissance worldview, it was common to merge magic and science because both explore and seek to gain mastery over the structure of the universe. Similarly, religion and magic were conflated because both answered the ultimate questions and offered communion with the divine. Accordingly, for Bruno, magic was the tool for realizing the ends of science and religion. While it seems at odds with the cold, hard, materialist posturing we are accustomed to, naturalist scientists are the heirs apparent to many of the occult traditions.”
– Cris D. Putnam, Giordano Bruno

There’s not much I could say with words to describe this room. I will let the photographs (and video at the bottom of the article) speak for themselves.

Behold:

14 books full of encrypted text and occult/scientific diagrams.

 

In the middle of the room stands this statue of Bruno Giordano, which is worth several thousand dollars.

 

The statue stands on a diagram which appears to be the alchemical symbol of transmutation.

 

A very beautiful painting of Bruno Borges with… what I can only describe as an alien.

All of the text in the books and on the walls is written in a secret code.

The video:

Borges’ parents are apparently stunned by the disappearance of their 24-year-old son.

The student’s shaken businessman father Athos Borges, said he last saw his son when he left their family home in Rio Branco, Acre, without any money after lunch on March 27.

He said the family have received some information, but nothing concrete and nothing that would indicate what has happened.

He told G1.Globo.com : “We’ve tried to call him on his cell phone, but it’s off.

“He’s never gone before. He did not take anything and the last time we saw him he was leaving home.”

Borges mother, Denise Borges, told the Gaucho newspaper that the family had lunch together and that everything seemed fine.

She said: “He was clever. In school he was always different – a born leader with high powers of persuasion.

“He is such a kind-hearted boy.”

Mr and Mrs Borges had just returned from a month-long trip before his disappearance.

While they were away Borges’ sister Gabriela said her brother had isolated himself in his bedroom, which which he always kept locked.

Gabriella says she believes her brother has a “plan” and is working on publishing the 14 handwritten books found in his room.

She said: “We were very worried. Now we think he’s okay. He has a project, which is the publication of these 14 books. I think he had to do it that way.”

The 14 bound manuscripts – each with a Roman numeral on – were found in the room written in the same code as that on the walls.”
The Mirror

Local authorities are investigating the Brazilian student’s disappearance. According to lead investigator Fabrizzio Sobreira, the case will remain confidential.

What do you think it all means? Let us know in the comments.

The post Missing Brazilian Student Leaves Behind A Scary Room Covered In Coded Texts And Weird Symbols appeared first on We Are Change.

False Flag in Syria? Journalists Raise Alarms On Gas Attack

Posted: 05 Apr 2017 01:45 PM PDT

We Are Change

Two prominent journalists with experience on Syria believe the recent gas attack was a false flag – designed to make the Trump administration go to war with Assad.

Sarah Abdallah noticed something strange – that a Syrian reporter for Gulf-based Orient TV tweeted about the attack 24 hours before it took place.

Abdallah translates the reporter’s tweet: “Tomorrow a media campaign will begin to cover intense air raids on the Hama countryside and use of chlorine against civilians.” Another reporter, Mimi Al-Laham, known as Partisan Girl, said, “this shows clear foreknowledge that the rebels were going to stage an attack by Orient TV.”

Wow. This anti-Assad “reporter” tweeted about the sarin attack in #Syria 24 hours before it happened. Still think nothing fishy is going on? pic.twitter.com/xrGWemylFW

— Sarah Abdallah (@sahouraxo) April 5, 2017

Tweet says: “Tomorrow a media campaign will begin to cover intense air raids on the Hama countryside and use of chlorine against civilians”

— Sarah Abdallah (@sahouraxo) April 5, 2017

Al-Laham also reported that The White Helmets, an al-Qaeda affiliated group funded by George Soros and the British government, were responsible for the chemical weapon attack on civilians in the Syrian city of Khan Shaykhun. She goes on to state in another “coincidence” that “250 people were kidnapped by Al-Qaeda last week from the nearby city of Hama, which is the same number as the current body count of wounded and killed civilians.”

Al-Laham further noted that the media’s narrative has quickly changed from “Nerve Agent” to “Sarin” to “Chlorine.” She added that the “media is quick to believe anything without any evidence.” She also exposed one of the media’s sources – a doctor, Shajul Islam, who is facing terror charges for kidnapping and torturing two British journalists in Syria.

The Narrative has shifted, from “Nerve Agent” “Sarin” to “Chlorine Gas”. Media quick to believe anything without evidence. #SyriaGasAttack pic.twitter.com/UBistvBWQO

— Partisangirl (@Partisangirl) April 5, 2017

In another case of “coincidence,” Partisan Girl explains that the White Helmets received sarin-protective respirator suits one month before the attack, despite the Syrian government no longer owning Sarin gas according to OPCW and John Kerry himself as Abdallah points out.

In 2014, Kerry admits that #Syria gave away ALL its chemical weapons. But today we’re supposed to believe that Assad gassed his own people? pic.twitter.com/DT9B9cYyKH

— Sarah Abdallah (@sahouraxo) April 5, 2017

We’ll leave you with a very thought provoking question from the Syrian Deputy Ambassador.

“Who is the beneficiary of chemical attacks? It is the terrorist Forces that seek to topple our govt,” Syrian Deputy Ambassador at UNSC.

