Skip to toolbar

Vaccinations: The Real Story

INTRODUCTION

If you raised the subject of immunization with any medical doctor they would probably tell you that vaccination is the most effective intervention of modern medicine which prevented more suffering and saved more lives than any other medical procedure.

They would also tell you that the demise of epidemic diseases like small pox and polio is one of the success stories of mass vaccination programs.  However, this claim is totally unsubstantiated.

The documented truth is that the incidence of, and mortality from any infectious diseases which used to decimate populations of Europe only some one hundred years ago declined by up to 90% BEFORE any vaccine has been used in mass proportions.  Also, diseases, like bubonic plague or scarlet fever, disappeared without any vaccination programs at all.  The mortality from the dreaded diphtheria declined decades before Corynebacterium diphtheriae had even been discovered and isolated.

Immunization against diphtheria was introduced in 1932-35 and on a mass scale in 1940, by which time the annual death rate was negligible (less than 300 deaths per million).  It is amply documented in medical literature that this mass vaccination was followed by unprecedented diphtheria epidemics–in fully vaccinated subjects.

The 1940s saw also the introduction of mass vaccination against tetanus and whooping cough which in many countries, including Australia, led to outbreaks of the so-called provocation poliomyelitis.  In 1950 Dr. McCloskey published evidence that there indeed was an association between administration of pertussis and/or pertussis-diphtheria toxoid and provocation poliomyelitis closely following pertussis vaccination administered within days before the onset of symptoms.  This is the same famous polio epidemic of 1949-50 which is used to push parents into vaccinating their children, especially against polio.  The provocation poliomyelitis is a well-known phenomenon which may follow administration of any vaccine, but especially DPT and polio.  It is officially admitted that all cases of polio in the US, since the introduction of the vaccine, are caused by the vaccine.  The same has been seen in Australia and other countries like England.  So the occurrence of the same phenomenon all around the world be asking too much of coincidence.

The truth about polio and smallpox vaccines is that they are heavily contaminated with animal viruses, being produced on monkey kidneys and calves respectively.  This gave us AIDS which started in central eastern Africa in those states where the WHO (World Health Organization) conducted the eradication campaign against smallpox and polio.  The batches of vaccines used here were heavily contaminated with both SV 40 and SIV (Simian Immuno-deficiency Virus) and bovine retrovirus, another AIDS-related virus.  One syringe was used on 40 to 60 people and contributed to the spread of AIDS to hundreds of thousands of innocent unsuspecting people.  It is beyond coincidence that the present raging epidemic of AIDS is affecting mostly those states where the polio/smallpox eradication campaign was conducted.

It should not come as a surprise that a new syndrome of immune incompetence or immuno-suppression developed in babies too.  High incidence of child leukemia and cancer has been linked to vaccines by many authors who attributed this to inappropriate antigenic stimulation provided by vaccines and to the presence of contaminating SV40 virus.  Respiratory syncytial virus, or more befittingly, the chimpanzee coryza virus, causes lingering upper and especially lower respiratory tract disease in babies.  These are only the viruses which were discovered and are now, perhaps, looked for.  [H: No, they were manufactured.]  What about the myriad of other, unknown animal viruses lurking in the vaccines?

 

It has also been documented that vaccine against tuberculosis had no impact whatsoever on the incidence of the disease, which is essentially a disease of malnutrition and overcrowding.

The best evidence of ineffectiveness of vaccines comes from two facts: firstly, such deadly diseases as bubonic plague disappeared without any immunization programs, simply because of better sanitation and nutrition and uncrowded life styles and, secondly, the countries which do not vaccinate against certain diseases, like pertussis, report amelioration of the disease and the incidence which compares favorably with the incidence of whooping cough in those countries which claim an almost complete pertussis vaccination cover.  West Germany’s Hamburg enjoys freedom from vaccination push since 1962 without the incidence of infectious disease exceeding the incidences in countries that claim more than 90% vaccination compliance.

In 1975 Japan raised the minimum vaccination age to two years: this was followed by the virtual disappearance of “COT DEATH” and infantile convulsions.  Sweden stopped vaccinating against whooping cough in 1979, due to ineffectiveness of the whole-cell vaccine and adverse effects which far exceeded the adverse effects of the whooping cough illness.  After trailing two Japanese acellular pertussis vaccines, Sweden rejected these also, and for the same reasons.

