WE ARE CHANGE MAIL
- REPORT: Sean Hannity, Erik Prince And More Unmasked By John Brennan
- CNN Reporter Dumbfounded After Congressman Questions Syria Attack
- House Intel Chairman Devin Nunes Recuses Himself From Russia Probe Investigation
- Suddenly, Both Obamacare Repeal And Trump Tax Reform Are Dead
- If Trump Is ‘Connected’ To The Russians, Then So Are The Clintons
- White House: ‘The Clock Has Now Run Out’ On North Korea
- After Using Chemical Weapons at Standing Rock, U.S. Slams Syrian Attack
- Trump’s Syria Tweets Have Been Consistently Anti-Intervention Since 2013, What Happened?
- Ron Paul: Chemical Attack in Syria May Have Been False Flag by Deep State to Undermine Peace
- WATCH: Russian, U.S. And Syria Speaking At UN Emergency Meeting
- Missing Brazilian Student Leaves Behind A Scary Room Covered In Coded Texts And Weird Symbols
- False Flag in Syria? Journalists Raise Alarms On Gas Attack
- SEGREGATION RETURNS: Black Lives Matter Bans White People From Philadelphia Event
- Freedom Of Speech Under Attack In UK: Nationalist Reporter Threatened With Arrest For Recording AntiFa
|REPORT: Sean Hannity, Erik Prince And More Unmasked By John Brennan
Posted: 06 Apr 2017 10:53 AM PDT
GotNews has reported that Fox News’ Sean Hannity and Blackwater founder, Erik Prince were spied on and unmasked by the Obama administration’s own John Brennan.
GotNews’ Chuck Johnson went on to explain the feuding history of Brennan and General Flynn.
Going further than the spying on Trump supporters by the former CIA director, a CIA whistleblower has alleged that Brennan also spied on Supreme Court Justices, government employees, judges, businessmen and more.
Then there is the prior spying on the Senate when the CIA got caught not only surveilling Senators, but they hacked into Senate computers when the Senate Intelligence Committee was preparing its damning report on the C.I.A.’s detention and interrogation program.
“As far as the allegations of, you know, CIA hacking into, you know, Senate computers, nothing could be further from the truth. I mean we wouldn’t do that. I mean, that’s just beyond the – you know, the scope of reason in terms of what we would do,” Brennan said.
If Brennan is found to be guilty of surveilling people connected to Trump domestically and surveilling judges, Supreme Court Justices, government employees and businessmen he may have a whole lot of other problems coming his way.
The post REPORT: Sean Hannity, Erik Prince And More Unmasked By John Brennan appeared first on We Are Change.
|CNN Reporter Dumbfounded After Congressman Questions Syria Attack
Posted: 06 Apr 2017 10:46 AM PDT
CNN anchor Kate Bolduan was left dumbfounded during a televised interview with congressman Thomas Massie in which he questioned the mainstream narrative that Bashar al-Assad attacked his own people with chemical weapons.
The CNN reporter was left speechless as she was questioned on the complicated situation that is Syria.
“It’s hard to know exactly what’s happening in Syria right now. I’d like to know specifically how that release of chemical gas, if it did occur — and it looks like it did — how that occurred,” Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie told CNN’s Kate Bolduan.
He continued to express his uncertainty regarding the attacks, questioning the motive of why Assad would suddenly attack his own people.
A sentiment shared by the Syrian Deputy Ambassador at the UN Security Council and two prominent journalists with knowledge on Syria.
“Who is the beneficiary of chemical attacks? It is the terrorist Forces that seek to topple our govt,” Syrian Deputy Ambassador at UNSC said.
Massie proceeded to answer her question before the CNN anchorwoman cut him off and asked him if he was stating that he believes what the Russians are saying that Assad had nothing to do with the attack and that the attack was simply just chemicals stored in an ammunition depot.
However, the lawmaker stuck to his guns, reiterating his earlier position to Bolduan:
“I don’t think it would’ve served Assad’s purposes to do a chemical attack on his people…It’s hard for me to understand why he would do that — if he did,” Massie said.
If Bolduan was a good journalist like Seymore Hersh, that didn’t just read off a teleprompter, but thought for herself, she would know that contrary to popular belief, rebels in the region have been caught numerous times years prior gassing their own people and were even condemned by a UN official.
In the infamous 2013 gas attack, UN official Del Ponte said that evidence pointed that the rebels used sarin gas.
Then there is a UN report that states that Al-Tamanah on the night of April 29-30, 2014 might well have been staged by rebels and then played up by activists through social media.
“Seven witnesses stated that frequent alerts about an imminent chlorine weapons attack by the government had been issued, but in fact no incidents with chemicals took place,” the U.N. report stated. “While people sought safety after the warnings, their homes were looted and rumours spread that the events were being staged. … They these witnesses had come forward to contest the widespread false media reports.”
