Trump’s Meeting With Kim Jong Un: The Anti-New York Times

A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,

Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines


        MARCH, 2018   1 FED RESERVE NOTE



“We read and rebut their vile crap so you won’t have to!”



FRIDAY / MARCH 9, 2018

NY Times: Trump’s Meeting With Kim Jong-un Is Another Pledge to Do What Nobody Else Can



Judging by the tone of this article, it really does appear that chess-master Trump’s clever approach to defusing the dangerous trip wired bomb on the Korean peninsula has duped and confounded the Globalist-Zionist Axis of Evil, or least some of its more stupid journalistic mouthpieces.

From the article:

Peter Baker: When the establishment told him he should talk with North Korea, …

Rebuttal: Bullshit! Back during the 2016 QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show), the establishment and its Golden Girl Killary mocked candidate  Trump when he originally proposed the idea of meeting with Kim. This was at a time when Killary’s allies were escalating the situation in preparation for the war that she was intending to drag America into.

Peter Baker:  President Trump scorned the idea. “Presidents and their administrations have been talking to North Korea for 25 years” and had been made to look like “fools,” he scoffed, and then rattled his saber. “Sorry, but only one thing will work!”

Rebuttal: Trump only said that after the press mocked his idea to meet with Lol’ Kim. His “sabre rattling” was purely theatrical — intended to keep the warmongers at bay while back-channel talks took place.


Headline: (May 18, 2016) The Guardian (UK):

Donald Trump says he is open to talks with North Korea’s Kim Jong-un (Here)



Headline: (June 1, 2016) The Guardian (UK):

North Korea praises Trump and urges US voters to reject ‘dull Hillary’

An editorial in DPRK Today, an official media outlet, welcomed the Republican presidential candidate’s proposal to hold direct talks with Kim Jong-un. (Here)



Headline: (October 28, 2016) The Nation:

Hillary’s Hawks Are Threatening Escalation Against North Korea: They’re talking about cyber war, intensified sanctions, and preemptive military strikes. (Here)



After being mocked for wanting to speak with Lil’ Kim (Image 1 from early 2017), Trump then pursued a policy of tough talk that would give him the cover he needed to do what he has just announced will happen in May — a meeting with Kim!


Peter Baker:  Five months later, Mr. Trump cast aside his skepticism and agreed to talk to North Korea with no more promise of success at negotiating an end to its nuclear and missile programs than his predecessors had.

Rebuttal: Wow. It really does appear that these fools took Trump’s bait. That’s perfect because with Trump having positioned himself as the tough “sheriff” doing verbal battle against the equally tough-talking Kim,  the establishment cannot so easily undermine his attempts at achieving a lasting peace as “weakness.”

Peter Baker: Shocking and yet somehow not surprising, Mr. Trump’s decision to do what no other sitting president has done and meet in person with a North Korean leader reflects an audacious and supremely self-confident approach to international affairs.

Rebuttal: It’s not “shocking” to Sugar and me, er, “The Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times. Though we too were originally fooled and angered by Trump’s “fire & fury” and “rocket man” trash talk; we, being real journalists and logocal thinkers, soon figured out the strategic deception while even most of the “alternative news” sites remained in the dark.

Horn tootin’ time:

From April, 2017:


Headline:  Could Trump, Putin & Xi Be Conspiring For Peace?


“What if Xi and Lil’ Kim are in on a plot to fake a potential war crisis in Asia? What if Trumpstein’s seemingly outrageous timing of launching missiles whilst having “chocolate cake” with Xi was all part of the act? What if China’s bizarre refusal to accept a delivery of North Korean coal and announced decision to buy more US coal instead is a stunt intended to sell the big ruse? What if the end result of this riveting drama is that a “fearful” Syria, and a “fearful” North Korea — backed up, respectively, by a “fearful” Putin and an equally “fearful” Xi — all make “concessions” to the “new Sheriff” in DC?


What if Sheriff Trumpstein comes out of this “world crisis” looking a hero for diffusing World War 3 while “bad guys” Lil’ Kim and Assad are left appearing “humbled?” What if Trumpstein, Putin and Xi then lead the world away from the brink of Soros and McCain’s World War 3 and toward the peace and “multi-polarity” that Trumpstein had advocated during the 2016 campaign? What if Satanyahu (who badly wants war with North Korea, Syria and Iran) is being pacified while actually being outmaneuvered? What if Trumpstein is faking war, for the hidden purpose of preventing war?


In one way or another, we are being played, boys and girls. Of that there can be no doubt. The amended question now is: Is Trumpstein playing games for evil purposes, or for the higher hidden purpose of avoiding war? The coming days and weeks should give us the answer to these “what ifs.” Should there be some 11th hour “deal” among the great powers to avert Armageddon, then we shall know for sure that it was all just a film.”



In contemplating a suspicious story about Trump’s “chocolate cake” over missiles with Xi of China, Sugar began to smell something fishy about the sudden Trump-Putin “split” and Trump’s sudden turn against Assad. How does North Korea and China fit in?


Nailed it.

We caught quite a bit of ridicule from some of “youse guys” for proposing that hypothesis nearly one year ago. In subsequent weeks, we upgraded the idea from hypothesis to known fact and have never since deviated. And now, low and behold, President Trump will be the first American president to meet with a leader of North Korea, this May. Wow. We can only imagine the butt-hurt that will emanate from the offices of Sulzberger’s Slimes when that historic moment and photo-op happens.

Read it and weep Mr. Soros and Mr. Satanyahoo. Your world war wet dreams (though both for different motives) may not materialize after all. A Nobel Prize for Donald Trump? What do say, Sulzberger?



1. Satanyahoo and his pig-faced wife couldn’t contain their demonic glee when Trump trashed and threatened North Korea (a key hi-tech supplier of Syria, Iran and Egypt) at the U.N. Sorry Bibi, there will be no U.S. attack on North Korea. 2. Were it not for the fact that the Nobel Peace Prize is reserved only for communists and Globalists, Trump’s pacification of Syria and the Korean peninsula would have earned him recognition. 3And “Rocket Man” as co-winner?


Erin Burnett,  CNN ultra-libtard, said what?

“If President Trump can truly solve this problem (North Korea), he would be going down as a great President, and there’s no way around that. That is the reality here.” (here)


Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Trump will be meeting with Kim of North Korea.

Boobus Americanus 2: Wow! That will truly be historic. Not that I like Trump, but it does appear that the hard line he took with that lunatic finally brought him to his senses. Ya have to give Trump credit.

Boobus Americanus 1: Agreed



Sugar:  Well played,Trump and Fat Boy — well played.

 Editor: And credit to your feline instincts, Sugar — for sensing the grand strategy nearly one whole year in advance.


Email address:


You may also like...