Terrorists and Politicians: Both Need to Go (to jail)
Best Friends Forever? Terrorist Groups Benefiting From Clinton Support
Best Friends Forever? Terrorist Groups Benefiting From Clinton Support © AP Photo/ Kevin Lamarque
21:45 22.08.2015(updated 21:32 23.08.2015) Get short URL
While democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton vows to continue the US’ longstanding “war on terrorism,” it is Rodham Clinton who has undisputedly worked for the benefit of international terrorism, US analyst Caleb Maupin claims.
According to American journalist and political analyst Caleb Maupin, there are at least two international terrorist groups that have “directly benefitted” from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s support.
The US analyst referred to the infamous terrorist organization Mujahadeen E-Khalq (MEK), or the People’s Holy Warriors, which was involved in the mass murder of Iranians and Americans in the 1970s.
During the Iran-Iraq war MEK joined Saddam Hussein dubbing itself the “Iranian National Liberation Army.” The notorious mujahadeens unleashed a massacre in the Iranian countryside killing a large number of peaceful civilians.
After the war, the Hussein government “utilized” MEK to exterminate the Kurds. The overall number of victims killed by MEK amounted to tens of thousands.
Surprisingly, “in September of 2012, then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton officially removed MEK from the list of designated terrorist organizations. Because of this designation by Rodham Clinton, it is now legal for anyone in the United States to provide material support to the MEK terrorists. MEK has continued its shady relationship with Rudy Giuliani, Tom Ridge, and a number of other politicians,” Maupin pointed out.
And that is not all, the US analyst noted, revealing that the other legally designated terrorist group “that Clinton apparently has a soft spot for” is the Nigerian Boko Haram. The extremist Islamic sect founded in 2002 is responsible for growing chaos in Nigeria. In March 2015, Boko Haram pledged allegiance to the brutal Islamic State.
“However, Clinton flatly refused to list Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist organization,” Maupin remarked, adding that the group was eventually designated as a terrorist organization in 2013, after Boko Haram “had been killing people for 11 years.”
There is an obvious explanation for this mysterious, irresponsible and irrational behavior of the democratic presidential hopeful. It’s all about oil, Maupin underscored.
Indeed, the MEK terrorists are seeking to topple the government of oil-rich anti-imperialist Iran. In its turn, Boko Haram is destabilizing Nigeria that has become Africa’s top oil-producer after US/NATO forces bombed Libya into havoc.
And of course, everyone remembers Clinton’s reaction to Libya’s President Muammar Gaddafi’s gruesome murder: “We came, we saw, he died,” Clinton said with laughter.
“Nigeria and the Islamic Republic of Iran are both oil-exporting countries that function as competitors to the US-aligned Gulf states in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Oman, and Bahrain are all US-aligned Gulf states. Their resources are controlled by Wall Street and London-based oil corporations. The more that Iran and Nigeria can be destabilized and inhibited in their ability to export, the more profits Wall Street and its Arab vassals can make,” the analyst stressed.
Maupin exposed that Clinton has directly received millions of dollars from the Gulf’s private sponsors through her personal foundation. Between $10 and $25 million were received from Saudi Arabia, between one to five million dollars from Qatar; between one to five million dollars from the United Arab Emirates and a similar sum of money was received from Oman.
Remarkably, the Gulf state elites have their own links to terrorism. Currently they are funding al-Qaeda’s affiliate Al-Nusra Front in Syria as well as the so-called “Free Syrian Army” which seeks to overthrow Bashar al-Assad.
It is worth mentioning that notorious Osama Bin Laden also had certain connections to influential Saudi aristocrats.
“Clinton, like all major politicians in the United States, is an agent of big money. Terrorism in the Middle East and other parts of the world is highly beneficial to the rich and powerful… Don’t be fooled by her campaign rhetoric. Clinton’s long record in the service of terrorism speaks for itself,” Maupin concluded.