Then, in 2016 Syria handed over evidence to an international watchdog organization reportedly proving rebels used mustard gas against civilians.
Syrian authorities gave documents and samples evincing the use of mustard gas by rebels to the mission of the Technical Secretariat of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW.)
Further, they stated that in January of this year the samples would be delivered to the Hague.
So, to rehash the question by the Syrian Deputy Ambassador and Rep Thomas Massie: why would Syria’s Assad gas his own people when only a few months ago he handed documents that proved rebels gassed civilians to a watchdog group and the Hague?
It’s also worth noting that Massie voted against the 2014 intervention into Syria. An excellent question to ask the rebels is “why haven’t you caught any of these horrendous attacks on video but you somehow capture the aftermath?”
The post CNN Reporter Dumbfounded After Congressman Questions Syria Attack appeared first on We Are Change.
|House Intel Chairman Devin Nunes Recuses Himself From Russia Probe Investigation
Posted: 06 Apr 2017 07:56 AM PDT
House Rep. Devin Nunes (R) has recently stated that he is no longer going to be involved in the Russian probe investigation which revealed unmasking and surveillance on the Trump administration. He has issued a statement on the matter to the media:
These “false claims” that Nunes is talking about is the question of whether or not he disclosed classified information to the public. On March 22, Nunes claimed that Trump and his associates were “incidentally” swept up by domestic intelligence communities, surveilled, and then unmasked in the corresponding documents picked up by intelligence communities. He then went on to brief President Trump on his findings. Trump followed up by saying he was “somewhat” vindicated by Nunes’ briefing.
Now, it looks like we won’t see Devin Nunes’ name on the headlines talking about this topic anymore, as it seems he wants to disassociate himself with this discussion. As a member of the House of Representatives, surely this isn’t his first time being attacked by leftist groups, so why give up now?
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has responded to this news by issuing a statement of his own:
For more in Nunes’ original claims in the investigation, watch the below video:
The post House Intel Chairman Devin Nunes Recuses Himself From Russia Probe Investigation appeared first on We Are Change.
|Suddenly, Both Obamacare Repeal And Trump Tax Reform Are Dead
Posted: 06 Apr 2017 01:52 AM PDT
Article via Zero Hedge
It was a one-two knockout punch for anyone still holding out hope that Trump’s domestic economic policies will take place in the near, or not even so near, future.
First, Rep. Patrick McHenry, a member of House Republican leadership, said on Wednesday afternoon that conservatives’ proposals to reach a compromise on healthcare are a “bridge too far” to win support from colleagues. McHenry, the chief deputy whip, told reporters that calls from the conservative House Freedom Caucus to allow states to apply for waivers to repeal ObamaCare protections for people with pre-existing conditions are a “bridge too far for our members” and can’t get enough votes to pass.
The comments come after a late-night meeting among House GOP groups on Tuesday fell flat, and lawmakers appear to be heading home at the end of the week for a recess without any tangible progress toward a deal to revive their healthcare bill.
McHenry said lawmakers need a “cooling off period” over the two-week break. “We need people to stop, take a deep breath, and think through the way to yes,” he said.
As McClathy sums it up, “conservative interest groups are on the warpath, charging the new ideas don’t go far enough to destroy the 7-year-old Affordable Care Act. On the other end of the GOP political divide, moderate House Republicans are withholding support for the new White House-backed changes. They fear the revisions would jeopardize the health law’s requirement that individual insurers cover people with pre-existing medical conditions.”
And so on, as the blame game has resumed. In other words, despite the White House’s stated desire to get a vote off by Friday, Obamacare repeal is dead for the foreseeable future.
* * *
And then it weas Ryan’s turn: the House Speaker, also on Wednesday afternoon, said that tax reform will take longer to accomplish than repealing and replacing Obamacare would, saying Congress and the White House were initially closer to agreement on healthcare legislation than on tax policy.
“The House has a (tax reform) plan but the Senate doesn’t quite have one yet. They’re working on one. The White House hasn’t nailed it down,” Ryan told an audience in Washington.
“So even the three entities aren’t on the same page yet on tax reform,” he added.
Translation: both healthcare and tax reform are now indefinitely dead, which means that a suddenly pivoting Trump, who earlier today said he had “changed his mind” on Syria, may have no choice but to begin war with Assad to distract from everything else that is going on in the US.
This article first appeared on ZeroHedge.com and was authored by Tyler Durden.
The post Suddenly, Both Obamacare Repeal And Trump Tax Reform Are Dead appeared first on We Are Change.
|If Trump Is ‘Connected’ To The Russians, Then So Are The Clintons
Posted: 06 Apr 2017 01:43 AM PDT
If Hillary Clinton ended up winning the presidency, do you think that there would have been allegations of Russian election tampering, or subsequent allegations by the mainstream media of Trump actually having ties to the Russians? Probably not. Why?
