ed note–pay careful attention to what’s being said here.
The narrative being put forth by the Russians is not some page taken from the usual drama where the blame game takes center stage, but rather that they are saying that NO chemical attack took place at all.
In other words, what the Russians are saying is that it was all a ‘hoax’, which is entirely possible, since with the heavy presence of Russian, Syrian, Iranian and Hezbollah troops on the ground, as well as the fact that the misnamed ‘rebels’ and their terror ops are all but quashed, Israel would find it very difficult to get her saboteurs into the region with the necessary chemical munitions to pull the false flag off successfully. Furthermore, the Russians–being after all very careful chess players and very adept at playing the public relations game–would not go so far out on a limb as to characterize this latest event as a ‘hoax’ unless there was substantive evidence to back up such a claim.
And now, Israel has just attacked Syria with warplanes, ostensibly to ‘punish’ Assad for ‘butchering’ his own people.
So, the question is–Did the Russians know about this ahead of time and allowed Israel to do it and thus deal with the ensuing fallout?
“Syrian doctors in Douma have dismissed the rumors they had received patients suffering from chemical poisoning. In an interview to the media doctor Yaser Abdel Majid, of the city hospital, said that they had never received patients with chemical poisoning either last weekend or since the beginning of hostilities in Syria.” CONTINUE READING
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) does not have verified information on the alleged use of a chemical weapon in the city of Douma, Eastern Ghouta, because there are no ICRC representatives in the region, the ICRC Spokeswoman Iolanda Jaquemet informed TASS on Monday. CONTINUE READING