The Anti-New York Times Analyzes Trump’s Geopolitics
|
 |
||||
|
|||||
A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
___________________________________________________________________
FREE SAMPLE 1 FED RESERVE NOTE
___________________________________________________________________
“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”
*****************************************
|
FRIDAY / MARCH 31, 2017
|
|
REBUTTAL BY  Picking up where we left off yesterday, an excerpt from this article:
“The United States launched more airstrikes in this month than during all of last year. In , it has airlifted local forces to front-line positions and has been accused of killing civilians in airstrikes. In , American troops and aircraft are central in supporting an urban offensive in Mosul, where airstrikes killed scores of people on March 17.”
Death, destruction and despair. Just like the good ol’ days of Bush-Cheney.
Trumpstein is bringing Zionist-inspired death and war to the Middle East — with much more still to come. If the American public starts to tire of this, they will swing hard-left again, as they did after 8 years of the Bush-Cheney wars. And no amount of sappy State-of-the-Union stunts using Navy Seal widows will save him.
As regular readers of The Anti-New York Times also know, Trumpstein has repeatedly threatened Iran and North Korea while talking trash about China. Sorry boys and girls, but we’ve been played. In our defense, we would like to point out that we were very much against Trumpstein before we shifted to 80% in favor and 20% uncertain. Sometimes, first impressions are the most accurate ones. Some excerpts from a June 2015 issue of The Anti-New York Times — our very first piece on the Trumpstein candidacy:
************************* Sulzberger’s Slimes, the Piranha Press and Establishment Republicant’s all seem to have their daggers out for the self-aggrandizing ego-maniac, Donald Trump. With enemies like that, he must be one of the “good guys”, right? Not exactly.
For all we know, the attacks on Trump from elements of the Yankee PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) are actually intended to boost his stature in the eyes of the good folk of the American heartland. Could Trump be a plant sent to keep relative “outsider” Rancid Paul from gaining any traction in the early GOP primaries…?
  Trump is for Trump — Remember that!
Only time will reveal the game, if there is one. But for now, attacks from Sulzberger and friends mean absolutely nothing. His all-of-a-sudden tough rhetoric on immigration sounds good and certainly plays well, but the final assessment of Donald Dump must be based on facts and facts alone. With that timeless principle of logic in mind, let’s have a look at the “anti-Establishment” resume of “The Donald.”
1999
Trump attempts to derail the campaign of the true anti-Globalist conservative, Pat Buchanan – candidate for the Reform Party’s Presidential Nomination. Sounding like the New York Slimes, candidate Trump denounces Buchanan as “isolationist” and an “extremist”.
—New York Post: September 20, 1999—
“Donald Trump accused would-be rival Pat Buchanan yesterday of espousing “repugnant” views on Hitler, amid reports of other presidential wannabes flirting with the Reform Party.
“Buchanan denigrates the memory of those Americans who gave their lives in the Second World War in the effort to stop Hitler,” the flamboyant New York developer, flexing his brand-new political muscles, said in a statement describing Buchanan’s views as “beyond belief.” Trump’s attack on Buchanan was prompted by the conservative Republican’s new isolationist book in which he slams the West for taking on Hitler. “I think it is essential that someone challenge these extreme and outrageous views.”    When a very worried mainstream media was destroying Pat Buchanan during the 1990’s, Trump joined the Buchanan-bashers while publicly saying he’d like to have Oprah Winfrey as his running mate.
*************************
The saddest part of this deepening delusion is that we still have to be grateful that Killary Rotten Clinscum was not elected — in much the same way that a man diagnosed with Herpes would be “grateful” that he didn’t contract AIDS. In the end-game, the Communist Left will come roaring back with its “first female President” anyway — if not in 2020 then certainly by 2024. Watch out for Kamala Harris, the Junior Communist Senator from the People’s Republic of California. She’s cunning, ambitious, light-skinned-bi-racial (Indian & Black Jamaican), and has that superficial charm that Killary could never effectively fake. Ms. Harris is a “politically correct” dream candidate on so many levels and easier on the eyes and far more stylish than your typical frumpy Communist-Democrat wench.
The buzz for Kamala 2020 (100th anniversary of women’s voting rights) is already starting. Should Trumpstein’s aggressive foreign policy blow up in his fatted face, the next swing to the Left will be final and fatal for America. 
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Trump is drawing us deeper and deeper into Middle East conflicts. Boobus Americanus 2: If he keeps this up, he’ll be a one-term President.
Sugar: The Jewss are gonna get their frickin’ war AND a non-White Marxisst female President too. Editor: They call that a ‘two-fer.’ |