Could it be because the Clintons are also connected to the Russians? Yes! They’re ALL connected! And so, had she won, the last thing she would have done is gone after Trump. Not just because she won and there would have been no reason to attempt to undermine his presidency, but because she and her family also rub elbows with the Russians.
And you know what’s strange, Russian multinationals are by and large no different than US multinationals, the only difference is the flag. They’re all the same. Profits over people.
So, when it comes down to it, all the media is really doing is playing off the stigma that comes with “Russia”, and accusing Trump of being some kind of pro-Russian sell out. He’s not a pro-Russian sell out, he’s just a sell out. Just like Hillary, Bill, Obama, Dubyah and the whole lot! Pick a country, any country; he’ll build there and establish the necessary political ties. Why is this so surprising? The oligarchs and billionaire class do this all around the world. The only difference is that if you do it in Russia, then suddenly you’re a double agent of sorts
As the Voltaire saying goes, “When it is a question of money, everybody is of the same religion.” Well, the same goes for nationality. I’m by no means defending Trump, he’s just being a shameless and ruthless capitalist, just like the Clintons and all the rest of them.
It would be one thing if Trump’s ties to Russia were very political, in the sense that his goal is to actually serve the national interest of the Russian government, or even worse, their military. However, he’s just being an opportunist, and Russia just happens to have 77 billionaires. And guess who else cashes in on Russian billionaires, the Clintons. What do ya know!
With that being said, while the mainstream media goes full force with regard to picking apart Trump’s financial ties to Russia, do you really think they would have done the same had Clinton won? Because one thing’s for sure, the Clintons have been courting Russian oligarchs for well over a decade, even to the point of involving the Clinton state department.
In emails first obtained by the conservative group Citizens United, the Clinton Foundation staff asked the state department, and was ultimately given the go ahead, to invite Russian billionaire Viktor Veselberg — who has donated at least $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation — to meet with Clinton’s state department.
And the Clinton’s Russian ties go deeper. The wife of Russian billionaire Leonard Blavatnik, Emily Blavatanik, has donated $33,400 to the Democratic Party, and most recently gave the maximum donation for an individual, $2,700, to Hillary Clinton during her presidential campaign. And the same goes for Daria Zhukova, wife of billionaire oil magnate Roman Abramovich, who also donated $2,700 to Clinton’s campaign. It should be noted that Roman Abramovich is a notorious Putin ally. And speaking of former KGB agents (Putin), billionaire Gennady Timchenko, who is widely rumored to have a KGB past and is believed to be part of Putin’s so called “politburo”, acquired several holdings of Clinton donor Tom Steyer’s hedge fund in 2010.
And then there’s John Podesta and his brother, Tony, who founded the lobbying firm the Podesta Group, a firm which in 2016 lobbied on behalf of Sberbank, which is owned by the Russian Central Bank. Why is this significant? Because John Podesta was also Clinton’s campaign manager.
According to the Observer:
The post If Trump Is ‘Connected’ To The Russians, Then So Are The Clintons appeared first on We Are Change.
|White House: ‘The Clock Has Now Run Out’ On North Korea
Posted: 06 Apr 2017 01:32 AM PDT
The rhetoric is seen more as a message to China than a practical threat to North Korea.
Article via Antiwar
The US has been talking up the idea of “all options” being on the table against North Korea, unilateral military attacks in particular, for weeks now, and appears to be stepping up that narrative again this week, declaring that “the clock has now run out” on North Korea.
It’s not clear this actually means imminent US action, or even that such action is likely at all, because these comments are coming just days ahead of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to the US to meet with President Trump, and in that context, this is seen more as a message to China than a practical threat to North Korea.
The Trump Administration’s position on North Korea from the start has been that China has “enormous” influence and could resolve the situation more or less trivially. China agreed to cut off coal imports as a nod to US calls to “do something” against North Korea, but since then have tried to get the US to countenance some sort of diplomatic effort with a negotiated settlement.
But despite “all options are on the table,” being a phrase the administration has eagerly picked up from its predecessors, it’s not true, because several top officials have made clear diplomacy is no longer being considered at all.
Indeed, if there is one message the administration has tried to get over beyond demanding China do something, it’s that past attempts at diplomacy are to blame for the US not having already imposed a military solution on North Korea.
This article first appeared on Antiwar.com and was authored by Jason Ditz.
The post White House: ‘The Clock Has Now Run Out’ On North Korea appeared first on We Are Change.
|After Using Chemical Weapons at Standing Rock, U.S. Slams Syrian Attack
Posted: 06 Apr 2017 01:24 AM PDT
Politicians around the world are rightly condemning the recent suspected chemical weapons attack in Syria that killed dozens of civilians, including children — even if their finger pointing at President Bashar al-Assad lacks conclusive evidence to support their confident accusations.
Regardless of who was responsible for the gruesome attack, however, the politicians condemning the carnage most vehemently have little ground to stand on considering their perceived authority stems from a government guilty of using chemical weapons.