While studying thousands of pages written on vaccines I have not found a single paper which would demonstrate that in epidemic situations only unvaccinated children contracted the diseases.  Even during vaccine trials many children contracted the disease against which they were vaccinated, often within a few days.  Although the initial target of all vaccination programs was to eradicate the infectious diseases like whooping cough, polio and measles, when it became all too painfully clear that it is an unrealistic goal, the proponents of vaccination started telling parents and the public that at least the vaccines alleviate the disease.

Not even this is true.  Not only diseases like whooping cough can affect seriously both vaccinated and unvaccinated children (based on hospital admissions), but there is a new disease–atypical measles–which is an especially vicious form of measles only affecting vaccinated children and has a considerable mortality rate.

After studying the extensive literature demonstrating ineffectiveness of vaccines and their dangers, I concluded that the call for suspension of all vaccination programs is not inevitable.

Instead of relying on a “magic bullet” (one injection solves it all), the orthodoxy should start learning the dynamics and importance of infectious diseases and effective treatment.  It is absurd to set out to eradicate infectious diseases which play an important role in the maturation of the immune system of our children.

It has been documented in medical literature that people who contracted cancer and other chronic degenerative diseases in later years have remarkably few infectious diseases of childhood to report.  A proper development of rash during such infectious diseases as measles is apparently important for the prevention of cancer and other serious disease in later life.

The sordid story of vaccination programs reveals the enormous gaps in the knowledge base of the orthodox medical establishment, especially a profound lack of knowledge of the dynamics of health and disease and functioning of the human body.  It is this same medical industry which enjoys the protection of the institutions of the State in most industrially developed countries.

The attention of medical professionals and the State should turn to such scientific medical systems as homeopathy which is not only based on sound knowledge of human physiology but also on a profoundly scientific knowledge of the healing processes and the testing of thousands of specific remedies.  It should concern us all that scientific healing systems like homeopathy or naturopathy enjoy a substantially higher rate of success and a substantially lower rate of side-effects from their remedies than do those of allopathic medicine.  The cost effectiveness of these, today still called ‘alternative’, medical systems is another good reason for the State to look seriously into them as viable alternatives to play an important part in the national health system.  [H: God forbid!]

THE VACCINATION HYPOTHESIS–HOW ARE THE VACCINES SUPPOSED TO WORK?

According to orthodox medicine, the purpose of vaccination is to eradicate infectious diseases.  These diseases are considered bad and a nuisance, rather than the way Nature primes and challenges the immature immune systems of our children.  “Measles is misery” scream the posters in doctors’ surgeries and try to tell you that one injection will do away with the problem.  They do not tell you that measles and other infectious diseases of childhood have AN IMPORTANT ROLE TO PLAY.

A group of Swiss medical doctors formed an action group which questions the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccination of children.  In their 18-page documents they write that in a famous pediatric clinic in Basel until recently (1969) they used to induce measles in children with serious renal diseases (nuphritic syndrome) as a means of healing or at least improving substantially the condition.

Auto-immune diseases like asthma, lupus erythematosus or exema also either disappeared or greatly improved after the child contracted and overcame measles.

“They also questioned the wisdom of relentlessly trying to suppress natural expressions like fever instead of recognizing its importance in the natural healing process.  Also, [regarding] infectious diseases of childhood is a well-documented fact that the immune system must be primed and challenged in young individuals if it is to function properly and protect the individual against the far worse auto-immune disease of later life, such as cancer.”

All medical systems–except orthodox or allopathic medicine–look at the human (and animal) body as a whole and interconnected system.  Homeopathy understands disease as a need of the body to rid itself of toxins and it does so in an orderly and meaningful fashion.  Although homeopathic science looks at individual symptoms for guidelines in understanding the diseases and selecting a remedy, it does not attempt to suppress the symptoms, rather initially accentuates the symptoms to enhance the natural healing efforts and mechanisms of the body.

Hering’s ‘law’ holds that as a disease passes from an acute to a chronic form the symptoms move from the surface of the body to the interior, from the lower part of the body to the upper and from the less vital organs to the more vital ones.  Under correct (homeopathic) treatment this movement is reversed and the symptoms move from the more vital organs to the less vital, from the upper part of the body to the lower, and from the interior to the skin.  This is also true for the movement of symptoms in acute disease.  In cases of the so-called fixed miasmic diseases, like measles, the rash first appears on the forehead and moves onto the trunk and extremities. In contrast, the rash of atypical measles in vaccinated children first appears on the extremities, moves to the trunk and attacks the lungs and other internal organs.