“Who is the beneficiary of chemical attacks? It is the #Terrorist Forces that seek to topple our govt” – #Syria Deputy Ambassador at #UNSC pic.twitter.com/Oks6yTE1pC

— Conflict Watch ? (@ConflictWatch1) April 5, 2017

The post False Flag in Syria? Journalists Raise Alarms On Gas Attack appeared first on We Are Change.

SEGREGATION RETURNS: Black Lives Matter Bans White People From Philadelphia Event

Posted: 05 Apr 2017 12:52 PM PDT

We Are Change

In a move that will almost surely further the racial divide in the U.S., Black Lives Matter’s Philadelphia chapter has banned white people from attending one of its up and coming events, stating its a “black only space.”

The Daily Caller reported the group’s April 15 meeting plans to discuss projects for the upcoming year and let people to “meet, strategize and organize.” While children are invited to attend the conference, white people are explicitly banned, according to the Facebook event page.

When people began questioning the ban on whites over Twitter, Black Lives Matter Philly stayed by their ban, explaining that their meetings are “black centered.”

Anyone who identifies as “African disapora” is allowed to attend, the group expressed in a tweet.

“If you identify as a person of the African Diaspora You can attend our meetings and become a member. If not you can support us in other ways,” Philly BLM said in a tweet.

If you identify as a person of the African Diaspora You can attend our meetings and become a member. If not you can support us in other ways https://t.co/GTCkKVC7xV

— BLM Philly (@BLMPhilly) April 3, 2017

Yes https://t.co/m3SSi27Hbk

— BLM Philly (@BLMPhilly) April 3, 2017

One Twitter user “TheRealFooJones” pointed out that Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. worked side by side with whites to accomplish his goal of racial equality. Philly Black Lives Matter responded by saying that was King’s decision. Adding the group’s support for Malcolm X, BLM Philly tweeted that Malcolm X had banned whites from his meetings too.

Malcolm took our same stance. White people could not attend the meetings but could support his organization https://t.co/RyUGClETHJ

— BLM Philly (@BLMPhilly) April 3, 2017

It’s very important to note that white globalist billionaire George Soros funds Black Lives Matter groups and organizers. Soros gave the group $650,000 last year, according to leaked hacked documents by DCLeaks.

Soros is known for causing chaos and leaving any country he touches in ruin, in this case the leaked documents further exposed that Soros’s goal is ultimately racial division or race riots.

One document shows that the Open Society Foundation or OSF saw the killings of Mike Brown, Eric Garner, Walter Scott, and Freddie Gray as an opportunity to implement Soros’s policy goals on federal police guidelines. OSF, according to the documents, then held a meeting titled, Police Reform: How to Take Advantage of the Crisis of the Moment and Drive Long-Term Institutional Change in Police-Community Practice.”

The rising tide of segregation demanded by BLM organizers is a result of a divide and conquer scheme by globalist George Soros. Don’t fall for it – he’s playing Americans against each other to try and dominate all of us.

The post SEGREGATION RETURNS: Black Lives Matter Bans White People From Philadelphia Event appeared first on We Are Change.

Freedom Of Speech Under Attack In UK: Nationalist Reporter Threatened With Arrest For Recording AntiFa

Posted: 05 Apr 2017 12:41 PM PDT

We Are Change

Reporters from Rebel Media were recently threatened with arrest for attempting to do their jobs as journalists and report on a violent Antifa demonstration in the streets of London.

Antifa radicals angrily flooded the streets in reponse to a Britain First rally – which was in response to recent attacks on. The Rebel reporters Tommy Robinson and Caolan Robertson, supporters of the Britain First movement, were attacked and called fascists, racists, and a slew of other cliches by “anti-fascist” radicals before being ordered by police to “go straight to your car.”

When reporter Tommy Robinson asked what this command meant, the officer confirmed that he would be arrested if he didn’t go to his car.

Robinson reported, “After just minutes of Caolan and I arriving, Antifa and United Against Fascism swarmed us, throwing bottles and attacking us.”

 

UK Police have made many arrests for “offensive” posts about the migrants currently flooding the United Kingdom. This type of “hate speech” policing has become rampant in Europe, and was a little-recognized plank of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for President.

Britain First is what Rebel Media describes as a “controversial patriotic group that regularly holds marches against Islamic extremism.” It seems that their ideas have been interpreted some as being anti-Islam, when their social media stories with headlines like: “DESTRUCTION: MUSLIMS ARE DESTROYING PARIS!” are actually targeting radical Islamic terrorism.

It’s not your average Muslim that follows his faith that is the issue according to Britain First, it is the extremist ones who are committing terrorist attacks. As the Britain First website says: “the rapid growth of militant Islam is leading to the suppression of women, freedom of speech and racist attacks.”

 

How are we to justify why Rebel Media reporters were told to leave the scene? As reported by ABC News, 14 people were later arrested at the demonstration. Rebel News claims that all of the people arrested were members of anti-fascist organizations.

For more on this story, watch Tommy Robinson’s report below:

The post Freedom Of Speech Under Attack In UK: Nationalist Reporter Threatened With Arrest For Recording AntiFa appeared first on We Are Change.

You may also like...

Translate »