The use of chemical and biological weapons in warfare was banned after World War I — a prohibition that was reaffirmed in 1972 and again in 1993. Tear gas, which is recognized as a chemical weapon, was included in the 1993 ban, but the final agreement allowed governments to use it domestically for riot control.
American police have used it to suppress protests for decades. Though the vast majority of protesters at the Dakota Access Pipeline demonstrations in Standing Rock, North Dakota, were peaceful, law enforcement sprayed them with the chemical weapon, anyway. Though tear gas is a relatively mild chemical weapon compared to sarin gas, it can cause severe adverse health effects. A reputed U.N. lawyer forcefully condemned its use, along with other heavy-handed police tactics. Few American lawmakers came to their defense.
U.S. law enforcement also deployed tear gas against black civil rights protesters in the 1960s and officers have continued to do so at protests against police brutality in recent years. But the government has used far worse chemical weapons than tear gas.
The United States military used Agent Orange to destroy the opposition in its ill-fated war against Vietnam (it also used napalm extensively, a chemical that, when mixed with gasoline and bombs, amplifies explosions and poisons the air).
“U.S. planes sprayed some 11 million to 13 million gallons of Agent Orange in Vietnam between January 1965 and April 1970” to destroy foliage the Vietcong used for cover, History.com has noted. To this day, Vietnamese individuals suffer the consequences of the United States’ weaponization of the chemical herbicide and defoliant. Between 2.1 and 4.5 million Vietnamese lived in regions sprayed with the chemical, and its remnants remain in the soil.
One of the active ingredients, dioxin, “has been shown to be highly toxic even in minute doses; human exposure to the chemical could be associated with serious health issues such as muscular dysfunction, inflammation, birth defects, nervous system disorders and even the development of various cancers.”
Though some might dispute the notion that Agent Orange, supplied to the U.S. military by Monsanto, Dow Chemical, and other corporations, is actually a chemical weapon, there is little technical doubt. Both herbicides and defoliants are considered chemicals, meaning when they are intentionally used in warfare, they are chemical weapons. Perhaps the biggest difference between the two chemicals is that nerve gas kills victims almost immediately whereas Agent Orange often leads to diseases that take lives over time.
According to Vietnamese officials, Agent Orange has killed or maimed as many as 400,000 people.
Further, a 2001 study that investigated the effects of Agent Orange on the reproductive systems of Vietnamese women described the use of the toxic herbicide as “chemical warfare” that had dire effects, including miscarriages, premature births, and “congenital malformations or developed disabilities within the first years of life” among ? of babies born to parents exposed to it.
To this day, the U.S. military is paying out settlements to thousands of veterans who were negatively affected by the chemical and, like Vietnamese parents, passed the damage down to their children. The military’s own website acknowledges Agent Orange may be responsible for various cancers, including Leukemia, as well Parkinson’s disease, heart disease, and birth defects in offspring.
Unsurprisingly, when the chemical weapons ban was reaffirmed in 1972, the United States insisted that herbicides should not be included and that their use did not constitute chemical warfare.
In the 1980s, the CIA reportedly knew Saddam Hussein was using chemical weapons in his U.S.-backed war with Iran. But the U.S. government did nothing to stop him — in one instance, they helped advance an attack against Iran knowing Hussein was using banned sarin and mustard as weaponry.
The United States is not the only Western power that has employed treacherous chemical weapons in warfare. As The Guardian has pointed out, Great Britain also unleashed them in their fight against the Bolsheviks in World War I and in Gaza in 1917. Historical hero Winston Churchill also insisted on using them against “rebellious” tribes in India. “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes,” he said in a secret memo. France and Germany also used nonlethal chemical weapons in World War I — around the same time Western colonial powers were seeking to dominate and partition the Middle East, including Syria.
The West is now categorically condemning the chemical attack in Syria.
Notably, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also quickly denounced the recent chemical attack in Syria, saying, “When I saw pictures of babies suffocating from a chemical attack in Syria, I was shocked and outraged. There’s no, none, no excuse whatsoever for the deliberate attacks on civilians and on children, especially with cruel and outlawed chemical weapons.”
Conveniently absent from his condemnation was any acknowledgment that the Israeli government has used chemical weapons. In 2009, a Human Rights Watch report declared Israel had knowingly released white phosphorus on civilian populations in Gaza. As the Guardiansummarized:
“In a 71-page report, the rights group said the repeated use of air-burst white phosphorus artillery shells in populated areas of Gaza was not incidental or accidental, but revealed ‘a pattern or policy of conduct.’”
The Israel government initially denied using chemical weapons, only to later admit they had. They asserted they were used in accordance with international law and had not targeted civilians.