Vaccination, by introducing viruses directly into the blood stream, far from preventing diseases, actually pushes the disease into a chronic form and deeper into the body where it then attacks vital organs.  The results of suppressing measles and other infectious diseases in this manner are cancer and other auto-immune and chronic diseases.

Medical assessment of alleged effectiveness and efficacy of vaccines centers around the production of antibodies.  Modern immunologists studying the biologic significance of the secretory gamma-A immunoglobulins hold that immunity is classically concerned with resistance to infection.  This is based on the well-known fact that individuals who recover from an infectious disease almost never succumb to the same disease again.  Today we know that the functions of the immune system are more diverse and include not only defense but also homeostasis and surveillance.

In the vertebrates (which group includes humans as we too have a backbone), a diverse cell system has developed–the lympho-reticular system which is distributed throughout the body and lines the lymphatic and vascular systems.  Its cells occur within the thymus, lymph nodes and spleen, forming an internal secretory system and an external secretory system in those body tracts exposed to the exterior–the respiratory, gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems.

The tissues of the lympho-reticular system contain a variety of cells performing separate functions, either directly of through producing a variety of influences recognized as foreign by the host.  The internal secretory system produces serum immunoglubulins.  Of course, the gamma-G immuno-globulins secretory system produces a specific group of antibodies–the secretory gamma-A immunoglobulins.  The precise function of the secretory component is not yet understood.

A study evaluating the relative roles of serum and nasal antibody in protecting against parainfluenzae type-1 infection showed that the nasal antibody played a very important part–much higher than the serum antibodies.  This casts doubt on the importance of the serum antibodies produced following vaccination, and hence doubt on the conferring of immunity.  Indeed, we see this proven when vaccinated children contract the diseases against which they have been vaccinated.

Vaccinated children commonly exhibit a deranged immunological response by developing atypical measles, mumps and possibly many other atypical manifestations of the diseases targeted by vaccines.  It is far better, then, to allow the natural processes to proceed without harmful interference.

[END OF QUOTING]

How can I come to express the IMPORTANCE OF THE ABOVE?  Readers, YOU ARE PEOPLE OF THE LIE–and what you DO NOT KNOW WILL MOST SURELY KILL YOU OR MAKE YOU WISH IT DID.  But what is happening here–IS A DELIBERATE KILLING OF YOUR OWN IN ONE WAY OF ANOTHER AT SOME STAGE OF YOUR LIFE-SPAN.  I consider these chapters on such topics AS MANDATORY STUDY FOR ALL MY PEOPLE.  THANK YOU.

***

Source:  CONTACT: THE PHOENIX PROJECT, January 31, 1995, Volume 8, Number 1, Pages 2-4.

http://www.phoenixarchives.com/contact/1995/0195/013195.pdf

Transcribed into HTML format by R. Montana.


 
Supplemental information:

 

Cleansing The Body Of Parasites Using Nature’s Bounty

 

Rocky Montana / 8-1-2015

As the product ‘Gaialyte’, referred to in the above article, is no longer available, it was necessary to find a comparable product.  One very effective and convenient parasite cleanse product I have found is sold by Mountain Meadow Herbs.  It is a mixture of three tinctures from the most powerful parasite-fighting herbs that I know of; Black Walnut Hulls, Wormwood, and Cloves, all of which were recommended by Dr. Hulda Clark for this purpose.  The manufacturer’s recommendations for usage is: “3-20 drops [depending on body weight] three times a day.  Not recommended for use by children under 5 years of age or pregnant mothers”.  The name of the product is Clark FX Para-Cleanse Formula.  Mountain Meadow Herbs, contact information: phone: 1-888-528-8615; website:www.mountainmeadowherbs.com.

Personal parasite cleanse protocol:  Use 20-25 drops of tincture 3 times per day before meals, 15 days per month, for a period of 3 months.  Conduct parasite cleanse twice a year in Spring and Autumn; repeat every year.  Repeat twice per year.  Start cleansing on the first the day of the full moon each month, as this period is believed to be the time when potential parasites are most likely to hatch in the body.  Place dosages into a tablespoon, add water, and place under the tongue (sublingual) for 3 minutes (minimum) before washing down the remaining tincture with juice or water.  Sublingual absorption is the fastest and most effective way of absorption liquids into the blood stream, other than by inoculation.

 


You may also like...

Translate »