Regardless, as the media continues to direct its hysteria at the Syrians tragically suffering in Syria, politicians are aiming to claim the moral high ground — if not blame Assad without conclusive evidence — cobbling together a strategy to push for his removal from power. Though last week the Trump administration said regime-change in Syria would no longer be a U.S. foreign policy goal, following the attack on Tuesday the president said his “attitude toward Assad and Syria has changed very much.” He has not indicated whether he intends to impose more military force.
As this feeding frenzy wears on, beware moral grandstanders in public office who will undoubtedly neglect to acknowledge the carnage their own government’s chemical weapons have imposed on civilians over the course of the last century, all while they continue to advocate further war and intervention in 2017.
Indeed, bombs kill civilians just as easily as chemical weapons do, and while Western politicians may neglect their own countries’ histories to condemn their political opponents, their own bombs are wiping out civilians just as easily as sarin gas.
The post After Using Chemical Weapons at Standing Rock, U.S. Slams Syrian Attack appeared first on We Are Change.
|Trump’s Syria Tweets Have Been Consistently Anti-Intervention Since 2013, What Happened?
Posted: 05 Apr 2017 11:52 PM PDT
As the globalist neoconservatives and former “anti-war” liberals bang the drums of war with Syria, President Donald Trump appeared to change his previously anti-intervention tone on Wednesday — much to the dismay of many of his supporters.
For the past four years, Trump has repeatedly demanded that the US stay out of Syria, so…
Here is a timeline of all of his tweets containing the word “Syria” since May, 2013:
On May 27, 2013, five days after the US Senate panel backed arming the rebels, Trump tweeted a question as to why Senator John McCain was in Syria — as well as what became his campaign slogan.
Two days later, on May 29, 2013, Trump tweeted, “Obama wants to unilaterally put a no-fly zone in Syria to protect Al Qaeda Islamists,” and stated that “Syria is NOT our problem.”
On June 15, 2013, the day after the US announced increased “military support” to rebels, Trump tweeted that they are as bad as the current regime — and that we should stay out of Syria. He also expressed his non interventionist “America first” policy by noting that we would gain nothing from what would cost billions of dollars, as well as our citizen’s lives.
On August 18, 2013, Trump quoted a tweet that mocked then-President Barack Obama for golfing as Syria, Egypt, and Iraq were burning.
On August 28, 2013, the week that rebel forces took full control of Ariha In Idlib Province as well as captured the village of Khanasir, Trump tweeted a reminder that the “freedom fighters” that the US has armed “want to fly planes into our buildings.”
The next day, on August 29, 2013, Trump sent out seven tweets involving Syria. The first once again mocked Obama, saying that he wouldn’t attack Syria on the same day of his commemorating the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s ‘I have a dream’ speech.
This was also the day that British Parliament decided not to take military action.
In the next several tweets, Trump pondered why it needed to be announced at all if we attacked, noting that the element of surprise would be better.
He also called Obama “stupid.”
The next tweet stated that the Arab League should be dealing with Syria, and if we had to get involved, they should at least be paying for it.
Trump went on to again question what we would get out of intervening in the nation’s affairs, noting the potential for long term conflict, and stated that Obama needed to obtain Congressional approval.
On August 30, 2013, Obama decided to refrain from attacking until he obtained approval from Congress. The US also deployed their sixth warship to the Mediterranean. Trump responded on Twitter in a series of tweets questioning US leadership.
He noted that civilian casualties from a US attack would make the nation look “very bad.”
Again expressing his desire to stay out of Syria.
As well as commenting that the US can’t actually afford the cost of an intervention.
He also expressed his belief that while the government may be committing atrocities — so are the rebels that the US was funding.
The next day, August 31, 2013, Obama gave a speech announcing his desire to seek Congressional authorization to intervene in the civil war. He made it clear that he was prepared to give the order for a strike. He claimed intervention was necessary due to chemical attacks — though it was never proven who had launched them. It has been openly questioned by many if the crime was committed by the rebels that the US had armed.
Trump tweeted that all of Obama’s talking has given his targets a chance to prepare.
On the first day of September, 2013, Trump expressed his relief that Obama’s weakness may have been a blessing.
This was also the day that a Twitter user asked Trump how he would handle the situation if he was president. Trump responded that he would let them fight each other while focusing on the US.
Trump again expressed his annoyance with the Arab League.
As well as with the fact that the administration was being so open with their plans.
The next day, September 2, 2013, Trump again expressed his frustration with the fact that the administration has been so public with their strategies.
September 3, 2013, he stated that “the great GENERALS MacArthur and Patton, real leaders and fighters, are spinning in their graves as we give Syria info & time to prepare.”
He also once again urged the nation to stay out of Syria.
Again, expressing his outrage over the loss of the element of surprise.
On September 4, things escalated once again as the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations approved the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against the Government of Syria to Respond to Use of Chemical Weapons. The bill forbid putting boots on the ground, but if passed, would give the president power to take “direct action” and engage in intervention for 90 days. It still needed to pass through the Congress and Senate.
Trump tweeted: “Many Syrian ‘rebels’ are radical Jihadis. Not our friends & supporting them doesn’t serve our national interest. Stay out of Syria!”
The next day, on September 5, 2013, Trump tweeted about the infamous “red line” comment made by Obama, and claimed it was the only reason he actually wanted to intervene.
He also questioned if we should stop Iran’s nuclear capabilities while everyone was focused on Syria.
…and made himself very clear in all-caps.
He also noted that members of the Bush administration shouldn’t even be commenting, since the Iraq War was a “waste of blood and treasure.”
Trump, even then, worried about needless conflict with Russia.
He also expressed concern about terrorists calling themselves rebels, and therefore being armed by the US.
On September 6, 2013, Trump joked that Obama destroy Syria by exporting Obamacare.
Saturday, September 7, 2013, Trump referred to the civil war as a “politician’s war.”
Again, urging Obama to stay out of Syria, telling him to “save your “powder” for another (and more important) day!
That Monday, September 9, 2013, the day after rebels, including al-Nusra Front, took control of the historic Christian town of Maalula, Trump continued his rants that we need to stay out and focus on making the US strong and great again.
Continuing to show his anti-needless war stance, he again brought up the failings of the Iraq War.
September 10, 2013, he noted that the Russians were making the US look bad by playing a “very smart game.”
At this point, Trump backed off his quest to stay out of Syria, not tweeting the name of the nation again until June 26, 2014. This was the day after the Syrian Air Force killed at least 57 civilians by bombing the Islamic State in Iraq.
On August 25, 2014, Trump called it “ironic” that “we will now be helping Syria and Iran by attacking ISIS.” The day before, ISIS forces had captured the Tabqa airbase from the Syrian military.
On September 4, 2014, Trump stated that “any American who fights w/ ISIS in Iraq or Syria should have their passport revoked. If they try to come back in, send them to Gitmo.”
Sixteen days later, on September 20, 2014, he expressed doubt that the US was really sure they were arming “moderate” rebels.
On September 23, 2014, he mocked the administration for saying that Syria borders Saudi Arabia.
On June 15, 2015, Trump announced his candidacy for president, and the live-tweeting of the Syrian Civil War calmed for a while.
On November 4, 2015, Trump quoted Sean Hannity’s tweet about how the US needs to be less predictable when it comes to Syria.
On November 17, 2015, Trump expressed his concern about the refugees coming from Syria potentially having ties to ISIS.
March 24, 2016, Trump tweeted that “Europe and the U.S. must immediately stop taking in people from Syria. This will be the destruction of civilization as we know it! So sad!”
When Russian President Vladimir Putin and Obama failed to make a deal regarding Syria on September 5, 2016, Trump noted that the US president was not a good deal maker.
Two weeks later, September 19, Trump quoted a tweet about how refugees coming from Syria were not being properly vetted.
A week after that, on September 26, he noted that Hillary Clinton’s interventions around the world, including Syria, were failures.
October 4, 2016, he expressed a similar sentiment.
Five days later, on October 9, 2016, Trump called Clinton out on her involvement once again.
Getting to the current year, on January 15, he tweeted about the “red line” and “fake news.”
On February 12, after his executive order impacting immigration from seven nations, including Syria, Trump tweeted that 72% of refugees came to America from those countries.
On April 5, 2017, following a chemical attack that reportedly killed at least 72 people, Trump seemed to change his tune, calling the act an “affront to humanity” and asserting that his views on “Syria and the Assad regime have changed.”
Trump refused to say what he would do in response, however, again ridiculing the Obama administration and the military for announcing ahead of time that they intended to recapture Mosul.
Many others have questioned whether or not this was actually the act of another group, like the rebels. It appears questionable that Assad would commit such an atrocity on his own people after the White House had asserted their only goal in Syria was to combat Islamic terrorism, and not enact regime change.
“It makes no sense, even if you were totally separate from this and take no sides of this and you were just an analyst, it doesn’t make sense for Assad under these conditions to all of the sudden use poison gasses. I think it’s zero chance that he would have done this deliberately,” Ron Paul said on Wednesday.
The post Trump’s Syria Tweets Have Been Consistently Anti-Intervention Since 2013, What Happened? appeared first on We Are Change.
|Ron Paul: Chemical Attack in Syria May Have Been False Flag by Deep State to Undermine Peace
Posted: 05 Apr 2017 08:19 PM PDT
During Wednesday’s Liberty Report, Ron Paul asserted that he believes there is “zero chance” that the chemical attack in Syria was conducted by Bashar al-Assad.
The former Texas congressman explained that the timing of the incident was strange, as things were going reasonably well in Syria given the conditions. He noted that Trump had allowed the Syrians to decide who should be running their country, and that peace talks were in the works and terror groups were “on the run.”
“It looks like, maybe, somebody didn’t like that so there had to be an episode, and the blame now is we can’t let that happen because it looks like it might benefit Assad,” Paul asserted.
Paul then referenced the 2013 incident, and the “red line.” He noted that neoconservatives have been “yelling and screaming,” including a portion of the administration, that Assad used poison gas on the Syrian people.
Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity executive director Daniel McAdams chimed in at this point, stating that it was never proven that the attack was conducted by Assad, and that the UN’s Carla Del Ponte had stated the vicious assault was likely conducted by the rebels.
“It makes no sense, even if you were totally separate from this and take no sides of this and you were just an analyst, it doesn’t make sense for Assad under these conditions to all of the sudden use poison gasses. I think it’s zero chance that he would have done this deliberately,” Paul added.
Paul asserted that his viewers need to decide what they stand for, urging them to consider the benefits of negotiation and diplomacy.
Paul stated that is why the message of non interventionism, minding our own business, and having a strong national defense to protect liberty at home is so important.
“That is the policy that must be used if we are determined to promote the cause of peace and prosperity,” Paul concluded.
The post Ron Paul: Chemical Attack in Syria May Have Been False Flag by Deep State to Undermine Peace appeared first on We Are Change.
|WATCH: Russian, U.S. And Syria Speaking At UN Emergency Meeting
Posted: 05 Apr 2017 06:40 PM PDT
(WRC) — President Donald Trump’s envoy to the United Nations threatened unilateral U.S. action if the world failed to act.
The U.N. Security Council held an emergency meeting on the recent chemical attack in Syria.
Russia’s Foreign Ministry rejected a draft UNSC resolution condemning the apparent chemical-weapons attack in the Idlib Province of Syria that left several dozen people dead.
Moscow claims that the poison gas belonged to rebels and had leaked from an insurgent weapons storage facility hit by Syrian airstrikes.
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that the resolution drafted by the United States, Britain, and France was “categorically unacceptable.”
World leaders and officials in other countries, including Britain and Israel, supported the U.S. in saying Assad’s military forces were responsible for the tragedy.
The post WATCH: Russian, U.S. And Syria Speaking At UN Emergency Meeting appeared first on We Are Change.
|Missing Brazilian Student Leaves Behind A Scary Room Covered In Coded Texts And Weird Symbols
Posted: 05 Apr 2017 06:02 PM PDT
Bruno Borges, a 24-year-old student from Brazil, reportedly vanished without a trace on March 27th. Still missing, what Borges left behind in his room appears to be a strange secretive project consisting of several thousand pages of mysterious coded texts in books and on the walls, mixed with occult symbols.
(WRC) — Months before disappearing, Bruno Borges told his mother that he was writing 14 books that would change humanity for the better. After receiving a $6,500 donation from his cousin, he was able to finish his secretive project centered around a massive statue of occultist Giordano Bruno worth several thousand dollars.
Giordano Bruno was a philosopher, cosmological theorist, mathematician, and poet of the 16th century known for his esoteric knowledge drawn from Hermetism, Egyptian magic and the Kaballah, in addition to his theories on the universe and non-human intelligent life.
There’s not much I could say with words to describe this room. I will let the photographs (and video at the bottom of the article) speak for themselves.
Borges’ parents are apparently stunned by the disappearance of their 24-year-old son.
Local authorities are investigating the Brazilian student’s disappearance. According to lead investigator Fabrizzio Sobreira, the case will remain confidential.
What do you think it all means? Let us know in the comments.
The post Missing Brazilian Student Leaves Behind A Scary Room Covered In Coded Texts And Weird Symbols appeared first on We Are Change.
|False Flag in Syria? Journalists Raise Alarms On Gas Attack
Posted: 05 Apr 2017 01:45 PM PDT
Two prominent journalists with experience on Syria believe the recent gas attack was a false flag – designed to make the Trump administration go to war with Assad.
Sarah Abdallah noticed something strange – that a Syrian reporter for Gulf-based Orient TV tweeted about the attack 24 hours before it took place.
Abdallah translates the reporter’s tweet: “Tomorrow a media campaign will begin to cover intense air raids on the Hama countryside and use of chlorine against civilians.” Another reporter, Mimi Al-Laham, known as Partisan Girl, said, “this shows clear foreknowledge that the rebels were going to stage an attack by Orient TV.”
Al-Laham also reported that The White Helmets, an al-Qaeda affiliated group funded by George Soros and the British government, were responsible for the chemical weapon attack on civilians in the Syrian city of Khan Shaykhun. She goes on to state in another “coincidence” that “250 people were kidnapped by Al-Qaeda last week from the nearby city of Hama, which is the same number as the current body count of wounded and killed civilians.”
Al-Laham further noted that the media’s narrative has quickly changed from “Nerve Agent” to “Sarin” to “Chlorine.” She added that the “media is quick to believe anything without any evidence.” She also exposed one of the media’s sources – a doctor, Shajul Islam, who is facing terror charges for kidnapping and torturing two British journalists in Syria.
In another case of “coincidence,” Partisan Girl explains that the White Helmets received sarin-protective respirator suits one month before the attack, despite the Syrian government no longer owning Sarin gas according to OPCW and John Kerry himself as Abdallah points out.
We’ll leave you with a very thought provoking question from the Syrian Deputy Ambassador.
“Who is the beneficiary of chemical attacks? It is the terrorist Forces that seek to topple our govt,” Syrian Deputy Ambassador at UNSC.
The post False Flag in Syria? Journalists Raise Alarms On Gas Attack appeared first on We Are Change.
|SEGREGATION RETURNS: Black Lives Matter Bans White People From Philadelphia Event
Posted: 05 Apr 2017 12:52 PM PDT
In a move that will almost surely further the racial divide in the U.S., Black Lives Matter’s Philadelphia chapter has banned white people from attending one of its up and coming events, stating its a “black only space.”
The Daily Caller reported the group’s April 15 meeting plans to discuss projects for the upcoming year and let people to “meet, strategize and organize.” While children are invited to attend the conference, white people are explicitly banned, according to the Facebook event page.
When people began questioning the ban on whites over Twitter, Black Lives Matter Philly stayed by their ban, explaining that their meetings are “black centered.”
Anyone who identifies as “African disapora” is allowed to attend, the group expressed in a tweet.
“If you identify as a person of the African Diaspora You can attend our meetings and become a member. If not you can support us in other ways,” Philly BLM said in a tweet.
One Twitter user “TheRealFooJones” pointed out that Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. worked side by side with whites to accomplish his goal of racial equality. Philly Black Lives Matter responded by saying that was King’s decision. Adding the group’s support for Malcolm X, BLM Philly tweeted that Malcolm X had banned whites from his meetings too.
It’s very important to note that white globalist billionaire George Soros funds Black Lives Matter groups and organizers. Soros gave the group $650,000 last year, according to leaked hacked documents by DCLeaks.
Soros is known for causing chaos and leaving any country he touches in ruin, in this case the leaked documents further exposed that Soros’s goal is ultimately racial division or race riots.
One document shows that the Open Society Foundation or OSF saw the killings of Mike Brown, Eric Garner, Walter Scott, and Freddie Gray as an opportunity to implement Soros’s policy goals on federal police guidelines. OSF, according to the documents, then held a meeting titled, Police Reform: How to Take Advantage of the Crisis of the Moment and Drive Long-Term Institutional Change in Police-Community Practice.”
The rising tide of segregation demanded by BLM organizers is a result of a divide and conquer scheme by globalist George Soros. Don’t fall for it – he’s playing Americans against each other to try and dominate all of us.
The post SEGREGATION RETURNS: Black Lives Matter Bans White People From Philadelphia Event appeared first on We Are Change.
|Freedom Of Speech Under Attack In UK: Nationalist Reporter Threatened With Arrest For Recording AntiFa
Posted: 05 Apr 2017 12:41 PM PDT
Reporters from Rebel Media were recently threatened with arrest for attempting to do their jobs as journalists and report on a violent Antifa demonstration in the streets of London.
Antifa radicals angrily flooded the streets in reponse to a Britain First rally – which was in response to recent attacks on. The Rebel reporters Tommy Robinson and Caolan Robertson, supporters of the Britain First movement, were attacked and called fascists, racists, and a slew of other cliches by “anti-fascist” radicals before being ordered by police to “go straight to your car.”
When reporter Tommy Robinson asked what this command meant, the officer confirmed that he would be arrested if he didn’t go to his car.
Robinson reported, “After just minutes of Caolan and I arriving, Antifa and United Against Fascism swarmed us, throwing bottles and attacking us.”
UK Police have made many arrests for “offensive” posts about the migrants currently flooding the United Kingdom. This type of “hate speech” policing has become rampant in Europe, and was a little-recognized plank of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for President.
Britain First is what Rebel Media describes as a “controversial patriotic group that regularly holds marches against Islamic extremism.” It seems that their ideas have been interpreted some as being anti-Islam, when their social media stories with headlines like: “DESTRUCTION: MUSLIMS ARE DESTROYING PARIS!” are actually targeting radical Islamic terrorism.
It’s not your average Muslim that follows his faith that is the issue according to Britain First, it is the extremist ones who are committing terrorist attacks. As the Britain First website says: “the rapid growth of militant Islam is leading to the suppression of women, freedom of speech and racist attacks.”
How are we to justify why Rebel Media reporters were told to leave the scene? As reported by ABC News, 14 people were later arrested at the demonstration. Rebel News claims that all of the people arrested were members of anti-fascist organizations.
For more on this story, watch Tommy Robinson’s report below:
The post Freedom Of Speech Under Attack In UK: Nationalist Reporter Threatened With Arrest For Recording AntiFa appeared first on We Are Change.
|You are subscribed to email updates from We Are Change.
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
|Email delivery powered by Google|
|Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States|